Clinical significance of appendiceal diverticulum: a significant marker for appendiceal neoplasia in Australian patients
- 110 Downloads
Diverticula of the appendix (DA) have a reported incidence of up to 2.1%. They are primarily detected incidentally, through imaging and intraoperative or histologic diagnosis. This study’s objective was to examine the prevalence of DA, and its relationship with inflammation and neoplasia, as well as review the literature with respect to clinical outcomes and ability to identify DA preoperatively.
A retrospective search of all patients undergoing an appendicectomy for right lower quadrant pain at a single institution between 2004 and 2017 was conducted. Histopathology reports for evidence of DA, location of the DA, presence of inflammation, and any relationship between DA and neoplasms (adenoma, carcinoma, carcinoid, lymphoma, and mucinous neoplasm) within the appendix were reviewed. Clinical notes, operative records, and preoperative imaging were also reviewed.
Two thousand seven hundred eleven patient were included in the study, with a mean age of 34 years, with acute appendicitis found in 82.5%. 31.6% of patients with DA had associated inflammation of the DA. DA was present in 57 patients (2.1%), with 55 patients in the total cohort having neoplasia (2.0%). Patients with DAs were ten times more likely to have appendicular neoplasm than patients without a DA (17.5 vs 1.8%; p < 0.0001, OR 11.8 95%, CI 5.6–24.8).
This is the first Australian study demonstrating DAs are a significant marker of appendiceal neoplasm. Appendicectomy in all incidentally discovered diverticulum should be considered. Due to a paucity of data, research is required into this area to assess for the need for endoscopy following diagnosis.
KeywordsAppendix Diverticulum Neoplasms General surgery Appendectomy
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethics approval was granted by the South Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee, reference LNR/17/LPOOL/300, and this study was performed in accordance with standards laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 4.Lamps LW, Gray GF Jr, Dilday BR, Washington MK (2000) The coexistence of low-grade mucinous neoplasms of the appendix and appendiceal diverticula: a possible role in the pathogenesis of pseudomyxoma peritonei. Mod Pathol 13(5):495–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880086 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.AIHW (2012) Australian hospital statistics 2010–2011. CanberraGoogle Scholar
- 12.Yardimci AH, Bektas CT, Pasaoglu E, Kinaci E, Ozer C, Sevinc MM, Mahmutoglu AS, Kilickesmez O (2017) Retrospective study of 24 cases of acute appendiceal diverticulitis: CT findings and pathological correlations. Jpn J Radiol 35(5):225–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-017-0625-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar