International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 959–965

Underutilisation of the gastroscope for total colonoscopy in adults: a survey of two European countries

  • Andriani Koumi
  • Evangelos Kalaitzakis
  • Alastair Forbes
  • Marios Z. Panos
Original Article

Abstract

Background and study aims

High caecal intubation success rates have been reported with the gastroscope in adults. We surveyed the current use of the gastroscope for total colonoscopy in adults in the UK and Greece.

Methods

A questionnaire was e-mailed to 952 members of the British Society of Gastroenterology (UK) and 478 members of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology (GR), enquiring as to access to a paediatric colonoscope, use of gastroscope for total colonoscopy and estimate of caecal intubation success rate.

Results

Valid replies were 17.4% from UK and 19.7% from GR. The paediatric colonoscope was available to 106/138 (77%) UK and to only 18/86 (21%) GR respondents (p = 0.0002). Of all the UK and GR respondents, 109/138 (79%) and 68/86 (79%), respectively, did not use the gastroscope for total colonoscopy. For the use of the gastroscope for total colonoscopy, 26/29 (89%) UK and 9/18 (50%) GR users did so, while a paediatric colonoscope was also available (p = 0.001), and 3/29 (10.3%) UK and 9/18 (50%) GR users did so, whilst they had no access to a paediatric colonoscope (p = 0.001). Estimated gastroscope caecal intubation success rate was 69% (SD 0.26) UK and 46% (SD 0.36) GR, p = 0.008. Only 37% UK and 28% GR respondents used the gastroscope to examine the left colon.

Conclusions

The gastroscope is underutilised for total colonoscopy in both the UK and Greece. Use of the gastroscope does not appear to be related to lack of access to a paediatric colonoscope in the UK but may be in GR. Gastroscope caecal intubation success rate justifies its use where the colonoscope fails.

Keywords

Gastroscope Colonoscopy Underutilization Caecum Intubation 

References

  1. 1.
    ASGE/ACG (2006) Taskforce on quality in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 63:S16–S28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris JK, Vader JP, Wietlisbach V et al (2007) Variations in colonoscopy practice in Europe: a multicentre descriptive study (EPAGE). Scand J Gastroenterol 42:126–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaminsky MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. NEJM 362:1795–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leung FW (2008) Methods of reducing discomfort during colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 53:1462–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Waye JD (2002) The best way to painless colonoscopy. Endoscopy 34:489–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Williams CB, Saunders BP (2002) Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic resonance imaging. Endoscopy 34:435–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tran DQ, Rosen L, Kim R et al (2001) Actual colonoscopy: what are the risks of perforation? Am Surg 67:845–847PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown GJE, Saunders BP (2005) Advances in colonic imaging: technical improvements in colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Williams CB (2000) A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomized controlled trial. Gut 46:801–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King PD, Madsen R, Marshall JB (2000) Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 51:314–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bat L, Williams CB (1989) Usefulness of pediatric colonoscopes in adult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 35:352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marshall JB (1996) Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 44:675–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marshall JB, Parez RA, Mads RW (2002) Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 55:838–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saunders BP, Fukumoto M, Halligan S et al (1996) Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women? Gastrointest Endosc 43:124–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shida T, Takano S, Kaiho M, Miyazaki M (2008) Transparent hood attached to a gastroscope: a simple rescue technique for patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopy 40:E139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paonessa NJ, Rosen L, Stasik JJ (2005) Using the gastroscope for incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:851–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kozarek RA, Botoman VA, Patterson DJ (1989) Prospective evaluation of a small caliber upper endoscope for colonoscopy after unsuccessful standard examination. Gastrointest Endosc 35:333–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park CH, Lee WS, Joo YE et al (2006) Sedation-free colonoscopy using an upper endoscope is tolerable and effective in patients with low body mass index: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2504–2510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wehrmann T, Lechowicz I, Martchenko K, Riphaus A (2007) Routine colonoscopy with a standard gastroscope: a randomized comparative trial in a western population. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:443–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paranandi B, Anglim N, Sawyer A, Carty E, Seward E (2009) Caecal intubation with a gastroscope following an incomplete colonoscopy. Gut (Abstract) 58(Suppl 1):A53Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morini S, Zullo A, Hassan C et al (2011) Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both? Int J Colorectal Dis 26:103–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kalaitzakis E, Panos M, Sadik R et al (2009) Clinicians' attitudes towards endoscopic ultrasound: a survey of four European countries. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:100–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C et al (2004) A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53:277–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andriani Koumi
    • 1
    • 3
  • Evangelos Kalaitzakis
    • 2
    • 4
  • Alastair Forbes
    • 2
  • Marios Z. Panos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyEuroclinic of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity College HospitalLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of GastroenterologyNIMTS HospitalAthensGreece
  4. 4.Institute of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations