International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 453–458 | Cite as

Transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation for management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in children with myelomeningocele

  • Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
  • Lida Sharifi-Rad
  • Farideh Nejat
  • Majid Kajbafzadeh
  • Hamid-Reza Talaei
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

We describe the efficacy of transcutaneous interferential (IF) electrical stimulation on constipation symptoms in children with myelomeningocele (MMC).

Methods

MMC children (30, comprising of 17 girls and 13 boys), mean age 6.7 ± 2.9, with moderate to severe intractable constipation were enrolled in this study. They were divided into treatment (IF stimulation, 15 children) and control (sham stimulation, 15 children) groups. All children underwent anorectal manometry before and 6 months after IF therapy considering the rectoanal inhibitory reflex and sphincter pressure. Parents were instructed to complete a bowel habit diary by providing data on the number of defecations per week, form of stool and episodes of pain during defecation. According to parents’ report a total neurogenic bowel dysfunction score questionnaire was filled before and 6 months after treatment. A 15-course abdominal area IF electrical stimulation was performed for 20 min and three times per week, with low-frequency current in a duration of 250 μs every 6 s. Children were followed up for a minimum period of 6 months.

Results

In the treatment group, sphincter pressure and rectoanal inhibitory reflex significantly improved compared with sham stimulation and pretreatment measures (P < .05). In 73% of patients, the characteristics of constipation decreased immediately after IF therapy, while in 53% patients, they persisted for 6 months. Frequency of defecation increased statistically significant from 2.5 ± 1.1 per week before treatment to 4.7 ± 2.3 per week after treatment (P < .001).

Conclusions

This pilot study showed that IF therapy is safe, noninvasive, and effective modality to improve constipation symptoms and anorectal manometry parameters in children with history of myelomeningocele.

Keywords

Myelomeningocele Neurogenic bowel dysfunction Interferential electrical stimulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Mattsson S, Gladh G (2006) Tap water enema for children with myelomeningocele and neurogenic bowel dysfunction. Acta Paediatr 95:369–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krogh K, Christensen P, Laurberg S (2001) Colorectal symptoms in patients with neurological diseases. Acta Neurol Scand 103:335–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanchez MR, Barrientos FG, Arrojo VF, Vazquez EJJ (1999) The anal plug in the treatment of fecal incontinence in myelomeningocele patients; results of the first clinical trial. An Esp Pediatr 51:489–492Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shandling B, Gilmour RF (1987) The enema continence catheter in spina bifida: successful bowel management. J Pediatr Surg 22:271–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Malone PS, Ransly PG, Kiely EM (1990) Preliminary report: the ante grade continence enema. Lancet 336:1217–1218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wald N (1983) Use of biofeedback in treatment of fecal incontinence in patients with myelomeningocele. Pediatrics 68:45–49Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palmer LS, Richards I, Kaplan E (1997) Transrectal electrostimulation therapy for neuropathic bowel dysfunction in children with myelomeningocele. J Urol 157:1449–1452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chase JW, Robertson VJ, Southwell B, Huston J, Gibb S (2005) Pilot study using transcutaneous electrical stimulation (interferential current) to treat chronic treatment-resistant constipation and soiling in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakamura M, Sakurai T, Tsujimoto Y (1986) Bladder inhibition by electrical stimulation of the perianal skin. Urol Int 41:62–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ozcan J, Ward AR, Robertson VJ (2004) A comparison of true and premodulated interferential currents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:409–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Turkan A, Inci Y, Fazli D (2005) The short-term effects of physical therapy in different intensities of urodynamic stress incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 59:43–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lewis SJ, Heaton KW (1997) Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 32:920–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benninga M, Candy DC, Catto-Smith AG, Clayden G, Loening-Baucke V, Di Lorenzo C, Nurko S, Staiano A, Clayden G, Loening-Baucke V, Lorenzo CD (2005) The Paris consensus on childhood constipation terminology (PACCT) group. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 40(3):273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krogh K, Christensen P, Sabroe S, Laurberg S (2006) Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score. Spinal Cord 44:625–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krogh K, Lie HR, Bilenberg N, Laurberg S (2003) Bowel function in Danish children with myelomeningocele. APMIS 109:S81Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kajbafzadeh AM, Sina AR, Moradi A, Payabvash S, Baharnoori M, Vejdani K (2007) Laparoscopic ante grade continent enema through VQ stoma skin flaps using two ports: long-term follow up. J Endourol 21(1):78–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaccaro CA, Cheong DM, Wexner SD, Salanga VD, Phillips RC, Hanson MR (1994) Role of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment in constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1250–1254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Loening-Baucke V, Yamada T (1995) Is the afferent pathway from the rectum impaired in children with chronic constipation and encopresis? Gastroenterology 109:397–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yuan Z, Cheng W, Hou A, Wang W, Zhang S, Liu D, Gao F, Li H, Wang W (2008) Constipation is associated with spina bifida occulta in children. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:1348–1353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dinning PG, Fuentealba SE, Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, Cook IJ (2007) Sacral nerve stimulation induces pan-colonic propagating pressure waves and increases defecation frequency in patients with slowtransit constipation. Colorectal Dis 9(2):123–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koklu S, Koklu G, Ozguçlu E, Kayani GU, Akbal E, Hasçelik Z (2010) Clinical trial: interferential electric stimulation in functional dyspepsia patients — a prospective randomized study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 31(9):961–968PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh
    • 1
  • Lida Sharifi-Rad
    • 2
  • Farideh Nejat
    • 3
  • Majid Kajbafzadeh
    • 1
  • Hamid-Reza Talaei
    • 4
  1. 1.Pediatric Urology Research Center, Department of Pediatric Urology, Children’s Hospital Medical CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Physical Therapy, Children’s Hospital Medical CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Neurosurgery, Children’s Hospital Medical CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.Department of GastroenterologyFayyazbakhsh HospitalTehranIran

Personalised recommendations