Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 26, Issue 7, pp 941–947 | Cite as

Effect of proctoring on implementation and results of elective laparoscopic colon surgery

  • Robbert BoskerEmail author
  • Henk Groen
  • Christiaan Hoff
  • Eric Totte
  • Rutger Ploeg
  • Jean Pierre Pierie
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

A steep learning curve exists for surgeons to become skilled in laparoscopic colon resection. Our institute offers a proctored training programme. The purpose of this descriptive study was to evaluate whether the course resulted in adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery into clinical practice, explore post-course practice patterns and analyse the outcome of surgical performance.

Methods

Between 2003 and 2008, 26 surgeons were trained by our institute. The course consisted of 24 elective laparoscopic resections under direct supervision. A questionnaire and a prospective post-course web-based registration were used to analyse the effect of the training and the outcome of surgical performance.

Results

The response rate of the questionnaire was 85%. The majority had not performed any laparoscopic colon resections before attending the course. All 24 respondents successfully implemented laparoscopy into daily practice. After the course, 70% of all sigmoid resections were performed laparoscopically in contrast with 0% of all transverse colon resections. The results of the trainees after following the course are equal to results of other studies.

Conclusions

A proctored training programme, consisting of 24 supervised cases, is safe and feasible. For adequate monitoring, participating in a post-course registry should be obligatory.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Colon Training Proctoring 

Supplementary material

References

  1. 1.
    Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abraham NS, Young JM, Soloman MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW (2004) Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 18:898–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dowson HM, Bong JJ, Lovell DP, Worthington TR, Karanjia ND, Rockall TA (2008) Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 95:909–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laurent C, Leblanc F, Bretagnol F, Capdepont M, Rullier E (2008) Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:903–908PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Clinical Outcome of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short-term qualitiy of life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs. open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287(3):321–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cohrande systematic review of randomised trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bosker RJI, Hoogenboom FJ, Groen H, Hoff C, Ploeg RJ, Pierie JPEN (2010) Laparoscopic recto-sigmoid resection for diverticular disease is suitable as a training operation. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:471–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wal G (2007) Risico's minimaal invasieve chirurgie onderschat. [The Netherlands Health Care Inspectorate website]. November 2007. Available at: http://www.igz.nl/15451/475693/2007-11_Rapport_Minimaal_in1.pdf
  13. 13.
    Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartus CM, Lipof T, Sawar CM, Vignati PV, Johnson KH, Sardella WV, Cohen JL (2005) Colovesical fistula: not a contraindication to elective laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48(2):233–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASSICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicenter, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1717–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shah PR, Joseph A, Haray PN (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications. Postgrad Med J 81(958):537–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fleshman J, Marcello P, Stamos MJ, Wexner SD (2006) Focus Group on Laparoscopic Colectomy Education as endorsed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Guidelines for laparoscopic colectomy course. Surg Endosc 20:1162–1167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robbert Bosker
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Henk Groen
    • 2
  • Christiaan Hoff
    • 3
    • 4
  • Eric Totte
    • 3
    • 4
  • Rutger Ploeg
    • 5
  • Jean Pierre Pierie
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryDeventer HospitalDeventerThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity Medical CenterGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryMedical Center LeeuwardenLeeuwardenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Leeuwarden Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery (LIMIS)LeeuwardenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations