Abstract
Background
The aim of the study was to describe the results of 3D high-resolution anorectal manometry (3DHRAM) in a large cohort of patients with functional anorectal disorders.
Methods
In this single-center retrospective study, all consecutive patients referred for investigation of fecal incontinence (FI) or dyssynergic defecation (DD) underwent 3DHRAM. The parameters analyzed were usual manometric data, repartition of dyssynergic patterns, and the prevalence of a new “muscular subtype classification” underlying dyssynergia, anal sphincter defects, and pelvic floor disorders.
Results
Final analyses were performed in 1477 patients with a mean age 54 ± 16 years; 825 patients suffered from DD, and 652 patients suffered from FI. Among these patients, 86% met the diagnostic criteria for dyssynergia. Type II dyssynergia was the most frequently observed (56%) in women and men suffering from FI and in women with DD. Type I was the most frequently observed in men with DD (49%). Regarding the muscle type subgroups, combined puborectalis muscle involvement with an external anal sphincter profile was the most frequently observed. The global prevalence of rectal intussusception and excessive perineal descent were 12% and 21%, respectively. Type III dyssynergia was more frequently associated with pelvic floor disorders than were other types of dyssynergia (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
This large cohort study provides reference values for 3DHRAM in patients with functional anorectal disorders. Further studies are necessary to assess the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in healthy volunteers and to develop new scores and classifications including all of these new parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rao SSC (2010) Advances in diagnostic assessment of fecal incontinence and dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:910–919
Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE (1999) AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116:735–760
Azpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE (2002) Anorectal functional testing: review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol 97:232–240
Rao SSC, Azpiroz F, Diamant N, Enck P, Tougas G, Wald A (2002) Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 14:553–559
Meunier PD, Gallavardin D (1993) Anorectal manometry: the state of the art. Dig Dis 11:252–264
Savoye G, Leroi AM, Bertot-Sassigneux P, Touchais JY, Devroede G, Denis P (2002) Does water-perfused catheter overdiagnose anismus compared to balloon probe? Scand J Gastroenterol 37:1411–1416
Cheeney G, Nguyen M, Valestin J, Rao SSC (2012) Topographic and Manometric characterization of the recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR). Neurogastroenterol Motil 24:e147–e154
Lee TH, Lee JS (2012) High-resolution anorectal manometry and anal Endosonographic findings in the evaluation of fecal incontinence. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 18:450–451
Jones MP, Post J, Crowell MD (2007) High-resolution manometry in the evaluation of anorectal disorders: a simultaneous comparison with water-perfused manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 102:850–855
Lee HJ, Jung KW, Han S, Kim JW, Park SK, Yoon IJ, Koo HS, Seo SY, Yang DH, Kim KJ, Ye BD, Byeon JS, Yang SK, Kim JH, Myung SJ (2014) Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry/topography in a healthy Korean population and the effects of gender and body mass index. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:529–537
Noelting J, Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Harvey DM, Ravi K, Zinsmeister AR (2012) Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women: effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient. Am J Gastroenterol 107:1530–1536
Li Y, Yang X, Xu C, Zhang Y, Zhang X (2013) Normal values and pressure morphology for three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry of asymptomatic adults: a study in 110 subjects. Int J Color Dis 28:1161–1168
Carrington EV, Grossi U, Knowles CH, Scott SM (2014) Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry: a time for consensus and collaboration. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26:1356–1357
Lazarescu A, Sadowski DC (2011) High resolution anorectal manometry: establishment of normal values in healthy volunteers. Gastroenterology 140:S–796
Coss-Adame E, Rao SS, Valestin J et al (2015) Accuracy and reproducibility of high-definition anorectal manometry and pressure topography analyses in healthy subjects. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:1143–1150.e1
Xu C, Zhao R, Conklin JL et al (2014) Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis syndrome compared with healthy adults: a retrospective study in 79 cases. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26:621–629
Mion F, Garros A, Brochard C, Vitton V, Ropert A, Bouvier M, Damon H, Siproudhis L, Roman S (2017) 3D high-definition anorectal manometry: values obtained in asymptomatic volunteers, fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Results of a prospective multicenter study (NOMAD). Neurogastroenterol Motil 29(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13049
Pilipenko VI, Tepliuk DA, Shakhovskaia AK, Isakov VA (2014) Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in a healthy women: effects of age and maternity. Eksp Klin Gastroenterol (7):55–58
James-Stevenson T, Xu H, Heit M, Shin A (2018) Age and dyssynergia subtypes associated with normal sphincter pressures in women with fecal incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 24(3):247–251
Vitton V, Ben Hadj Amor W, Baumstarck K et al (2013) Comparison of three-dimensional high-resolution manometry and endoanal ultrasound in the diagnosis of anal sphincter defects. Colorectal Dis 15:e607–e611
Benezech A, Cappiello M, Baumstarck K, Grimaud JC, Bouvier M, Vitton V (2017) Rectal intussusception: can high resolution three-dimensional ano-rectal manometry compete with conventional defecography? Neurogastroenterol Motil 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12978
Benezech A, Bouvier M, Grimaud J-C et al (2014) Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry and diagnosis of excessive perineal descent: a comparative pilot study with defaecography. Colorectal Dis 16:O170–O175
Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Noelting J, Harvey DM, Zinsmeister AR (2013) Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution anorectal manometry. Gastroenterology 144:314–322.e2
Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97
Knowles CH, Scott SM, Legg PE, Allison ME, Lunniss PJ (2002) Level of classification performance of KESS (symptom scoring system for constipation) validated in a prospective series of 105 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 45:842–843
Rao SS, Welcher KD, Leistikow JS (1998) Obstructive defecation: a failure of rectoanal coordination. Am J Gastroenterol 93:1042–1050
Lee TH, Bharucha AE (2016) How to perform and interpret a high-resolution anorectal manometry test. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 22:46–59
Grossi U, Carrington EV, Bharucha AE, Horrocks EJ, Scott SM, Knowles CH (2016) Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defaecation. Gut 65:447–455
Rao SSC, Patcharatrakul T (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of dyssynergic defecation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 22:423–435
Raja S, Okeke FC, Stein EM, Dhalla S, Nandwani M, Lynch KL, Gyawali CP, Clarke JO (2017) Three-dimensional anorectal manometry enhances diagnostic gain by detecting sphincter defects and puborectalis pressure. Dig Dis Sci 62:3536–3541
Vitton V, Grimaud J-C, Bouvier M (2013) Three-dimension high-resolution anorectal manometry can precisely measure perineal descent. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 19:257–258
Heinrich H, Fruehauf H, Sauter M, Steingötter A, Fried M, Schwizer W, Fox M (2013) The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements. Neurogastroenterol Motil 25:230–237, e163
Bharucha AE, Dunivan G, Goode PS, Lukacz ES, Markland AD, Matthews CA, Mott L, Rogers RG, Zinsmeister AR, Whitehead WE, Rao SSC, Hamilton FA (2015) Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and classification of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) workshop. Am J Gastroenterol 110:127–136
Abramov Y, Sand PK, Botros SM, Gandhi S, Miller JJR, Nickolov A, Goldberg RP (2005) Risk factors for female anal incontinence: new insight through the Evanston-Northwestern twin sisters study. Obstet Gynecol 106:726–732
Rao SSC, Ozturk R, Laine L (2005) Clinical utility of diagnostic tests for constipation in adults: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 100:1605–1615
Staller K (2015) Role of anorectal manometry in clinical practice. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 13:418–431
Rao SSC, Mudipalli RS, Stessman M, Zimmerman B (2004) Investigation of the utility of colorectal function tests and Rome II criteria in dyssynergic defecation (Anismus). Neurogastroenterol Motil 16:589–596
Patcharatrakul T, Valestin J, Schmeltz A, Schulze K, Rao SSC (2018) Factors associated with response to biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(5):715–721
Rezaie A, Iriana S, Pimentel M et al (2017) Can three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry detect anal sphincter defects in patients with faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis 19:468–475
Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Udén R, Ahlbäck SO, Holmström B (1994) Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1133–1141
Weiss EG, McLemore EC (2008) Functional disorders: rectoanal intussusception. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21:122–128
Ramage L, Simillis C, Yen C, Lutterodt C, Qiu S, Tan E, Kontovounisios C, Tekkis P (2017) Magnetic resonance defecography versus clinical examination and fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 21:915–927
Benezech A, Bouvier M, Lesavre N, Gonzalez JM, Baumstarck K, Grimaud JC, Vitton V (2016) Does patient position influence the results of three-dimension high resolution ano-rectal manometry? Br J Med Med Res 13:1–7
Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Veglia A, Guglielmi A, Sallustio PL, Tripoli G (2001) Contribution of posture to the maintenance of anal continence. Int J Color Dis 16:51–54
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CA performed the research, collected data, and wrote the paper.
LL performed the research and collected data.
CB performed the research and collected data.
KB conducted all statistical analyses.
MB performed the research, collected data, and wrote the paper.
VV designed the research study, performed the research, and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical statement
VV, MB, and CA have been consultants for Medtronic.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andrianjafy, C., Luciano, L., Bazin, C. et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry in functional anorectal disorders: results from a large observational cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 719–729 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03235-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03235-z