Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 397–401 | Cite as

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in high risk patients

  • G. Werkgartner
  • H. Cerwenka
  • A. El Shabrawi
  • H. Bacher
  • H. Hauser
  • H. J. Mischinger
  • M. Wagner
  • D. WagnerEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic appendectomy is widely used for the treatment of complicated appendicitis. Its use in patients with high operative risk is still on debate. The aim of the presented study was to investigate the benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with high peri- and postoperative risk factors.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent appendectomy in our center between 2006 and 2013. Patients were classified according to their preoperative risk (classification of the American Society of Anesthesia—ASA score). Only patients with ASA 3 and 4 were included and were divided into two groups—open appendectomy (OA group) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA group).

Results

The operation time was slightly longer in the LA group (p = 0.05), but hospital stay was shorter (p = 0.05). Complications graded according to the Clavien Dindo classification were slightly more frequent in patients after LA, whereas severe complications occurred more frequently in patients after OA (p = 0.01). The postoperative WBC decreased steadily and significantly in patients after OA, whereas the decrease in patients after LA was delayed (p = 0.03). CRP slightly increased after OA and decreased thereafter, whereas it steadily decreased after LA (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic appendectomy can be recommended for patients with complicated appendicitis even with higher risk categories.

Keywords

Open appendectomy Laparoscopic appendectomy Complicated appendicitis Acute appendicitis ASA classification 

Notes

Authors’ roles

Werkgartner G and Wagner D wrote and drafted the manuscript, Cerwenka H, El Shabrawi A, Bacher H, Hauser H performed the study and analyzed the data, Mischinger HJ and Wagner D designed the study, Wagner M created the database and analyzed the data

References

  1. 1.
    Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, Ohene-Yeboah M, Uranues S, Vega Rivera F, Mock C (2014) Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. BJS 101:e9–e22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Minutolo V, Licciaredello A, Di Stefano B, Arena M, Arena G, Antonacci V. Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4 years experience in a district hospital. BMC Surgery 2014 epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tannoury J, Abbound B (2013) Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults. Wold J Gastroenterol 19(25):3942–3950Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mutter D, Marescaux J (2013) Appendicitis/Diverticutlitis: Minimally invasive surgery. Dig Dis 31:76–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:2026–2040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A porspective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatment of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakhamiyayev V, Galldin L, Chiarello M, Lumba A, Gorecki PJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preffered approach for appendicitis: a retrospective review of two practice patterns. Surg Endosc 2ß1ß;24: 859–864Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Graff L, Russel J, Seashore J, Tate J, Elwell A, Prete M (2000) Flase negative and false positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: Failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery. Acad Emerg Med 7:1244–1255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP (2001) Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population based analysis. JAMA 286:1748–1753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flum DR, Koepsell T (2002) The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: Nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 137:799–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sack U, Biereder B, Elouahidi T, Bauer K, Keller T, Trobs RB (2006) Diagnostic value of blood inflammatory markers for detection of acute appendicitis in children. BMC Surg 6:15CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC (2013) Systematic review and meta analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 100:322–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dindo D, de Martines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–30CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT (2008) Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in morbidly obese. Am J Surg 196:218–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li X, Zhang J, Sang L, Zhang W, Chu Z, Li X, Liu Y (2010) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 10:129CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krisher SL, Browne A, Dibbins A, Tkacz N, Curci M (2001) Intra abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:438–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cueto J, D’Allemagne B, Váuqueu-Frias JA, Gomez S, Delgado F, Trullenque L, Fajardo R, Valencia S, Poggi L, Ballí J, Diaz J, González R, Mansur JH, Franklin ME (2006) Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 20:717–720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gupta R, Samle C, Bamehriz F, Birch DW (2006) Infectious complications following laparoscopic appendectomy. Can J Surg 49:397–400PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB (2010) Laparoscopic verus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc 24:266–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sauerland S, Lefereing R, Neugebauer E (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, DS001546Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10, CD001546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mischinger HJ, Berger A, Colombo T, Kornberger L (1989) Is the search for Meckels diverticulum still a current problem in common surgical practice? Chirurg 60:549–552Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McGrath B, Buckius MT, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2011) Economics of appendicitis: cost trend analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy from 1998 to 2008. J Surg Res 171:e161–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Werkgartner
    • 1
  • H. Cerwenka
    • 1
  • A. El Shabrawi
    • 1
  • H. Bacher
    • 1
  • H. Hauser
    • 1
  • H. J. Mischinger
    • 1
  • M. Wagner
    • 2
  • D. Wagner
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Division for General SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine, Division for EndocrinologyMedical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations