International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 1521–1529 | Cite as

Different approaches for complete mobilization of the splenic flexure during laparoscopic rectal cancer resection

  • Volker Benseler
  • Matthias Hornung
  • Igors Iesalnieks
  • Philipp von Breitenbuch
  • Gabriel Glockzin
  • Hans J. Schlitt
  • Ayman Agha
Original Article



Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer has already become the standard procedure in many hospitals. The splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is an important preparational step. Several methods are used for laparoscopic SFM; however, studies comparing different approaches are lacking. In the present study, three different approaches for SFM have been compared to each other.


Between January 1998 and December 2010, 415 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent laparoscopic rectal resection at one center. Of these, 303 patients received complete splenic flexure mobilization. The SFM was performed using either a medial (SFM-M; n = 41), lateral (SFM-L; n = 214), or anterior (SFM-A; n = 48) approach.


There was a significantly higher rate of intraoperative complications in the SFM-L group as compared to the SFM-M or the SFM-A group (p = 0.038). Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 5 (10.6 %) patients of the SFM-A group compared to 38 patients (17.7 %) in the SFM-L group (p = 0.002) and 5 (12.1 %) patients in the SFM-M group (p = 0.037). SFM-L was also associated with a higher frequency of overall postoperative morbidity which was mainly due to wound infection rates (p = 0.001).


The anterior approach for SFM in laparoscopic surgery seems to be associated with lower frequency of intra- and postoperative morbidity.


Laparoscopy Laparoscopic surgery Splenic flexure mobilization Rectal resection Rectal cancer 



Complete splenic flexure mobilization


Inferior mesenteric vein


Partial splenic flexure mobilization


Splenic flexure mobilization


Splenic flexure mobilization anterior approach


Splenic flexure mobilization lateral approach


Splenic flexure mobilization medial approach



Drs. Agha, Hornung, Iesalnieks, von Breitenbuch, Glockzin, Schlitt, and Benseler have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Wang JK, Holubar SD, Wolff BG, Follestad B, O'Byrne MM, Qin R (2011) Risk factors for splenic injury during colectomy: a matched case–control study. World J Surg 35:1123–1129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cassar K, Munro A (2002) Iatrogenic splenic injury. J R Coll Surg Edinb 47:731–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fazio VW, Zutshi M, Remzi FH, Parc Y, Ruppert R, Furst A, Celebrezze J Jr, Galanduik S, Orangio G, Hyman N, Bokey L, Tiret E, Kirchdorfer B, Medich D, Tietze M, Hull T, Hammel J (2007) A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg 246:481–488, discussion 488–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fürst A, Suttner S, Agha A, Beham A, Jauch KW (2003) Colonic J-pouch vs. coloplasty following resection of distal rectal cancer: early results of a prospective, randomized, pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1161–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho YH, Brown S, Heah SM, Tsang C, Seow-Choen F, Eu KW, Tang CL (2002) Comparison of J-pouch and coloplasty pouch for low rectal cancers: a randomized, controlled trial investigating functional results and comparative anastomotic leak rates. Ann Surg 236:49–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brennan DJ, Moynagh M, Brannigan AE, Gleeson F, Rowland M, O'Connell PR (2007) Routine mobilization of the splenic flexure is not necessary during anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 50:302–307, discussion 307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park JS, Kang SB, Kim DW, Lee KH, Kim YH (2009) Laparoscopic versus open resection without splenic flexure mobilization for the treatment of rectum and sigmoid cancer: a study from a single institution that selectively used splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:62–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim J, Choi DJ, Kim SH (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization: a prospective study assessing anastomotic safety. Hepatogastroenterology 56:1354–1358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wittekind C, Meyer H-J, Bootz F (eds) (2003) UICC: TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. Springer, Berlin, pp 66–70, 6. AuflageGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agha A, Fürst A, Hierl J, Iesalnieks I, Glockzin G, Anthuber M, Jauch KW, Schlitt HJ (2008) Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients. Surg Endosc 22:2229–2237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fürst A, Schwandner O, Heiligensetzer A, Iesalnieks I, Agha A (2010) Laparoscopic TME in rectal cancer—electronic supplementary: op-video. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:181–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, Meijer DW, Buunen M, Jeekel J, Anderberg B, Cuesta MA, Cuschierl A, Fingerhut A, Fleshman JW, Guillou PJ, Haglind E, Himpens J, Jacobi CA, Jakimowicz JJ, Koeckerling F, Lacy AM, Lezoche E, Monson JR, Morino M, Neugebauer E, Wexner SD, Whelan RL, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frame RJ, Wahed S, Mohiuddin MK, Katory M (2010) Right lateral position for laparoscopic splenic flexure mobilisation. Colorectal Dis 13:178–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agha A, Moser C, Iesalnieks I, Piso P, Schlitt HJ (2008) Combination of hand-assisted and laparoscopic proctocolectomy (HALP): technical aspects, learning curve and early postoperative results. Surg Endosc 22:1547–1552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tepper JE, O'Connell MJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Compton C, Benson AB 3rd, Cummings B, Gunderson L, Macdonald JS, Mayer RJ (2001) Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:157–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    den Dulk M, Collette L, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Daban A, Bosset JF (2007) Quality of surgery in T3-4 rectal cancer: involvement of circumferential resection margin not influenced by preoperative treatment. Results from EORTC trial 22921. Eur J Cancer 43:1821–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Benseler
    • 1
  • Matthias Hornung
    • 1
  • Igors Iesalnieks
    • 1
  • Philipp von Breitenbuch
    • 1
  • Gabriel Glockzin
    • 1
  • Hans J. Schlitt
    • 1
  • Ayman Agha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Center RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations