International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 397–404 | Cite as

Evidence-based German guidelines for surgery for obesity

  • Norbert Runkel
  • Mario Colombo-Benkmann
  • Thomas P. Hüttl
  • Harald Tigges
  • Oliver Mann
  • Ricarda Flade-Kuthe
  • Edvard Shang
  • Martin Susewind
  • Stefani Wolff
  • Ricarda Wunder
  • Alfred Wirth
  • Klaus Winckler
  • Arved Weimann
  • Martina de Zwaan
  • Stefan Sauerland
Review

Abstract

Background

The young field of obesity surgery (bariatric surgery) in Germany expands as a consequence of the rapid increase of overweight and obesity. New surgical methods, minimal access techniques, and the enormous increase of scientific studies and evidence, all contribute to the success of bariatric surgery, which is the only realistic chance of permanent weight loss and regression of secondary diseases in many cases.

Methods

A systematic literature review, classification of evidence, graded recommendations, and interdisciplinary consensus.

Results

Obesity surgery is an integral component of the multimodal treatment of obesity, which consists of multidisciplinary evaluation and preparation, conservative and surgical treatment elements, and a life-long follow-up. The guideline confirms the body mass index (BMI)-based spectrum of indications (BMI > 40 kg/m2 or >35 kg/m2 with secondary diseases) and extends it through elimination of all age restrictions (>18 years and <60 years) and most of the contraindications. Precondition for surgery is the failure of a structured conservative program of 6–12 months or the expected futility of it. Type II diabetes mellitus becomes an independent indication criterion for BMI < 35 kg/m2 (metabolic surgery). The standard techniques are gastric balloon, gastric banding, gastric bypass, gastric sleeve, and biliopancreatic diversion. The choice of procedure is based on profound knowledge of results, long-term effects, complications, and patient-specific circumstances. The after-care should be structured and organized long term.

Conclusion

The S3-guidelines contain evidence-based recommendations for the indication, selection of procedure, technique, and follow-up. Patient care should improve after implementation of these guidelines in clinical practice. Compliance by decision makers and health insurers is warranted.

Keywords

Obesity Obesity surgery Bariatric surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Fontaine KR, Redden DT, Wang C et al (2003) Years of life lost due to obesity. JAMA 289:187–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292:1724–1737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K et al (2007) Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 142:621–632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K et al (2009) Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 122:248–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sjöström L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M et al (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 351:2683–2693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD et al (2007) Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 357:741–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC et al (2007) Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 357:753–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sauerland S, Angrisani L, Belachew M et al (2005) Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 19:200–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melissas J, Christodoulakis M, Schoretsanitis G et al (2001) Obesity-associated disorders before and after weight reduction by vertical banded gastroplasty in morbidly vs superobese individuals. Obes Surg 11:475–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Catheline JM, Bihan H, Le Quang T et al (2008) Preoperative cardiac and pulmonary assessment in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 18:271–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hallowell PT, Stellato TA, Schuster M et al (2007) Potentially life threatening sleep apnea is unrecognized without aggressive evaluation. Am J Surg 193:364–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heo M, Pietrobelli A, Fontaine KR, Sirey JA, Faith MS (2006) Depressive mood and obesity in US adults: comparison and moderation by sex, age, and race. Int J Obes 30:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simon GE, Von Korff M, Saunders K et al (2006) Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63:824–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Zwaan M, Wolf AM, Herpertz S (2007) Psychosomatische Aspekte der Adipositaschirurgie. Dtsch Ärztebl 104:2577–2583Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ashton D, Favretti F, Segato G (2008) Preoperative psychological testing—another form of prejustice. Obes Surg 18:1330–1337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim TH, Daud A, Ude AO et al (2006) Early U.S. outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 20:202–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marcus MD, Kalarchian MA, Courcoulas AP (2009) Psychiatric evaluation and follow-up of bariatric surgery patients. Am J Psychiatry 166:285–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Colles SL, Dixon JB, Marks P et al (2006) Preoperative weight loss with a very-low-energy diet: quantitation of changes in liver and abdominal fat by serial imaging. Am J Clin Nutr 84:304–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alami RS, Morton JM, Schuster R, Lie J et al (2007) Is there a benefit to preoperative weight loss in gastric bypass patients? A prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3:141–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dixon JB, O'Brien PE, Playfair J et al (2008) Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 299:316–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rubino F, Gagner M (2002) Potential of surgery for curing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg 236:554–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Laurie C et al (2006) Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 144:625–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shi X, Karmali S, Sharma AM, Birch DW (2010) A review of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 20:1171–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadiere GB (2006) A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg 16:1450–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bohdjalian A, Langer FB, Shakeri-Leidenmühler S et al (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy as sole and definitive bariatric procedure: 5-year results for weight loss and ghrelin. Obes Surg 20:535–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G (2010) Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg 252:319–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gould JC, Beverstein G, Reinhardt S, Garren MJ (2007) Impact of routine and long-term follow-up on weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3:627–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harper J, Madan AK, Ternovits CA, Tichansky DS (2007) What happens to patients who do not follow-up after bariatric surgery? Am Surg 73:181–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Orth WS, Madan AK, Taddeucci RJ et al (2008) Support group meeting attendance is associated with better weight loss. Obes Surg 18:391–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Song Z, Reinhardt K, Buzdon M, Liao P (2008) Association between support group attendance and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:100–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norbert Runkel
    • 1
  • Mario Colombo-Benkmann
    • 2
  • Thomas P. Hüttl
    • 3
  • Harald Tigges
    • 4
  • Oliver Mann
    • 5
  • Ricarda Flade-Kuthe
    • 6
  • Edvard Shang
    • 7
  • Martin Susewind
    • 8
  • Stefani Wolff
    • 9
  • Ricarda Wunder
    • 6
  • Alfred Wirth
    • 10
  • Klaus Winckler
    • 11
  • Arved Weimann
    • 12
  • Martina de Zwaan
    • 13
  • Stefan Sauerland
    • 14
  1. 1.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)Villingen-SchwenningenGermany
  2. 2.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)MünsterGermany
  3. 3.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)MünchenGermany
  4. 4.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein-und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)KonstanzGermany
  5. 5.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)HamburgGermany
  6. 6.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)HannoverGermany
  7. 7.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)MannheimGermany
  8. 8.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)BerlinGermany
  9. 9.Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie (DGAV)MagdeburgGermany
  10. 10.Deutsche Adipositasgesellschaft (DAG)Bad RothenfeldeGermany
  11. 11.Deutsche Adipositasgesellschaft (DAG)FrankfurtGermany
  12. 12.Deutsche Gesellschaft für ErnährungsmedizinLeipzigGermany
  13. 13.Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychosomatische Medizin und Ärztlichen PsychotherapieErlangenGermany
  14. 14.MethodologyKölnGermany

Personalised recommendations