Heterogeneous distribution of K-ras mutations in primary colon carcinomas: implications for EGFR-directed therapy
- 266 Downloads
K-ras mutations predict resistance against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was to analyze the distribution of K-ras mutations in primary tumors and corresponding sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from colon cancer patients.
Tumor biopsies and SLNs from 158 patients with non-metastatic colon cancer were analyzed for K-ras mutations in codons 12 and 13 by a sensitive and quantitative peptide nucleic acid clamp PCR assay.
Analyses of single fresh-frozen tumor biopsies revealed K-ras mutations in 67 (42%) of the patients. Apparently low levels of K-ras mutations in 13 of the mutated primary tumors and the presence of K-ras mutations in SLNs from seven patients with a wild-type primary tumor biopsy suggested possible intratumoral heterogeneity for 20 of the patients. To confirm this hypothesis, we analyzed tissue sections from all available formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor blocks from these 20 patients. Ten of the patients had a mixture of tissue sections positive and tissue sections negative for K-ras mutations, two patients had K-ras mutations in all sections, and eight patients had no detectable K-ras mutations in tumor FFPE tissue blocks. Among these eight patients, five had K-ras mutations detected in SLNs. Thus, evidence supporting a heterogeneous distribution of K-ras mutations was obtained for 15 patients.
Heterogeneous distribution of K-ras codon 12 and 13 mutations within primary tumor, or between primary tumor and lymph node metastases, was demonstrated for 15 (20%) of 74 colon cancer patients having K-ras mutations. This may have implications for tissue sampling routines with regard to EGFR-directed therapy of CRC, both in adjuvant and metastatic settings.
KeywordsColon cancer EGFR K-ras mutations Heterogeneity
We thank Anne Elin Varhaugvik for technical assistance. The study was supported by the Western Norway Regional Health Authorities, the Norwegian Cancer Society, the Folke Hermansen Fund, and Stavanger University Hospital.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, Hamilton SR, Hammond EH, Hayes DF, McAllister PK, Morton RF, Schilsky RL (2009) American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol 27:2091–2096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1757–1765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Santini D, Loupakis F, Vincenzi B, Floriani I, Stasi I, Canestrari E, Rulli E, Maltese PE, Andreoni F, Masi G, Graziano F, Baldi GG, Salvatore L, Russo A, Perrone G, Tommasino MR, Magnani M, Falcone A, Tonini G, Ruzzo A (2008) High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice. Oncologist 13:1270–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Italiano A, Hostein I, Soubeyran I, Fabas T, Benchimol D, Evrard S, Gugenheim J, Becouarn Y, Brunet R, Fonck M, Francois E, Saint-Paul MC, Pedeutour F (2010) KRAS and BRAF mutational status in primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: biological and clinical implications. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1429–1434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Weinberg RA (2006) The biology of cancer. Garland science. Taylor and Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 35.Maheswaran S, Sequist LV, Nagrath S, Ulkus L, Brannigan B, Collura CV, Inserra E, Diederichs S, Iafrate AJ, Bell DW, Digumarthy S, Muzikansky A, Irimia D, Settleman J, Tompkins RG, Lynch TJ, Toner M, Haber DA (2008) Detection of mutations in EGFR in circulating lung-cancer cells. N Engl J Med 359:366–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar