International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 30, Issue 11, pp 1533–1540 | Cite as

The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following anterior resection for rectal cancer demonstrate distinct characteristics and oncologic outcomes

  • Seok-Byung Lim
  • Chang Sik Yu
  • Chan Wook Kim
  • Yong Sik Yoon
  • In Ja Park
  • Jin Cheon Kim
Original Article
First Online:
Accepted:

Abstract

Purpose

The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following rectal cancer surgery and their impact on long-term outcomes are not well documented. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of various types of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection in rectal cancer patients and evaluate their impact on the long-term oncologic outcomes.

Methods

This study analyzed data obtained from 2510 consecutive patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancers. Of these patients, 141 (5.6 %) developed anastomotic leakage. Three types of leakage were categorized according to presentation: generalized peritonitis (type I), localized peritonitis (type II), and fistula or chronic sinus (type III). The clinical characteristics and oncologic outcomes were compared.

Results

Type I leakage was the most common (I 44.7 %, n = 63; II 30.5 %, n = 43; III 24.8 %, n = 35). Type III occurred more frequently in women (p = 0.001) and patients with low rectal cancer (p < 0.001). Patients with type II or III leakage more frequently underwent radiation therapy (p < 0.001) and diverting ostomy (p < 0.001). Leakage management differed according to the type of leakage (p < 0.001). The local recurrence-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with type II and III leakage (p = 0.014).

Conclusions

The clinical characteristics and oncologic results are distinct for each type of anastomotic leakage. Only a type II or III leakage increases the risk of local recurrence. Each type of leakage should thus be considered a different disease entity.

Keywords

Anastomotic leakage Type Oncologic outcome Anterior resection 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Conflicts of interest and funding sources

None to declare.

References

  1. 1.
    Heald RJ (1995) Total mesorectal excision is optimal surgery for rectal cancer: a Scandinavian consensus. Br J Surg 82:1297–1299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P (2002) Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 26:499–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Merkel S, Wang WY, Schmidt O, Dworak O, Wittekind C, Hohenberger W et al (2001) Locoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 3:154–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F, Schubert D, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Study Group Colon/Rectum Carcinoma (Primary Tumour) (2007) Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg 94:1548–1554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, Kim DD, Park IJ, Kim HC et al (2008) Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 51:902–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Påhlman L, Folkesson J et al (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96:1066–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2010) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 12:e76–e81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, Lindmark G (2011) Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival? Colorectal Dis 13:272–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith JD, Paty PB, Guillem JG, Temple LK, Weiser MR, Nash GM (2012) Anastomotic leak is not associated with oncologic outcome in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 256:1034–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147:339–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chambers WM, Mortensen NJ (2004) Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18:865–880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I (2010) Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12, CD006878Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morgenstern L, Sanders G, Wahlstrom E, Yadegar J, Amodeo P (1984) Effect of preoperative irradiation on healing of low colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 147:246–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matthiessen P, Hansson L, Sjödahl R, Rutegård J (2010) Anastomotic-vaginal fistula (AVF) after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer-occurrence and risk factors. Colorectal Dis 12:351–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fermor B, Umpleby HC, Lever JV, Symes MO, Williamson RC (1986) Proliferative and metastatic potential of exfoliated colorectal cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 76:347–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS (2003) Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 90:215–219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144:646–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balkwill F, Mantovani A (2001) Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 357:539–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abramovitch R, Marikovsky M, Meir G, Neeman M (1999) Stimulation of tumour growth by wound-derived growth factors. Br J Cancer 79:1392–1398PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    François A, Milliat F, Guipaud O, Benderitter M (2013) Inflammation and immunity in radiation damage to the gut mucosa. Biomed Res Int 2013:123241PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ong ZY, Gibson RJ, Bowen JM, Stringer AM, Darby JM, Logan RM et al (2010) Pro-inflammatory cytokines play a key role in the development of radiotherapy-induced gastrointestinal mucositis. Radiat Oncol 5:22PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seok-Byung Lim
    • 1
  • Chang Sik Yu
    • 1
  • Chan Wook Kim
    • 1
  • Yong Sik Yoon
    • 1
  • In Ja Park
    • 1
  • Jin Cheon Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations