Risk factors for surgical site infection following colorectal resection: a multi-institutional study
- 424 Downloads
Surgical site infection (SSI) is an infection occurring in an incisional wound within 30 days of surgery and significantly affects patients undergoing colorectal surgery. This study examined a multi-institutional dataset to determine risk factors for SSI following colorectal resection.
Data on 386 patients who underwent colorectal resection in three institutions were accrued. Patients were identified using a prospective SSI database and hospital records. Data are presented as median (interquartile range), and logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors.
Patients (21.5 %) developed a postoperative SSI. The median time to the development of SSI was 7 days (5–10). Of all infections, 67.5 % were superficial, 22.9 % were deep and 9.6 % were organ space. In univariate analysis, an ASA grade of II (RR 0.6, CI 0.3–0.9, P = 0.019), having an elective procedure (RR 0.4, CI 0.2–0.6, P < 0.001), using a laparoscopic approach (RR 0.5, CI 0.3–0.9, P = 0.019), having a daytime procedure (RR 0.3, CI 0.1–0.7, P = 0.006) and having a clean/contaminated wound (RR 0.4, CI 0.2–0.7, P = 0.001) were associated with reduced risk of SSI. In multivariate analysis, an ASA grade of IV (RR 3.9, CI 1.1–13.7, P = 0.034), a procedure duration over 3 h (RR 4.3, CI 2.3–8.2, P < 0.001) and undergoing a panproctocolectomy (RR 6.5, CI 1.0–40.9, P = 0.044) were independent risk factors for SSI. Those who developed an SSI had a longer duration of inpatient stay (22 days [16–31] vs 15 days [10–26], P < 0.001).
Patients who develop an SSI have a longer duration of inpatient stay. Independent risk factors for SSI following colorectal resection include being ASA grade IV, having a procedure duration over 3 h, and undergoing a panproctocolectomy.
KeywordsSurgical site infection Colorectal surgery Wound infection Risk
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
None to declare
- 5.Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27(2):97–132, quiz 3-4; discussion 96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Anthony T, Murray BW, Sum-Ping JT, Lenkovsky F, Vornik VD, Parker BJ et al (2011) Evaluating an evidence-based bundle for preventing surgical site infection: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 146(3):263–269Google Scholar
- 19.Degrate L, Garancini M, Misani M, Poli S, Nobili C, Romano F et al (2010) Right colon, left colon, and rectal surgeries are not similar for surgical site infection development. Analysis of 277 elective and urgent colorectal resections. Int J Color DisGoogle Scholar
- 30.Belda FJ, Aguilera L, Garcia de la Asuncion J, et al. (2005) Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. Jama 294(16):2035–42Google Scholar
- 31.Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R (1996) Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 334(19):1209–15Google Scholar