Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon’s experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si
- 819 Downloads
The aim of this study is to compare surgical parameters and the costs of robotic surgery with those of laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer based on a single surgeon’s early robotic experience.
Data from 25 laparoscopic (LapTME) and the first 50 robotic (RobTME) rectal resections performed at our institution by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon (>100 procedures) between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Patient demographic, procedure, and outcome data were gathered. Costs of the two procedures were collected, differentiated into fixed and variable costs, and analyzed against the robotic learning curve according to the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method.
Based on CUSUM analysis, RobTME group was divided into three phases (Rob1: 1–19; Rob2: 20–40; Rob3: 41–50). Overall median operative time (OT) was significantly lower in LapTME than in RobTME (270 vs 312.5 min, p = 0.006). A statistically significant change in OT by phase of robotic experience was detected in the RobTME group (p = 0.010). Overall mean costs associated with LapTME procedures were significantly lower than with RobTME (p < 0.001). Statistically significant reductions in variable and overall costs were found between robotic phases (p < 0.009 for both). With fixed costs excluded, the difference between laparoscopic and Rob3 was no longer statistically significant.
Our results suggest a significant optimization of robotic rectal surgery’s costs with experience. Efforts to reduce the dominant fixed cost are recommended to maintain the sustainability of the system and benefit from the technical advantages offered by the robot.
KeywordsRobotic surgery Colorectal surgery Learning curve Cumulative sum analysis
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors declare that no funding support was received for this study.
Professor Luca Morelli, Dr. Simone Guadagni, Dr. Valentina Lorenzoni, Dr. Gregorio Di Franco, Dr. Luigi Cobuccio, Dr. Matteo Palmeri, Dr. Giovanni Caprili, Dr. Cristiano D’Isidoro, Dr. Andrea Moglia, Dr. Vincenzo Ferrari, Professor Giulio Di Candio, Professor Franco Mosca, and Professor Giuseppe Turchetti have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
- 1.Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomized clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLORII): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, Dankelman J, Forgione A, Langø T, Melzer A, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Rhodes M, Satava R, Tang CN, Vilallonga R, European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (2015) European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc 29(2):253–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24(11):2888–2894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Morelli L, Ceccarelli C, Di Franco G, Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Marciano E, Pollina L, Campani D, Massimetti G, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2015) Sexual and urinary functions after robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis Jul 7, 2015Google Scholar
- 25.Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Pisano R, Marciano E, Moglia A, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2015) Short-term clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection and low rectal resection with double-stapling technique for cancer: a case-matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis, May 16, 2015Google Scholar
- 32.Turchetti G, Pierotti F, Palla I, Manetti S, Freschi C, Ferrari V, Cuschieri A (2016) Comparative Health Technology Assessment of robotic-assisted, direct manual laparoscopic and open surgery: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 2016 [in press]Google Scholar
- 38.Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Pisano R, Moglia A, Ferrari V, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2015) Use of the new Da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: technical considerations and early experience. Int J Color Dis 30(9):1281–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Morelli L, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Cobuccio L, Marciano E, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2016) Use of the new da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si®. Int J Med Robot Jan 25, 2016Google Scholar