International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 1–7

Rationale for and clinical benefits of colonoscopy with narrow band imaging: pathological prediction and colorectal screening

Review

Abstract

Introduction

Narrow-band imaging (NBI), an emerging imaging technology, allows direct visualization of capillaries on the gastrointestinal mucosal surface. The combination of NBI and magnifying endoscopy can be used to identify morphological changes in these capillaries during the process of carcinogenesis.

Findings and conclusions

Thus far, pathological predictions based on capillary pattern classifications have been reported to have good diagnostic accuracy. However, most of these studies have been single-center trials based on each institutional classification, and worldwide multicenter trials aimed at their standardization are needed to validate the clinical benefits of the various NBI classification systems.

Keywords

Colonoscopy Narrow band imaging Pathological prediction Colorectal screening 

References

  1. 1.
    Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T et al (1994) Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol 47:880–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matsuda T, Fujii T, Saito Y et al (2008) Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol 103:2700–2706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kubo H, Fujiwara T, Jussila L et al (2000) Involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 in maintenance of integrity of endothelial cell lining during tumor angiogenesis. Blood 96:546–553PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Konerding MA, Fait E, Dimitropoulou C et al (1998) Impact of fibroblast growth factor-2 on tumor microvascular architecture. A tridimensional morphometric study. Am J Pathol 152:1607–1616PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Konerding MA, Fait E, Gaumann A (2001) 3D microvascular architecture of pre-cancerous lesions and invasive carcinomas of the colon. Br J Cancer 84:1354–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M et al (2004) Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. J Biomed Opt 9:568–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tajiri H, Niwa H (2008) Proposal for a consensus terminology in endoscopy: how should different endoscopic imaging techniques be grouped and defined? Endoscopy 40:775–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK (2010) A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:865–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paggi S, Rondonotti E, Amato A, et al. Resect and discard strategy in clinical practice: a prospective cohort study. Endoscopy. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309891.
  10. 10.
    Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S et al (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39:534–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Emura F et al (2010) Efficacy of capillary pattern type IIIA/IIIB by magnifying narrow band imaging for estimating depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. BMC Gastroenterol 10:33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sano Y, Ikematsu H, Fu KI et al (2009) Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 69:278–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanao H, Tanaka S, Oka S et al (2009) Narrow-band imaging magnification predicts the histology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 69:631–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wada Y, Kudo SE, Kashida H et al (2009) Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with the magnifying narrow-band imaging system. Gastrointest Endosc 70:522–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saito S, Tajiri H, Ohya T, et al. (2011) Imaging by magnifying endoscopy with NBI implicates the remnant capillary network as an indication for endoscopic resection in early colon cancer. Int J Surg Oncol (in press).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y (2012) Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology 143:599-607.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gross S, Trautwein C, Behrens A et al (2011) Computer-based classification of small colorectal polyps by using narrow-band imaging with optical magnification. Gastrointest Endosc 74:1354–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al (2002) Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1296–1308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1795–1803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pohl J, Schneider A, Vogell H et al (2011) Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial. Gut 60:485–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N et al (2011) Randomized, controlled trial of standard-definition white-light, high-definition white-light, and narrow-band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc 74:593–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T et al (2009) Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 136:410–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ikematsu H, Saito Y, Tanaka S, et al. (2012) The impact of narrow band imaging for colon polyp detection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial by tandem colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol (in press).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A et al (2012) Comparison of the yield and miss rate of narrow band imaging and white light endoscopy in patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 107:363–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chung SJ, Kim D, Song JH et al (2010) Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 72:136–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hong SN, Choe WH, Lee JH et al (2012) Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 75:1011–1021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS et al (2012) Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 61:402–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al (2006) Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355:2533–2541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EndoscopyJikei University School of MedicineMinato-kuJapan
  2. 2.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal MedicineJikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations