Impact of defunctioning loop ileostomy on outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

  • Rudolf Mennigen
  • Norbert Senninger
  • Matthias Bruwer
  • Emile Rijcken
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

This study analyzes the impact of a temporary loop ileostomy on postoperative outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in terms of complications and reoperations including ileostomy closure.

Methods

The records of 122 consecutive patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis during a 12-year period were reviewed. In 89 patients, a defunctioning ileostomy was created, while 33 patients had no ileostomy. Statistics were done with Chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

Both study groups were comparable concerning age, colitis activity, previous diseases, previous surgery, use of steroids, and immunosuppressives. Pouch-related septic complications (anastomotic dehiscence, pouch leakage, pelvic abscess) were significantly lower in the ileostomy group (5.6% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.031), resulting in a lower rate of emergency laparotomies following restorative proctocolectomy (4.5% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.001). Including all complications associated with scheduled closure of ileostomy, the cumulative frequency of emergency laparotomies was significantly lower in the ileostomy group (13.5% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.032). The cumulative duration of hospitalization, including all hospital stays for complications or closure of the ileostomy, was significantly longer in the ileostomy group [median 22 days (11–92) vs. 14 days (9–109), p < 0.001]. During long-term follow-up, a stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis was more common in the ileostomy group (24.7% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.021), whereas only one stricture necessitated surgical therapy.

Conclusions

Creation of a defunctioning loop ileostomy reduces pouch-related septic complications and the frequency of emergency second laparotomies after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Keywords

Ileostomy Restorative proctocolectomy Complications Ulcerative colitis 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Parks AG, Nicholls RJ (1978) Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 2:85–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weston-Petrides GK, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Nicholls RJ, Mortensen NJ, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP (2008) Comparison of outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Arch Surg 143:406–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tulchinsky H, Hawley PR, Nicholls J (2003) Long-term failure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 238:229–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farouk R, Dozois RR, Pemberton JH, Larson D (1998) Incidence and subsequent impact of pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1239–1243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacRae HM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z, O’Connor BI, Ton EN (1997) Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. Dis Colon Rectum 40:257–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heuschen UA, Allemeyer EH, Hinz U, Lucas M, Herfarth C, Heuschen G (2002) Outcome after septic complications in J pouch procedures. Br J Surg 89:194–200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Montbrun SL, Johnson PM (2009) Proximal diversion at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: current practices of North American colorectal surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1178–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grobler SP, Hosie KB, Keighley MR (1992) Randomized trial of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 79:903–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Lucas M, Heuschen G, Herfarth C (2001) One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg 234:788–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ikeuchi H, Nakano H, Uchino M, Nakamura M, Noda M, Yanagi H, Yamamura T (2005) Safety of one-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1550–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davies M, Hawley PR (2007) Ten years experience of one-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1255–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hainsworth PJ, Bartolo DC (1998) Selective omission of loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:119–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lovegrove RE, Symeonides P, Tekkis PP, Goodfellow PB, Shorthouse AJ (2008) A selective approach to restorative proctocolectomy without ileostomy: a single centre experience. Colorectal Dis 10:916–924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walmsley RS, Ayres RC, Pounder RE, Allan RN (1998) A simple clinical colitis activity index. Gut 43:29–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matikainen M, Santavirta J, Hiltunen KM (1990) Ileoanal anastomosis without covering ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 33:384–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stephen W, Stern HS, O’Connor B, Reznick R (1992) Continuing evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure. Ann Surg 216:506–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Milsom JW, Lavery IC, Oakley JR, Fabre JM (1993) Omission of temporary diversion in restorative proctocolectomy—is it safe? Dis Colon Rectum 36:1007–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D (1997) One-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: a note of caution. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1019–1022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dolgin SE, Shlasko E, Gorfine S, Bekov K, Leleiko N (1999) Restorative proctocolectomy in children with ulcerative colitis utilizing rectal mucosectomy with or without diverting ileostomy. J Pediatr Surg 34:837–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kienle P, Weitz J, Benner A, Herfarth C, Schmidt J (2003) Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy. Surg Endosc 17:716–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Gorgun E, Ooi BS, Hammel J, Preen M, Church JM, Madbouly K, Lavery IC (2006) The outcome after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:470–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aberg H, Pahlman L, Karlbom U (2007) Small-bowel obstruction after restorative proctocolectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:637–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, Autschbach F, Stern J, Lucas M, Herfarth C, Heuschen G (2002) Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg 235:207–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kiran RP, da Luz MA, Remzi FH, FH CJM, Lavery I, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2010) Factors associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg 251:442–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Pemberton JH (1998) J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg 85:800–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, Fazio VW (2005) Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 48:243–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mor IJ, Vogel JD, da Luz MA, Shen B, Hammel J, Remzi FH (2008) Infliximab in ulcerative colitis is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1202–1207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Swenson BR, Hollenbeak CS, Poritz LS, Koltun WA (2005) Modified two-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: equivalent outcomes with less resource utilization. Dis Colon Rectum 48:256–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rudolf Mennigen
    • 1
  • Norbert Senninger
    • 1
  • Matthias Bruwer
    • 1
  • Emile Rijcken
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General and Visceral SurgeryUniversity Hospital MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations