Barriers to screening colonoscopy in an urban population: a study to help focus further efforts to attain full compliance
- 359 Downloads
Awareness of colorectal cancer and decision for colorectal cancer screening is influenced by multiple factors including ethnicity, level of education, and adherence to regular medical follow up.
Our survey aimed at assessing barriers to colorectal cancer screening among urban population.
This study is a survey of the general population.
This study was made at a local community in the downtown area of a metropolitan city.
The study population for this survey included 2000 non-institutionalized residents from local community of Brooklyn downtown area of City of Brooklyn, NY, USA. All participants were 50 years or older.
No intervention was done.
Main outcome measurement
The survey questionnaire collected information about demographic, socioeconomic level, awareness of various cancers and their screening methods, and awareness of screening colonoscopy.
Colonoscopy was identified as the best screening test by 31 % of the subjects. Pain and discomfort was the major reason for not having a colonoscopy. The fear of a complication declined significantly after the first colonoscopy but fear of pain and discomfort increased. Difficulty with bowel preparation before a colonoscopy was a significant problem; it discouraged significant number of participants from having another colonoscopy.
This study is limited by its small sample size.
Physician/family and peer influence seems important but influencing only a minority of subjects. Fear of complications should be allayed using accurate statistical information. Pain should be significantly diminished and/or eliminated during colonoscopy. Future research should focus to minimize complexity and discomfort associated with bowel preparation.
KeywordsScreening Colonoscopy Urban population Compliance
- Flex. Sig.
- Laxative Prep
Primary care physician
Monitored anesthesia care
Tumor node metastasis
- 1.American Cancer Society (2012) Colorectal cancer facts & figures. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bebee TJ et al (2007) Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity of computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc 82:666–671Google Scholar
- 11.Wolf MS, Baker DW, Makoul G (2007) Physican–patient communication about colorectal cancer screening. Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Communication and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. J Gen Intern Med 22(11):1493–1499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Etzioni D, Ponce N, Babey S et al (2004) A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001. Calif Health Interview Surv Cancer 101(11):2523–2623Google Scholar