Abstract
Purpose
Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) is the best option for complex anal fistula (AF) treatment. Recurrence is not rare and the best surgical option for his handling is a challenge considering the incontinence risk and the healing rate. We aimed to determine the feasibility and outcomes of a second MAF for recurrent complex AF previously treated with mucosal advancement flap.
Methods
We retrospectively identified 32 patients undergoing two or more MAF for recurrent AF in a larger cohort of 121 consecutive cases of MAF operated by the same senior colorectal surgeon. Only complex AF of cryptoglandular origin was enrolled. A long-term follow-up was performed collecting clinical and functional data.
Results
Among 121 patients (group A) treated with mucosal advancement flap, 32 (26.4%) (group B) recurred with a complex AF requiring a second mucosal advancement flap procedure. Success rate of group B is 78.1%. Six patients of group B recurred a second time, another MAF was performed with healing in all cases. Complication rate (Clavien Dindo 3b) of group B is 9.4% compared to 8.3% of group A. A slight continence deficit (Miller score 1, 2, and 4) was detected after the first MAF in 3 patients. The Miller score for these patients did not change after the subsequent MAF.
Conclusions
MAF is effective for treatment of complex recurrent AF. A pre-existing MAF procedure does not worsen the healing rate of the second flap. The rate of surgical complications is similar with those reported in the literature for MAFs.
Change history
20 December 2018
The name of the second author of this article was incorrectly presented as “Riccardo Scarpa Cosimo” this should have been “Cosimo Riccardo Scarpa”.
References
Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL (2011) Practice parameters for the management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 54(12):1465–1474
Uribe N, Millán M, Minguez M (2007) Clinical and manometric results of endorectal advancement flaps for complex anal fistula. Int J Color Dis 22(3):259–264
Schouten WR, Zimmerman DD, Briel (1999) Transanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 42(11):1419–1422 discussion 1422-3
Ortíz H, Marzo J (2000) Endorectal flap advancement repair and fistulectomy for high trans-sphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas. Br J Surg 87(12):1680–1683
Uribe N, Balciscueta Z, Mínguez M, Martín MC, López M, Mora F, Primo V (2015) “Core out” or “curettage” in rectal advancement flap for cryptoglandular anal fistula. Int J Color Dis 30(5):613–619
Wedell J, Meier zu Eissen P et al (1987) Sliding flap advancement for the treatment of high level fistulae. Br J Surg 74(5):390–391
Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O, Silva GD, Efron J, Weiss EG, Vernava AM III, Nogueras JJ (2002) Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45(12):1616–1621
Ommer A, Wenger FA, Rolfs T, Walz MK (2008) Continence disorders after anal surgery--a relevant problem? Int J Color Dis 23(11):1023–1031
Mitalas LE, Gosselink MP, Zimmerman DD et al (2007) Repeat transanal advancement flap repair: impact on the overall healing rate of high transsphincteric fistulas and on fecal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 50(10):1508–1511
Miller R, Bartolo DC, Locke-Edmunds JC et al (1988) Prospective study of conservative and operative treatment for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 75(2):101–105
Christoforidis D, Pieh MC, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF (2009) Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by endorectal advancement flap or collagen fistula plug: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 52(1):18–22
Fisher OM, Raptis DA, Vetter D, Novak A, Dindo D, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA, Nocito A (2015) An outcome and cost analysis of anal fistula plug insertion vs endorectal advancement flap for complex anal fistulae. Color Dis 17(7):619–626
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised: The name of the second author of this article was incorrectly presented as “Riccardo Scarpa Cosimo” this should have been “Cosimo Riccardo Scarpa”.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Podetta, M., Scarpa, C.R., Zufferey, G. et al. Mucosal advancement flap for recurrent complex anal fistula: a repeatable procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 197–200 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3155-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3155-y