Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 161–173 | Cite as

Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted colectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Laura Lorenzon
  • Fabiano Bini
  • Genoveffa Balducci
  • Mario Ferri
  • Pier Federico Salvi
  • Franco Marinozzi
Review

Abstract

Purpose

Lately, the main technical innovations in the field of colorectal surgery have been the introduction of laparoscopic and robotic techniques; the aim of this study is to investigate the results and the advantages of these two surgical approaches.

Methods

Twenty-two studies including 1652 laparoscopic and 1120 robotic-assisted resections were analyzed and categorized into right, left, and pelvic resections of the middle/low rectum, aiming to the following outcomes: operating time, blood loss, bowel function recovery, return to oral intake, morbidity, hospital stay, and costs.

Results

The vast majority of the studies were non-randomized investigations (19/22 studies) enrolling small cohorts of patients (median 55.0 laparoscopic and 34.5 robotic-assisted group) with a mean age of 62.2–61.0 years. Funnel plot analysis documented heterogeneity in studies which combined cancers and benign diseases.

Our meta-analysis demonstrated a significant difference in favor of laparoscopic procedures regarding costs and operating time (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.686 and 0.493) and in favor of robotic surgery concerning morbidity rate (odds ratio (OR) 0.763), although no benefits were documented when analyzing exclusively randomized trials. When we differentiated approaches by side of resections, a significant difference was found in favor of the laparoscopic group when analyzing operating time in left-sided and pelvic procedures (SMD 0.609 and 0.529) and blood loss in pelvic resections (SMD 0.339).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic techniques were documented as the shorter procedures, which provided lower blood loss in pelvic resections, while morbidity rate was more favorable in robotic surgery. However, these results could not be confirmed when we focused the analysis on randomized trials only.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer Laparoscopy Robotic surgery Meta-analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Michael Gerald Kenyon for his help in editing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential financial conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN Guidelines – Colon cancer, version 1.2013. www.nccn.org.
  2. 2.
    Bernell O, Lapidus A, Hellers G (2000) Risk factors for surgery and postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg 231(1):38–45PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jafferji MS, Hyman N (2014) Surgeon, not disease severity, often determines the operation for acute complicated diverticulitis. J Am Coll Surg 218(6):1156–1161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Talamini M, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin W (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17:1521–1524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jacquet P, Averbach AM, Jacquet N (1995) Abdominal wall metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 21:568–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Akle CA (1996) Early parietal recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the colon after laparoscopic colectomy. Port site metastasis after laparascopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 83:427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wexner SD, Cohen SM (1995) Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82:295–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramos JM, Gupta S, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Simons AJ, Beart RW (1994) Laparoscopy and colon cancer. Is the port site at risk? A preliminary report. Arch Surg 129:897–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lorenzon L, La Torre M, Ziparo V, Montebelli F, Mercantini P, Balducci G, Ferri M (2014) Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection. World J Gastroenterol 20(13):3680–3692PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fung AK, Aly EH (2013) Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum 56(6):786–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bland JM, Kerry SM (1998) Weighted comparison of means. BMJ 316:129PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ielpo B, Caruso R, Quijano Y, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Oliva C, Olivares S, Ferri V, Ceron R, Plaza C, Vicente E (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study. Int J Med Robot. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1583 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Casillas MA Jr, Leichtle SW, Wahl WL, Lampman RM, Welch KB, Wellock T, Madden EB, Cleary RK (2013) Improved perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal operations. Am J Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.028 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez R, Anaya DA, Linda TL, Orcutt ST, Balentine CJ, Awad SA, Berger DH, Albo DA, Artinyan AA (2013) Laparoscopic versus robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in a veteran population. Am J Surg 206:509–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lim DR, Min BS, Kim MS, Alasari S, Kim G, Hur H, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27(4):1379–1385. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2619-3 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min BS, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Lee KY (2013) The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg 257(1):95–101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182686bbd CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, Mishra N, Rubach E, Zemon H, Klein JD, Denoto G 3rd (2012) Robotic vs laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc 26(4):956–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller AT, Berian JR, Rubin M, Hurst RD, Fichera A, Umanskiy K (2012) Robotic-assisted proctectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: a case-matched comparison of laparoscopic and robotic technique. J Gastrointest Surg 16(3):587–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36(11):2722–2729. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1728-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bertani E, Chiappa A, Biffi R, Bianchi PP, Radice D, Branchi V, Cenderelli E, Vetrano I, Cenciarelli S, Andreoni B (2011) Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches. Int J Color Dis 26(10):1317–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum 53:1000–1006CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17(12):3195–3202. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1162-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, Spinoglio G, Zampino MG, Sonzogni A, Crosta C, Andreoni B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24(11):2888–2894. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1134-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, Hur H, Sohn SK, Cho CH, Kim H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16(6):1480–1487. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0435-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L (2009) Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 13(2):176–183PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1627–1632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Woeste G, Bechstein WO, Wullstein C (2005) Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Int J Color Dis 20(3):253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D'Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47(12):2162–2168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1633–1639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jiménez Rodríguez RM, Díaz Pavón JM, de La Portilla de Juan F, Prendes Sillero E, Hisnard Cadet Dussort JM, Padillo J (2011) Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection. Cir Esp 89(7):432–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Erguner I, Aytac E, Boler DE, Atalar B, Baca B, Karahasanoglu T, Hamzaoglu I, Uras C (2013) What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(3):316–319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, Carpenter J, Rücker G, Harbord RM, Schmid CH, Tetzlaff J, Deeks JJ, Peters J, Macaskill P, Schwarzer G, Duval S, Altman DG, Moher D, Higgins JP (2011) Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d4002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ahmed K, Khan MS, Vats A, Nagpal K, Priest O, Patel V, Vecht JA, Ashrafian H, Yang GZ, Athanasiou T, Darzi A (2009) Current status of robotic assisted pelvic surgery and future developments. Int J Surg 7(5):431–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon's experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57(9):1066–1074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C, Cheng Y (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res 188(2):404–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pigazzi A, Garcia-Aguilar J (2010) Robotic colorectal surgery: for whom and for what? Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):969–970CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, Tsang C, Barrie JM, Edlin R, Garbett C, Guillou P, Holloway I, Howard H, Marshall H, McCabe C, Pavitt S, Quirke P, Rivers CS, Brown JM (2012) An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 27(2):233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Lorenzon
    • 1
  • Fabiano Bini
    • 2
  • Genoveffa Balducci
    • 1
  • Mario Ferri
    • 1
  • Pier Federico Salvi
    • 1
  • Franco Marinozzi
    • 2
  1. 1.Surgical and Medical Department of Traslational Medicine, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology“Sapienza” University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering“Sapienza” University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations