Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 775–785 | Cite as

Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery

  • Minna Räsänen
  • Monika Carpelan-Holmström
  • Harri Mustonen
  • Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo
  • Anna Lepistö
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

After curative rectal cancer surgery, local recurrences manifest in 2.4–10 % and distant metastases in 20–50 % of patients. The effectiveness of different surveillance regimens is not well established. We evaluated the pattern of recurrence and the utility of different surveillance instruments. Risk factors for recurrence were also recorded.

Methods

This retrospective study comprises 580 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, during 2005–2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 481 patients treated with curative intent remained. Patients were followed up according to an intensive surveillance program.

Results

Rectal cancer recurrence was observed in 124 patients (25.8 %). Local recurrence manifested in 40 patients (8.3%) and distant metastases in 112 patients (23.3 %). Recurrences were observed a median of 1.3 years after surgery. Twelve patients had to be followed up to find one local recurrence and four patients to find one distant metastasis. Recurrences detected during regular follow-up visits were discovered on average earlier than those detected in additional visits arranged because of patient symptoms (p = 0.023 for local recurrence, p = 0.001 for distant metastases). All surveillance instruments were similarly useful in finding recurrence. Curative treatment was possible in 51 (41.1 %) of 124 patients with disease recurrence. Follow-up led to a 10.0 % chance of detecting recurrence that could be treated with curative intent.

Conclusions

Rectal cancer recurrences are detected earlier within a surveillance program than by symptoms alone. The most intensive follow-up should be focused on patients with known risk factors for recurrence.

Keywords

Rectal cancer Recurrence Follow-up Surveillance 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lemmens V, van Steenbergen L, Janssen-Heijnen M, Martijn H, Rutten H, Coebergh JW (2010) Trends in colorectal cancer in the south of the Netherlands 1975-2007: rectal cancer survival levels with colon cancer survival. Acta Oncol 49:784–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, Trama A, Visser O, Brenner H, Ardanaz E, Bielska-Lasota M, Engholm G, Nennecke A, Siesling S, Berrino F, Capocaccia R, EUROCARE-5 Working Group (2014) Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE–5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:23–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Palmer G, Martling A, Cedermark B, Holm T (2007) A population-based study on the management and outcome in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:447–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, O’Callaghan C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Thompson LC, Parmar M, Stephens RJ, Sebag-Montefiore D, MRC CR07/NCIC-CTG CO16 Trial Investigators, NCRI Colorectal Cancer Study Group (2009) Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet 373:821–828CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ding P, Liska D, Tang P, Shia J, Saltz L, Goodman K, Downey RJ, Nash GM, Temple LK, Paty PB, Guillem JG, Wong WD, Weiser MR (2012) Pulmonary recurrence predominates after combined modality therapy for rectal cancer: an original retrospective study. Ann Surg 256:111–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palmer G, Martling A, Blomqvist L, Cedermark B, Holm T (2005) Outcome after the introduction of a multimodality treatment program for locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:727–734CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1783–1799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seo SI, Lim SB, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Yu CS, Kim TW, Kim JH, Kim JC (2013) Comparison of recurrence patterns between 5 years after curative operations in colorectal cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 108:9–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Kranenbarg EK, Putter H, Wiggers T, Rutten H, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Leer JW, van de Velde CJ, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (2007) The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 246:693–701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Desch CE, Benson AB 3rd, Somerfield MR, Flynn PJ, Krause C, Loprinzi CL, Minsky BD, Pfister DG, Virgo KS, Petrelli NJ, American Society of Clinical Oncology (2005) Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 23:8512–8519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R, Ouchemi C, Grattarola M, Peracchia A (1998) Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1127–1133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Primrose JN, Perera R, Gray A, Rose P, Fuller A, Corkhill A, George S, Mant D (2014) FACS Trial Investigators, Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 311:263–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hahnloser D, Nelson H, Gunderson LL, Hassan I, Haddock MG, O’Connell MJ, Cha S, Sargent DJ, Horgan A (2003) Curative potential of multimodality therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Ann Surg 237:502–508PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tan E, Gouvas N, Nicholls RJ, Ziprin P, Xynos E, Tekkis PP (2009) Diagnostic precision of carcinoembryonic antigen in the detection of recurrence of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 18:15–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang T, Cui Y, Huang WS, Deng YH, Gong W, Li CJ, Wang JP (2009) The role of postoperative colonoscopic surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Gastrointest Endosc 69:609–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Bond JH, Brooks D, Burt RW, Byers T, Fletcher RH, Hyman N, Johnson D, Kirk L, Lieberman DA, Levin TR, O’Brien MJ, Simmang C, Thorson AG, Winawer SJ, American Cancer Society, US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American cancer society and the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 130:1865–1871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P (2008) What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 26:303–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ (1995) Anterior resection controls cancer of the rectum as well as abdominoperineal excision. Eur J Surg 161:833–839PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vironen JH, Halme L, Sainio P, Kyllonen LE, Scheinin T, Husa AI, Kellokumpu IH (2002) New approaches in the management of rectal carcinoma result in reduced local recurrence rate and improved survival. Eur J Surg 168:158–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heafner TA, Glasgow SC (2014) A critical review of the role of local excision in the treatment of early (T1 and T2) rectal tumors. J Gastrointest Oncol 5:345–352PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kennelly RP, Rogers AC, Winter DC (2013) Abdominoperineal excision study group, multicentre study of circumferential margin positivity and outcomes following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:160–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, Pathology Review Committee (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23:9257–9264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang A, Zhao H, Ling T, Quan Y, Zheng M, Feng B (2014) Oncological superiority of extralevator abdominoperineal resection over conventional abdominoperineal resection: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:321–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holm T, Ljung A, Haggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stelzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H (2011) Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer—a systematic overview. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1227–1240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shihab OC, Brown G, Daniels IR, Heald RJ, Quirke P, Moran BJ (2010) Patients with low rectal cancer treated by abdominoperineal excision have worse tumors and higher involved margin rates compared with patients treated by anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 53:53–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shin US, Yu CS, Kim JH, Kim TW, Lim SB, Yoon SN, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Kim JC (2011) Mucinous rectal cancer: effectiveness of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2232–2239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chand M, Rasheed S, Bhangu A, Stamp GW, Swift RI, Tekkis PP, Brown G (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival after TME surgery in mucinous carcinoma of the rectum. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:240–245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    How P, Shihab O, Tekkis P, Brown G, Quirke P, Heald R, Moran B (2011) A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era. Surg Oncol 20:e149–e155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    V. Cottet, V. Bouvier, F. Rollot, V. Jooste, L. Bedenne, J. Faivre, G. Launoy, A.M. (2014) Bouvier, incidence and patterns of late recurrences in rectal cancer patients, Ann. Surg. OncolGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Merkel S, Mansmann U, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P (2011) Time to locoregional recurrence after curative resection of rectal carcinoma is prolonged after neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 13:123–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Galon J, Mlecnik B, Bindea G, Angell HK, Berger A, Lagorce C, Lugli A, Zlobec I, Hartmann A, Bifulco C, Nagtegaal ID, Palmqvist R, Masucci GV, Botti G, Tatangelo F, Delrio P, Maio M, Laghi L, Grizzi F, Asslaber M, D’Arrigo C, Vidal-Vanaclocha F, Zavadova E, Chouchane L, Ohashi PS, Hafezi-Bakhtiari S, Wouters BG, Roehrl M, Nguyen L, Kawakami Y, Hazama S, Okuno K, Ogino S, Gibbs P, Waring P, Sato N, Torigoe T, Itoh K, Patel PS, Shukla SN, Wang Y, Kopetz S, Sinicrope FA, Scripcariu V, Ascierto PA, Marincola FM, Fox BA, Pages F (2014) Towards the introduction of the ‘Immunoscore’ in the classification of malignant tumours. J Pathol 232:199–209CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Minna Räsänen
    • 1
    • 5
  • Monika Carpelan-Holmström
    • 1
    • 3
  • Harri Mustonen
    • 1
    • 4
  • Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Anna Lepistö
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryHelsinki University Central HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Research Programs Unit, Genome-Scale BiologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.HUSFinland
  4. 4.HUSFinland
  5. 5.HUSFinland

Personalised recommendations