Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery
One of the main uses of robotic assisted abdominal surgery is the mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of the present study is to analyse the learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer.
Patients and methods
We included in our study 43 consecutive rectal cancer resections (16 females and 27 males) performed from January 2008 through December 2010. Mean age of patients was 66 ± 9.0 years. Surgical procedures included both abdomino-perineal and anterior resections. We analysed the following parameters: demographic data of the patients included in the study, intra- and postoperative data, time taking to set up the robot for operations (set-up or docking time), operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rates and pathological specimen features. The learning curve was analysed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology.
The procedures understudied included seven abdomino-perineal resections and 36 anterior resections. In our series of patients, mean robotic set-up time was 62.9 ± 24.6 min, and the mean operative time was 197.4 ± 44.3 min. Once we applied CUSUM methodology, we obtained two graphs for CUSUM values (operating time and success), both of them showing three well-differentiated phases: phase 1 (the initial 9–11 cases), phase 2 (the middle 12 cases) and phase 3 (the remaining 20–22 cases). Phase 1 represents initial learning; phase 2 plateau represents increased competence in the use of the robotic system, and finally, phase 3 represents the period of highest skill or mastery with a reduction in docking time (p = 0.000), but a slight increase in operative time (p = 0.007).
The CUSUM curve shows three phases in the learning and use of robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery which correspond to the phases of initial learning of the technique, consolidation and higher expertise or mastery. The data obtained suggest that the estimated learning curve for robotic assisted rectal cancer surgery is achieved after 21–23 cases.
KeywordsRectal cancer Robotic assisted surgery Learning curve
- 1.Herold A, Lehur P, Matzel K, O’conell P (2008) Coloproctology (European Manual of Medicine), 1st edn. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K edGoogle Scholar
- 5.Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Jiménez Rodríguez RM, Díaz Pavón JM, De la Portilla De Juan F, Prendes Sillero E, Cadet Dussort JMH, Padillo J (2011) Prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparosocpic surgery in colorectal carcinoma resection. Cir Esp 89:432–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Akmal Y, Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J (2012) Robot-assisted total mesorrectal excisión: is there a learning curve? Surg Endosc. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2216-5
- 17.Bege T, Lelong B, Esterni B, Turrini O, Guiramand J, Francon D, Mokart D, Houvenaeghel G, Giovannini M, Delpero JR (2010) The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorrectal excision for rectal cancer. Lessons drawn from a single institution’s experience. Ann Surg 251:249–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120:413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Bell MC, Torgerson JL, Kreaden U (2009) The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon. S D Med 62(91):93–95Google Scholar