International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 19–29 | Cite as

Oncological outcomes of local excision compared with radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Irshad Shaikh
  • Alan Askari
  • Suzana Ourû
  • Janindra Warusavitarne
  • Thanos Athanasiou
  • Omar Faiz



Low rectal cancer is conventionally managed with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by radical surgery (RS). In patients who refuse a stoma or are unfit for RS, an alternative approach may be the use of pre-op CRT and local excision (LE) where tumours are responsive. The aim of this systematic review is to determine whether differences exist in local recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival between patients treated with CRT + LE and CRT + RS.


A literature search was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed/Ovid databases and Google Scholar between 1946 and 2013. Studies comparing outcome following LE and RS post-CRT were included. A pooled analysis was carried out using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical (random effects) model to identify differences in LR, OS and DFS between CRT + LE and CRT + RS.


Eight studies were suitable for pooled analyses of LR whereas five and four studies were analysed for OS and DFS, respectively. When RS was used as the reference group, LR rate was higher in the LE group. However, this was non-significant (odds ratio (OR) 1.29, confidence interval (CI) 0.72–2.31, p = 0.40). Similarly, no difference was observed in 10-year OS (OR 0.96, CI 0.38–2.43, p = 0.93) or 5-year DFS (OR 1.04, CI 0.61–1.76, p = 0.89). There was evidence of publication bias in studies used for DFS. Subgroup analysis of above outcomes in T3/any N stage cancers showed no difference in LE versus RS.


In the current evidence synthesis, there was no statistical difference in the LR, OS and DFS rates observed between patients treated with LE and RS for rectal cancer post-CRT. LE post-CRT may represent a viable alternative to RS for some patients wishing to avoid RS. However, further randomised studies are required to confirm these results.


Low rectal cancer Chemoradiotherapy Local excision TEMS Anterior resection 


  1. 1.
    Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial. N Eng J Med 336(14):980–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, São Julião GP, Proscurshim I, Gama-Rodrigues J (2011) Nonoperative approaches to rectal cancer: a critical evaluation. Semin Radiat Oncol 21:234–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim TH, Jeong S-Y, Choi DH et al (2008) Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 15:729–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morino M, Allaix ME (2013) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: what indications in 2013? Gastroenterology report 1:75–84PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mengual-Ballester M, García-Marín JA, Pellicer-Franco E et al (2012) Protective ileostomy: complications and mortality associated with its closure. Rev Esp de Enferm Dig 104:350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I et al (2006) Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1319–1328, discussion 1328–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dedemadi G, Wexner SD (2012) Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: to operate or not to operate? Dig Dis 30(Suppl 2):109–117. doi: 10.1159/000342039 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, São Julião GP et al (2014) Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:822–828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lezoche E, Baldarelli M, Lezoche G, Paganini AM, Gesuita R, Guerrieri M (2012) Randomized clinical trial of endoluminal locoregional resection versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for T2 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 99:1211–1218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Albert MR, Atallah SB, DeBeche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 56:301–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bujko K, Richter P, Smith FM et al (2013) Preoperative radiotherapy and local excision of rectal cancer with immediate radical re-operation for poor responders: a prospective multicentre study. Radiother Oncol 106:198–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bannon JP, Marks GJ, Mohiuddin M, Rakinic J, Jian NZ, Nagle D (1995) Radical and local excisional methods of sphincter-sparing surgery after high-dose radiation for cancer of the distal 3 cm of the rectum. Ann Surg Oncol 2:221–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonnen M, Crane C, Vauthey J-N et al (2004) Long-term results using local excision after preoperative chemoradiation among selected T3 rectal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:1098–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Callender GG, Das P, Rodriguez-Bigas M (2010) Local excision after preoperative chemoradiation results in an equivalent outcome to total mesorectal excision in selected patients with T3 rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17:441–447PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caricato M, Borzomati D, Ausania F et al (2006) Complementary use of local excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Surg Endosc 20:1203–1207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Habr-Gama A, de Souza PM, Ribeiro U et al (1998) Low rectal cancer: impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1087–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huh JW, Jung EJ, Park YA, Lee KY, Sohn S, Ph D (2008) Preoperative chemoradiation followed by transanal excision for rectal cancer. J Surg Res 148(2):244–250Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kundel Y, Brenner R, Purim MDO, et al. (2010) Is local excision after complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer an acceptable treatment option? Dis Colon Rectum 53(12):1624–1631.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mohiuddin M, Marks G (1993) Patterns of recurrence following high-dose preoperative radiation and sphincter-preserving surgery for cancer of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 36:117–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Numata M, Shiozawa M, Watanabe T et al (2012) The clinicopathological features of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma and a therapeutic strategy for the disease. World J Surg Oncol 10:109PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guerrieri M, Baldarelli M, Organetti L et al (2008) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of selected patients with distal rectal cancer: 15 years experience. Surg Endosc 22:2030–2035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park C, Lee W, Han S, Yun S, Chun H-K (2007) Transanal local excision for preoperative concurrent chemoradiation therapy for distal rectal cancer in selected patients. Surg Today 37:1068–1072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith FM, Waldron D, Winter DC (2010) Rectum-conserving surgery in the era of chemoradiotherapy. Br J Surg 97:1752–1764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chang AJ, Nahas CS, Araujo SE et al (2008) Early rectal cancer: local excision or radical surgery? J Surg Educ 65(1):67–72Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Middleton PF, Sutherland LM, Maddern GJ (2005) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 48:270–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schell SR, Zlotecki RA, Mendenhall WM (2002) Transanal excision of locally advanced rectal cancers downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Am College Surg 194:584–590, discussion 590–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marks G, Mohiuddin MM, Masoni L, Pecchioli L (1990) High-dose preoperative radiation and full-thickness local excision. A new option for patients with select cancers of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 33:735–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Canda AE, Terzi C, Gorken IB, Oztop I, Sokmen S, Fuzun M (2010) Effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on anal sphincter functions and quality of life in rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:197–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Do L, Syed N, Puthawala A, Azawi S, Shbeeb I, Gong I-Y (2011) Low-lying rectal cancer with anal canal involvement: abdominoperineal or low anterior resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Gastrointest Cancer Res 4(3):90–95Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Koebrugge B, Bosscha K, Ernst MF (2009) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of rectal lesions: is there a learning curve? Dig Surg 26:372–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bignell MB, Ramwell A, Evans JR, Dastur N, Simson JNL (2010) Complications of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS): a prospective audit. Colorectal Dis 12(7 Online):e99-103Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gracia Solanas JA, Ramírez Rodríguez JM, Aguilella Diago V, Elía Guedea M, Martínez DM (2006) A prospective study about functional and anatomic consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 98:234–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jin Z, Yin L, Xue L, Lin M, Zheng Q (2010) Anorectal functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery in benign and early malignant tumors. World J Surg 34:1128–1132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Morino M, Allaix ME, Famiglietti F, Caldart M, Arezzo A (2013) Does peritoneal perforation affect short- and long-term outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery? Surg Endosc 27:181–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hughes R, Glynne-Jones R, Grainger J et al (2006) Can pathological complete response in the primary tumour following pre-operative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3-T4 rectal cancer predict for sterilisation of pelvic lymph nodes, a low risk of local recurrence and the appropriateness of local excision? Int J Colorectal Dis 21:11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pucciarelli S, De Paoli A, Guerrieri M et al (2013) Local excision after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: results of a multicenter phase II clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1349–1356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bruheim K, Guren MG, Skovlund E et al (2010) Late side effects and quality of life after radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:1005–1011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brændengen M, Tveit KM, Bruheim K, Cvancarova M, Berglund Å, Glimelius B (2011) Late patient-reported toxicity after preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer: results from a randomized phase III study. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 81:1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Park IJ, You YN, Skibber JM et al (2013) Comparative analysis of lymph node metastases in patients with ypT0-2 rectal cancers after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 56:135–141PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Richman P, Makris A, Harrison M et al (2006) Can pathological complete response in the primary tumour following pre-operative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3–T4 rectal cancer predict for sterilisation of pelvic lymph nodes, a low risk of local recurrence and the appropriateness of local excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(1):11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kim D-W, Kim DY, Kim TH et al (2006) Is T classification still correlated with lymph node status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer? Cancer 106:1694–1700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Read TE, Andujar JE, Caushaj PF et al (2004) Neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: histologic response of the primary tumor predicts nodal status. Dis Colon Rectum 47:825–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Heald RJ, Beets G, Carvalho C (2014) Report from a consensus meeting: response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer—predictor of cure and a crucial new choice for the patient: on behalf of the Champalimaud 2014 Faculty for “Rectal cancer: when NOT to operate”. Colorectal Dis 16:334–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irshad Shaikh
    • 1
  • Alan Askari
    • 1
  • Suzana Ourû
    • 1
  • Janindra Warusavitarne
    • 1
  • Thanos Athanasiou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Omar Faiz
    • 1
  1. 1.St Mark’s HospitalImperial College LondonEnglandUK
  2. 2.Hammersmith and St Mary’s HospitalImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations