Advertisement

The growing discrepancy between resident training in colonic surgery and the rising number of general surgery graduates

  • Samuel A. Käser
  • Andreas Rickenbacher
  • Daniela Cabalzar-Wondberg
  • Marcel Schneider
  • Daniel Dietrich
  • Benjamin Misselwitz
  • Pierre-Alain Clavien
  • Matthias Turina
Original Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The decrease in resident operative experience due to working-hour directives and sub-specialization within general surgery is the subject of growing debate. This study aims to examine how the numbers of colectomies used for resident training have evolved since the introduction of working-hour directives and to place these results within the context of the number of new general surgeons.

Methods

Based on the nationwide database of the Swiss association for quality management in surgery, all segmental colectomies performed at 86 centers were analyzed according to the presence or absence of residents and compared to national numbers of surgical graduates.

Results

Of 19,485 segmental colectomies between 2006 and 2015, 36% were used for training purposes. Residents performed 4%, junior staff surgeons 31%, senior staff surgeons 55%, and private surgeons 10%. The percentage performed by residents decreased significantly, while the annual number of graduates increased from 36 to 79. Multivariate analysis identified statutory (non-private) health insurance (OR 7.6, CI 4.6–12.5), right colon resection (OR 3.5, CI 2.5–4.7), tertiary referral center (OR 1.9, CI 1.5–2.6), emergency surgery (OR 1.7, CI 1.3–2.3), and earlier date of surgery (OR 1.1, CI 1.0–1.1) as predictors for resident involvement.

Conclusions

Only a low and declining percentage of colectomies is used for resident training, despite growing numbers of trainees. These data imply that opportunities to obtain technical proficiency have diminished since the implementation of working-hour directives, indicating the need to better utilize suitable teaching opportunities, to ensure that technical proficiency remains high.

Keywords

Education Surgical training Resident Colon Resection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the ACQ (Swiss association for quality management in surgery; Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie) for providing the data to perform this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Watson DR, Flesher TD, Ruiz O, Chung JS (2010) Impact of the 80-hour workweek on surgical case exposure within a general surgery residency program. J Surg Educ 67(5):283–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.07.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwartz SI, Galante J, Kaji A, Dolich M, Easter D, Melcher ML, Patel K, Reeves ME, Salim A, Senagore AJ, Takanishi DM Jr, de Virgilio C (2013) Effect of the 16-hour work limit on general surgery intern operative case volume: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Surg 148(9):829–833.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2677 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlin AM, Gasevic E, Shepard AD (2007) Effect of the 80-hour work week on resident operative experience in general surgery. Am J Surg 193(3):326–329; discussion 329-330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Businger AP, Laffer U, Kaderli R (2012) Resident work hour restrictions do not improve patient safety in surgery: a critical appraisal based on 7 years of experience in Switzerland. Patient Saf Surg 6(1):17.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-6-17 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):217–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):829–840.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3348-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moore J, Pellet A, Hyman N (2016) Laparoscopic colectomy and the general surgeon. J Gastrointest Surg 20(3):640–643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2943-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moloo H, Haggar F, Martel G, Grimshaw J, Coyle D, Graham ID, Sabri E, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Balaa FK, Boushey RP (2009) The adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a national survey of general surgeons. Can J Surg 52(6):455–462PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prystowsky JB, Bordage G, Feinglass JM (2002) Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon’s training, certification, and experience. Surgery 132(4):663–670 discussion 670-662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karanicolas PJ, Dubois L, Colquhoun PH, Swallow CJ, Walter SD, Guyatt GH (2009) The more the better?: the impact of surgeon and hospital volume on in-hospital mortality following colorectal resection. Ann Surg 249(6):954–959.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77bcd CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drolet S, MacLean AR, Myers RP, Shaheen AA, Dixon E, Buie WD (2011) Elective resection of colon cancer by high-volume surgeons is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 15(4):541–550.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1433-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    SIWF (2012) Facharzt für Chirurgie Weiterbildungsprogramm vom 1. Juli 2006 (revision 2. Mai 2012). http://www.fmh.ch/files/pdf19/chirurgie_version_internet_d.pdf. Accessed 10th of January 2017
  14. 14.
    AQC Website. Available via AQC. http://www.aqc.ch/Willkommen-bei-der-AQC.aspx. Accessed 11th of February 2018 2018
  15. 15.
    SIWF FMH-Ärztestatistik. Available via FNH. http://www.fmh.ch. Accessed 11th of February 2018 2018
  16. 16.
    Bevölkerungstatistik Schweiz. BFS. Available via BFS. http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerung.html. Accessed 11th of February 2018
  17. 17.
    Ahmed N, Devitt KS, Keshet I, Spicer J, Imrie K, Feldman L, Cools-Lartigue J, Kayssi A, Lipsman N, Elmi M, Kulkarni AV, Parshuram C, Mainprize T, Warren RJ, Fata P, Gorman MS, Feinberg S, Rutka J (2014) A systematic review of the effects of resident duty hour restrictions in surgery: impact on resident wellness, training, and patient outcomes. Ann Surg 259(6):1041–1053.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000595 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Massarotti H, Rodrigues F, O’Rourke C, Chadi SA, Wexner S (2017) Impact of surgeon laparoscopic training and case volume of laparoscopic surgery on conversion during elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Color Dis 19(1):76–85.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schoetz DJ (2012) The American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 25(3):166–170.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1322554 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krishna A, Russell M, Richardson GL, Rickard MJ, Keshava A (2013) Supervised surgical training and its effect on the short-term outcome in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Color Dis 15(8):e483–e487.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Renwick AA, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Zelas P, Stewart PJ, Rickard MJ, Dent OF (2005) Effect of supervised surgical training on outcomes after resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(5):631–636.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4935 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nijhof HW, Silvis R, Vuylsteke R, Oosterling SJ, Rijna H, Stockmann H (2017) Training residents in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is supervised surgery safe? Surg Endosc 31(6):2602–2606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5268-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Axt S, Johannink J, Storz P, Mees ST, Roth AA, Kirschniak A (2016) Surgical training in Germany: desire and reality. Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie 141(3):290–296.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-102966 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel A. Käser
    • 1
  • Andreas Rickenbacher
    • 1
  • Daniela Cabalzar-Wondberg
    • 1
  • Marcel Schneider
    • 1
  • Daniel Dietrich
    • 2
  • Benjamin Misselwitz
    • 3
  • Pierre-Alain Clavien
    • 1
  • Matthias Turina
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital ZurichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)BernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations