Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 1005–1010 | Cite as

Sacral nerve stimulation—hidden costs (uncovered)

  • M. Zeiton
  • Sara Faily
  • James Nicholson
  • Karen Telford
  • Abhiram SharmaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study is to determine the occurrence of surgical revision in a cohort of patients treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for faecal incontinence and constipation and to establish the types of procedures performed and indications for surgery.

Method

From the years 2002 to 2014, 125 patients were identified who had undergone permanent SNS therapy with 36 (28.8 %) patients requiring surgical intervention postimplantation. These cases were retrospectively reviewed (range of follow-up 1–99 months).

Results

Over a total of 1512 months of SNS treatment, 51 unplanned surgical procedures were required in 36 patients. At present, 48 procedures have been performed at an average of 2.6 years following implantation and three patients are awaiting surgery. Lead-related problems accounted for 30 (58.8 %) procedures at an average of 1.7 years affecting 22 patients. Battery and implantable pulse generator-related problems attributed to 13 procedures (25.5 %) in 12 patients at an average of 5.0 years. Battery depletion occurred in seven patients at an average of 5.4 years. Surgical revision was required to replace, remove, or resite various components of the SNS system. Indications for surgery included lead damage, pain and loss or lack of SNS efficacy. Explantation was warranted in six patients due to poor SNS efficacy, pain, infection and facilitation of a magnetic resonance imaging scan. This was performed at an average of 1.6 years.

Conclusion

A considerable proportion of patients treated with SNS therapy require surgical revision. These unplanned procedures are associated with substantial unexpected costs that financially burden SNS services.

Keywords

Sacral nerve stimulation Hidden costs Complications 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standard

Conflict of interest

The authors have read and understood International Journal of Colorectal Disease policy on declaration of interests and declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Meurette G, Duchalais E, Lehur PA (2014) Surgical approaches to fecal incontinence in the adult. J Visc Surg 151(1):29–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norderval S, Rydningen M, Lindsetmo R-O, Lein D, Vonen B (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation. Tidsskrift for den Norske lageforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny rakke 131(12):1190–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA (1982) Bladder pacemaker—scientific basis and clinical future. Urology 20(6):614–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharma A, Bussen D, Herold A, Jayne D (2013) Review of sacral neuromodulation for management of constipation. Surg Innov 20(6):614–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leng WW, Chancellor MB (2005) How sacral nerve stimulation neuromodulation works. Urol Clin North Am 32(1):11, +CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaker HS, Hassouna M (1998) Sacral root neuromodulation in idiopathic nonobstructive chronic urinary retention. J Urol 159(5):1476–1478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gourcerol G, Vitton V, Leroi AM, Michot F, Abysique A, Bouvier M (2011) How sacral nerve stimulation works in patients with faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 13(8):E203–E211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wong MTC, Meurette G, Rodat F, Regenet N, Wyart V, Lehur P-A (2011) Outcome and management of patients in whom sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence failed. Dis Colon Rectum 54(4):425–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dudding TC, Hollingshead JR, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: optimizing outcome and managing complications. Colorectal Dis 13(8):E196–E202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Hull T, McCallum R, Chan M et al (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 251(3):441–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maeda Y, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation: suboptimal outcome and adverse events. Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):995–999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Das AK, White MD, Longhurst PA (2000) Sacral nerve stimulation for the management of voiding dysfunction. Rev Urology 2(1):43–60Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faucheron JL, Voirin D, Badic B (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: causes of surgical revision from a series of 87 consecutive patients operated on in a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 53(11):1501–1507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2007) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations. Colorectal Dis 9(8):725–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benson JT (2000) Sacral nerve stimulation results may be improved by electrodiagnostic techniques. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11(6):352–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hijaz A, Vasavada SP, Daneshgari F, Frinjari H, Goldman H, Rackley R (2006) Complications and troubleshooting of two-stage sacral neuromodulation therapy: a single-institution experience. Urology 68(3):533–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Medtronic: Instruction for Use Manual. “Interstim® Therapy,” Model 3058 and 3023, system eligibility, battery longevity, specifications ( 32 pages) Reprints available from manufacturer.; 2006.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Datta SN, Chaliha C, Singh A, Gonzales G, Mishra VC, Kavia RBC et al (2008) Sacral neurostimulation for urinary retention: 10-year experience from one UK centre. BJU Int 101(2):192–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dudding TC, Lee EM, Faiz O, Pares D, Vaizey CJ, McGuire A et al (2008) Economic evaluation of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 95(9):1155–1163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deng DY, Gulati M, Rutman M, Raz S, Rodriguez LV (2006) Failure of sacral nerve stimulation due to migration of tined lead. J Urol 175(6):2182–2185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Michelsen HB, Thompson-Fawcett M, Lundby L, Krogh K, Laurberg S, Buntzen S (2010) Six years of experience with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53(4):414–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wexner SD, Hull T, Edden Y, Coller JA, Devroede G, McCallum R et al (2010) Infection rates in a large investigational trial of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. J Gastrointest Surg 14(7):1081–1088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Elkelini MS, Hassouna MM (2006) Safety of MRI at 1.5 Tesla in patients with implanted sacral nerve neurostimulator. Eur Urol 50(2):311–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Henderson JM, Tkach J, Phillips M, Baker K, Shellock FG, Rezai AR (2005) Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report. Neurosurgery 57(5):E1063, E; discussion ECrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jarrett MED, Mowatt G, Glazener CMA, Fraser C, Nicholls RJ, Grant AM et al (2004) Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg 91(12):1559–1569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hollingshead JRF, Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: results from a single centre over a 10-year period. Colorectal Dis 13(9):1030–1034CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Altomare DF, Ratto C, Ganio E, Lolli P, Masin A, Villani RD (2009) Long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 52(1):11–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Matzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, Besendorfer M, Zhang W (2009) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 11(6):636–641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Altomare DF1, Rinaldi M, Lobascio P, Marino F, Giuliani RT, Cuccia F (2011) Factors affecting the outcome of temporary sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. The value of the new tined lead electrode. Colorectal Dis 13(2):198–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hetzer FH, Bieler A, Hahnloser D, Lohlein F, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2006) Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 93(11):1411–1417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Zeiton
    • 1
  • Sara Faily
    • 2
  • James Nicholson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karen Telford
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abhiram Sharma
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Colorectal SurgeryUniversity Hospital of South Manchester NHS TrustManchesterUK
  2. 2.University of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital of South Manchester and MAHSC, University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations