The evaluation of GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule for colonic transit test in patients with slow transit constipation
- 15 Downloads
The evaluation of GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule for colonic transit test in patients with slow transit constipation (STC) was studied.
Materials and methods
STC patients (n = 162) were randomly divided into experimental group (n = 84, orally taken GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule and X-ray granule capsule) and control group (n = 78, orally taken X-ray granule capsule). Comparison of the time in colonic transit test between the two groups was conducted. The data of GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule in vivo time, time of capsule passing through the colon, the number of high amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs), and physiological response ratio were analyzed.
There were no significant differences in the whole colonic transit test time, right colonic transit time, left colonic transit time, and rectosigmoid colonic transit time between experimental group and control group (p > 0.05). All patients had no abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, black stool, difficulty in electronic capsule excretion, or any other discomfort during the test.
GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule can continuously evaluate the dynamic characteristics of digestive tract in STC patients and is consistent with X-ray granule capsule, which is meaningful to clinical application.
KeywordsSlow transit constipation GI-pill Electronic capsule Colonic transit test
This study was supported by Key Disciplines ConstructionProject of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai (No. PWZxk2017–11) and Science and Technology Development Fund of Shanghai Pudong New Area (No. PKJ2018-Y10).
- 3.Rao SSC, Rattanakovit K, Patcharatrakul T (2016) Diagnosis and management of chronic constipation in adults, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &. Hepatology 13:295Google Scholar
- 8.Davidson JB, O'Grady G, Arkwright JW, Zarate N, Scott SM, Pullan AJ, Dinning PJ (2011) Anatomical registration and three-dimensional visualization of low and high-resolution pan-colonic manometry recordings. Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society 23:387–e171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Chen J-H, Parsons SP, Shokrollahi M, Wan A, Vincent AD, Yuan Y, Pervez M, Chen WL, Xue M, Zhang KK, Eshtiaghi A, Armstrong D, Bercik P, Moayyedi P, Greenwald E, Ratcliffe EM, Huizinga JD (2018) Characterization of simultaneous pressure waves as biomarkers for colonic motility assessed by high-resolution colonic Manometry. Front Physiol 9:1248–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Nelson AD, Camilleri M, Acosta A, Boldingh A, Busciglio I, Burton D, Ryks M, Zinsmeister AR (2017) A single-center, prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized study of the effect of a vibrating capsule on colonic transit in patients with chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 29:e13034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Spencer NJ, Kyloh M, Wattchow DA, Thomas A, Sia TC, Brookes SJ, Nicholas SJ (2011) Characterization of motor patterns in isolated human colon: are there differences in patients with slow-transit constipation? American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 302:G34–G43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Camilleri M, Bharucha AE, Di Lorenzo C, Hasler WL, Prather CM, Rao SS, Wald A (2008) American Neurogastroenterology and motility society consensus statement on intraluminal measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motility in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 20:1269–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar