International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 763–769 | Cite as

Reappraisal of the lateral rectal ligament: an anatomical study of total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation

  • Masayuki IshiiEmail author
  • Atsushi Shimizu
  • Alan Kawarai Lefor
  • Yujirou Kokado
  • Hideaki Nishigori
  • Yasuko Noda
Original Article



The term “lateral rectal ligament” in surgery for rectal cancer has caused confusion regarding its true existence and contents. In previous studies, investigators claimed the existence of the ligament and described its topographical features as neurovascular structures and their surrounding connective tissues located at the anterolateral aspect of the distal rectum or the posterolateral aspect of the middle rectum. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the structure of the so-called “lateral rectal ligament” in cadaver dissections.


Dissection was performed in nine cadavers (eight males and one female, aged 73 to 94 years) in accordance with typical total mesorectal excision techniques. During dissection, structures related to “the ligament” were examined and images recorded.


At the anterolateral aspect of the distal rectum, the middle rectal artery was noted to be crossing the fusion of Denonvilliers’ fascia and the proper rectal fascia. At the posterolateral aspect of the middle rectum, there was a structure which consisted of the rectal nerves running through the fusion of the pelvic fasciae. Although called “ligaments,” neither structure contained discrete strong connective tissue fixing the rectum to the pelvic wall.


The proper rectal fascia and surrounding pelvic fasciae fuse firmly anterolaterally and posterolaterally where neurovascular structures course toward the rectum. During a total mesorectal excision, the surgical dissection plane coincides with the fused part of the fasciae, which had long been considered the “lateral rectal ligament.”


Lateral rectal ligament Total mesorectal excision Autonomic nerve preservation Pelvic anatomy 


Authors’ contributions

MI made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition, and analysis and interpretation of data. AS contributed to analysis and interpretation of data and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. All other authors have contributed to data interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors gave final approval of the version to be submitted.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Jichi Medical University Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent for cadaver donation was obtained from every family of the cadaver.

Supplementary material


(MP4 48028 kb)


(MP4 32590 kb)


  1. 1.
    Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 28:1479–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacFarlane RRD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341:457–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bissett IP, Hill GL (2000) Extrafascial excision of the rectum for cancer: a technique for the avoidance of the complications of rectal mobilization. Semin Surg Oncol 18:207–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nano M, Dal Corso HM, Lanfranco G, Ferronato M, Hornung JP (2000) Contribution to the surgical anatomy of the ligaments of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1592–1597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takahashi T, Ueno M, Azekura K, Otha H (2000) Lateral ligament: its anatomy and clinical importance. Semin Surg Oncol 19:386–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones OM, Smeulders N, Wiseman O, Miller R (1999) Lateral ligaments of the rectum: an anatomical study. Br J Surg 86:487–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Havenga K, Deruiter MC, Enker WE, Welvaart K (1996) Anatomical basis of nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:384–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asoglu O, Matlin T, Karanlik H et al (2009) Impact of laparoscopic surgery on bladder and sexual function after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23:296–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe HC, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92:1124–1132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Runkel N, Reiser H (2013) Nerve-oriented mesorectal excision (NOME): autonomic nerves as landmarks for laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Color Dis 28:1367–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou H, Ruan C, Sun Y, Zhang J, Wang Z, Hu Z (2015) Nerve-guided laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for distal rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:550–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clausen N, Wolloscheck T, Konerding MA (2008) How to optimize autonomic nerve preservation in total mesorectal excision: clinical topography and morphology of pelvic nerves and fasciae. World J Surg 32:1768–1775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pak-art R, Tansatit T, Mingmalairaks C, Pattana-arun J, Tansatit M, Vajrabukka T (2005) The location and contents of the lateral ligaments of the rectum: a study in human soft cadavers. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1941–1944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin M, Chen W, Huang L, Ni J, Yin L (2010) The anatomy of lateral ligament of the rectum and its role in total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 34:594–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muntean V (1999) The surgical anatomy of the fasciae and the fascial spaces related to the rectum. Surg Radiol Anat 21:319–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang C, Ding ZH, Li GX, Yu J, Wang YN, Hu YF (2010) Perirectal fascia and spaces: annular distribution pattern around the mesorectum. Dis Colon rectum 53:1315–1322Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fernandez-Represa JA, Mayol JM, Garcia-Aguilar J (2004) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the truth lies underneath. World J Surg 28:113–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keighley M, Williams NA (2008) Management of carcinoma of the rectum. In: Houston M (ed) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1146–1149Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walsh PC (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sato K, Sato T (1991) The vascular and neuronal composition of the lateral ligament of the rectum and the rectosacral fascia. Surg Radiol Anat 13:17–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    García-Armengol J, García-Botello S, Martinez-Soriano F, Roig JV, Lledó S (2008) Review of the anatomic concepts in relation to the retrorectal space and endopelvic fascia: Waldeyer’s fascia and the rectosacral fascia. Color Dis 10:298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jin ZM, Peng JY, Zhu QC, Yin L (2011) Waldeyer’s fascia: anatomical location and relationship to neighboring fasciae in retrorectal space. Surg Radiol Anat 33:851–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Church JM, Raudkivi PJ, Hill GL (1987) The surgical anatomy of the rectum—a review with particular relevance to the hazards of rectal mobilisation. Int J Color Dis 2:158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Diop M, Parratte B, Tatu L, Vuillier F, Brunelle S, Monnier G (2003) “Mesorectum”: the surgical value of an anatomical approach. Surg Radiol Anat 25:290–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kraime AC, West NP, Treanor D, Magee DR, Rutten HJ, Quirke P, DeRuiter MC, van de Velde CJH (2015) Understanding the surgical pitfalls in total mesorectal excision: investigating the histology of the perirectal fascia and the pelvic autonomic nerves. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:1621–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kinugasa Y, Murakami G, Suzuki D, Sugihara K (2007) Histological identification of fascial structures posterolateral to the rectum. Br J Surg 94:620–626CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Imai K, Furuya K, Kawada M (2006) Human pelvic extramural ganglion cells: a semiquantitative and immunohistochemical study. Surg Radiol Anat 28:596–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wiig JN, Heald JR (1997) Rectal and pelvic anatomy with emphasis on anatomical layers. In: Søreide O, Norstein J (eds) Rectal cancer surgery. Springer, Berlin, pp p117–p122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kusunoki M, Inoue Y, Yanagi H (2008) Simplification of total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis for middle and lower rectal cancer: one surgeon’s experience. Surg Today 38:691–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Takenaka A, Murakami G, Soga H, Han SH, Arai Y, Fujisawa M (2004) Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172:1032–1035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Costello AJ, Dowdle BW, Namdarian B, Pedersen J, Murphy DG (2011) Immunohistochemical study of the cavernous nerves in the periprostatic region. BJU Int 107:1210–1215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Walsh PC, Donker PJ (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128:492–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T, Tomita K, Yonemasu H, Nakamura M, Oda Y, Naito S, Hasegawa Y (2004) Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:463–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E, Horninger W, Peschel R, Bartsch G, Vaughan ED (2006) The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98:314–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A, Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Bach T, Wieland WF, Denzinger S (2008) Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry. Eur Urol 54:353–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Michl U et al (2007) Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur Urol 51:105–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masayuki Ishii
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Atsushi Shimizu
    • 3
  • Alan Kawarai Lefor
    • 3
  • Yujirou Kokado
    • 2
  • Hideaki Nishigori
    • 2
  • Yasuko Noda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Bio-imaging and Neuro-cell ScienceJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
  2. 2.Colorectal and Pelvic Surgery DivisionShinko HospitalKobeJapan
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan

Personalised recommendations