Nadir/pre-chemoradiotherapy ratio of white blood-cell count can predict tumor response and recurrence-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multi-institutional analysis
- 89 Downloads
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether change of white blood-cell (WBC) count before and during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) might be associated with susceptibility to radiation and tumor response.
Medical records of 641 patients with rectal cancer who received preoperative CRT followed by curative surgery were retrospectively reviewed in five tertiary centers. Complete blood cell with differential count was measured weekly during the period of CRT. We assessed nadir/pre-CRT ratio of WBC count as a predictor for tumor response to CRT and a prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival.
Enrolled patients were divided into low WBC ratio (LWR) and high WBC ratio (HWR) arms with cut-off value of 0.49 calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve. Of 641 patients, 490 (76.4%) and 151 (23.6%) were categorized into HWR (> 0.49) arm and LWR (≤ 0.49) arms, respectively. Complete pathologic response rate after CRT was significantly higher in LWR arm than that in HWR arm (23.8% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.001). In logistic regression analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level over 5 ng/ml [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.566, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.351–0.912; p = 0.019) and HWR (adjusted OR 0.412, 95% CI 0.256–0.663; p = 0.001) were significantly negative factors of pathologic complete response. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the LWR group than that in the HWR group (83.3% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.001).
Low nadir/pre-chemoradiotherapy ratio during preoperative CRT can predict good tumor response. It is significantly associated with improved recurrence-free survival in rectal cancer.
KeywordsChemoradiation Rectal cancer Response White blood cell
Statistical analyses performed in this article were advised by Catholic Medical Center Clinical Research Coordinating Center.
Compliance with ethical standards
Each center obtained approval from respective Institutional Review Board before enrolling patients.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Song JH, Jeong JU, Lee JH, Kim SH, Cho HM, Um JW, Jang HS, Korean Clinical Practice Guideline for Colon and Rectal Cancer Committee (2017) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiat Oncol J 35:198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Gérard J-P, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouché O, Chapet O, Closon-Dejardin MT, Untereiner M, Leduc B, Francois É, Maurel J, Seitz JF, Buecher B, Mackiewicz R, Ducreux M, Bedenne L (2006) Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 24:4620–4625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Collette L, Bosset JF, den Dulk M, Nguyen F, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Piérart M, Calais G, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiation Oncology Group (2007) Patients with curative resection of cT3-4 rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: does anybody benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy? A trial of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer radiation oncology group. J Clin Oncol 25:4379–4386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R, German Rectal Cancer Study Group (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, Crane CH, Capirci C, Rödel C, Nash GM, Kuo LJ, Glynne-Jones R, García-Aguilar J, Suárez J, Calvo FA, Pucciarelli S, Biondo S, Theodoropoulos G, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL (2015) Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer: defining subgroups who may benefit after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and resection: a pooled analysis of 3,313 patients. Int J Cancer 137:212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, Das P, Rödel C, Kuo LJ, Calvo FA, García-Aguilar J, Glynne-Jones R, Haustermans K, Mohiuddin M, Pucciarelli S, Small W Jr, Suárez J, Theodoropoulos G, Biondo S, Beets-Tan RGH, Beets GL (2010) Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol 11:835–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fankhauser CD, Sander S, Roth L, Gross O, Eberli D, Sulser T, Seifert B, Beyer J, Hermanns T (2018) Systemic inflammatory markers have independent prognostic value in patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumours undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 118:825–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Caputo D, Caricato M, Coppola A, la Vaccara V, Fiore M, Coppola R (2016) Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (d-NLR) predict non-responders and postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical surgery after neo-adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Investig 34:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2016.1229332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar