Dynamic MRI defecography vs. entero-colpo-cysto-defecography in the evaluation of midline pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders
- 417 Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of dynamic MR defecography (MR-D) with entero-colpo-cysto-defecography (ECCD) in the assessment of midline pelvic floor hernias (MPH) in female pelvic floor disorders.
From August 2004 to August 2010, 3,006 female patients who required ECCD for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders were enrolled in this study. All the 1,160 patients with ECCD findings of MPH were asked to undergo MR-D; 1,142 accepted to undergo MR-D and constituted the object of analysis. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee. All the patients gave their written informed consent to take part in the study.
Overall, the prevalence of MPH at ECCD was higher if compared with that at MR-D. Concerning the hernia content, there were significantly more enteroceles and sigmoidoceles on ECCD than on MR-D, whereas, in relation to the hernia development modalities, the prevalence of elytroceles, edroceles, and Douglas' hernias at ECCD was significantly higher than that at MR-D. In spite of a 100% specificity, the sensibility of MR-D in the detection of an omentocele, sigmoidocele, and enterocele was, respectively, 95%, 82%, and 65%, showing an inferior diagnostic capacity if compared with that of ECCD.
MR-D shows lower sensitivity than ECCD in the detection of MPH development. The less-invasive MR-D may have a role in a better evaluation of the entire pelvic anatomy and pelvic organ interaction especially in patients with multicompartmental defects, planned for surgery.
KeywordsPelvic floor disorders Entero-colpo-cysto-defecography Dynamic MR defecography Midline pelvic floor hernias
- 8.Blandino A, Rotondo A, Danza F, Menchi I, Pozzi Mucelli R (2010) Imaging delle disfunzioni del pavimento pelvico in: Imaging dell'Apparato Urogenitale Patologia non oncologica, 1st edn. Springer.Google Scholar
- 19.Cl B, Tumbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE (1988) Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecation disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 3:72–80Google Scholar
- 24.Dodi G (1994) “Colonproctologia ambulatoriale:trattatto per chirurghi, gastroenterologi e madici pratici” PiccinGoogle Scholar
- 25.Guglielmi G, Schiavon F, Cammarota T (2006) Radiologia geriatrica. Springer, ItaliaGoogle Scholar
- 26.Cordiano C, D'Amico DF (1981) Manuale di Chirurgia d'urgenza. PiccinGoogle Scholar
- 28.Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2001) Pelvic floor. Imaging radiol 218:621–641Google Scholar
- 34.Beer-Gabel M, Assoulin Y, Amitai M, Bardan E (2008) A comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound (DTP-US) with dynamic evacuation proctography (DEP) in the diagnosis of cul de sac hernia (enterocele) in patients with evacuatory dysfunction. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:513–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Hale D (2008) Clinical and surgical pelvic organ prolapse. In: Bartram CI, DeLancey JOL (eds) Medical radiology. Diagnostic and radiation oncology: pelvic floor disorders, 2nd edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar