Advertisement

The evaluation of GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule for colonic transit test in patients with slow transit constipation

  • Yong-bing Wang
  • Gang Li
  • Yun-feng Wang
  • Yu-jiang Ding
  • Guo-zheng Yan
  • Ding Han
  • Zhi-wu Wang
  • Xiao-hui ZhaoEmail author
Original Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

The evaluation of GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule for colonic transit test in patients with slow transit constipation (STC) was studied.

Materials and methods

STC patients (n = 162) were randomly divided into experimental group (n = 84, orally taken GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule and X-ray granule capsule) and control group (n = 78, orally taken X-ray granule capsule). Comparison of the time in colonic transit test between the two groups was conducted. The data of GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule in vivo time, time of capsule passing through the colon, the number of high amplitude propagating contractions (HAPCs), and physiological response ratio were analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences in the whole colonic transit test time, right colonic transit time, left colonic transit time, and rectosigmoid colonic transit time between experimental group and control group (p > 0.05). All patients had no abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, black stool, difficulty in electronic capsule excretion, or any other discomfort during the test.

Conclusion

GI-pill gastrointestinal electronic capsule can continuously evaluate the dynamic characteristics of digestive tract in STC patients and is consistent with X-ray granule capsule, which is meaningful to clinical application.

Keywords

Slow transit constipation GI-pill Electronic capsule Colonic transit test 

Notes

Financial support

This study was supported by Key Disciplines ConstructionProject of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai (No. PWZxk2017–11) and Science and Technology Development Fund of Shanghai Pudong New Area (No. PKJ2018-Y10).

References

  1. 1.
    Camilleri M, Ford AC, Mawe GM, Dinning PG, Rao SS, Chey WD, Simrén M, Lembo A, Young-Fadok TM, Chang L (2017) Chronic constipation. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 3:17095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emmanuel A, Mattace-Raso F, Neri MC, Petersen K-U, Rey E, Rogers J (2017) Constipation in older people: a consensus statement. Int J Clin Pract 71:e12920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rao SSC, Rattanakovit K, Patcharatrakul T (2016) Diagnosis and management of chronic constipation in adults, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &amp. Hepatology 13:295Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Han EC, Oh H-K, Ha H-K, Choe EK, Moon SH, Ryoo S-B, Park KJ (2012) Favorable surgical treatment outcomes for chronic constipation with features of colonic pseudo-obstruction. World J Gastroenterol 18:4441–4446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vazquez Roque M, Bouras EP (2015) Epidemiology and management of chronic constipation in elderly patients. Clin Interv Aging 10:919–930PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ranasinghe N, Devanarayana NM, Benninga MA, van Dijk M, Rajindrajith S (2017) Psychological maladjustment and quality of life in adolescents with constipation. Arch Dis Child 102:268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhu F, Xu S, Zhang Y, Chen F, Ji J, Xie G (2016) Total Glucosides of Paeony promote intestinal motility in slow transit constipation rats through amelioration of interstitial cells of Cajal. PLoS One 11:e0160398–e0160398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davidson JB, O'Grady G, Arkwright JW, Zarate N, Scott SM, Pullan AJ, Dinning PJ (2011) Anatomical registration and three-dimensional visualization of low and high-resolution pan-colonic manometry recordings. Neurogastroenterology and motility : the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society 23:387–e171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen J-H, Parsons SP, Shokrollahi M, Wan A, Vincent AD, Yuan Y, Pervez M, Chen WL, Xue M, Zhang KK, Eshtiaghi A, Armstrong D, Bercik P, Moayyedi P, Greenwald E, Ratcliffe EM, Huizinga JD (2018) Characterization of simultaneous pressure waves as biomarkers for colonic motility assessed by high-resolution colonic Manometry. Front Physiol 9:1248–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alame AM, Bahna H (2012) Evaluation of constipation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 25:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khaikin M, Wexner S-D (2006) Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. World J Gastroenterol 12:3168–3173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nelson AD, Camilleri M, Acosta A, Boldingh A, Busciglio I, Burton D, Ryks M, Zinsmeister AR (2017) A single-center, prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized study of the effect of a vibrating capsule on colonic transit in patients with chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 29:e13034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gluck N, Half EE, Bieber V, Schwartz D, Ron Y, Gralnek I, Klein A, Lachter J, Levy MS, Moshkowitz M, Arber N (2019) Novel prep-less X-ray imaging capsule for colon cancer screening: a feasibility study. Gut 68:774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gluck N, Shpak B, Brun R, Rösch T, Arber N, Moshkowitz M (2016) A novel prepless X-ray imaging capsule for colon cancer screening. Gut 65:371–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spencer NJ, Kyloh M, Wattchow DA, Thomas A, Sia TC, Brookes SJ, Nicholas SJ (2011) Characterization of motor patterns in isolated human colon: are there differences in patients with slow-transit constipation? American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 302:G34–G43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lundin E, Karlbom U, Westlin JE, Kairemo K, Jung B, Husin S, Påhlman L, Graf W (2004) Scintigraphic assessment of slow transit constipation with special reference to right- or left-sided colonic delay. Color Dis 6:499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Camilleri M, Bharucha AE, Di Lorenzo C, Hasler WL, Prather CM, Rao SS, Wald A (2008) American Neurogastroenterology and motility society consensus statement on intraluminal measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motility in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 20:1269–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bassi P, Kaur G (2010) pH modulation: a mechanism to obtain pH-independent drug release. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 7:845–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Theriot CM, Young VB (2014) Microbial and metabolic interactions between the gastrointestinal tract and Clostridium difficile infection. Gut Microbes 5:86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Korkut E, Bektaş M, Alkan M, Üstün Y, Meco C, Özden A, Soykan I (2010) Esophageal motility and 24-h pH profiles of patients with heterotopic gastric mucosa in the cervical esophagus. European Journal of Internal Medicine 21:21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong-bing Wang
    • 1
  • Gang Li
    • 1
  • Yun-feng Wang
    • 1
  • Yu-jiang Ding
    • 1
  • Guo-zheng Yan
    • 2
  • Ding Han
    • 2
  • Zhi-wu Wang
    • 2
  • Xiao-hui Zhao
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryShanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated Pudong New District People’s HospitalShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Institute of Precise Engineering and Intelligent MicrosystemsShanghai Jiaotong UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Clinical Medical SchoolShanghai University of Medicine & Health SciencesShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations