Generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis: Hartmann’s procedure or primary anastomosis?
Hartmann’s procedure (HP) still remains the most frequently performed procedure for diffuse peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and safety of resection with primary anastomosis (RPA) in patients with purulent or fecal diverticular peritonitis and review morbidity and mortality after single stage procedure and Hartmann in our experience.
From January 1995 through December 2008, patients operated for generalized diverticular peritonitis were studied. Patients were classified into two main groups: RPA and HP.
A total of 87 patients underwent emergency surgery for diverticulitis complicated with purulent or diffuse fecal peritonitis. Sixty (69%) had undergone HP while RPA was performed in 27 patients (31%). At the multivariate analysis, RPA was associated with less post-operative complications (P < 0.05). Three out of the 27 patients with RPA (11.1%) developed a clinical anastomotic leakage and needed re-operation.
RPA can be safely performed without adding morbidity and mortality in cases of diffuse diverticular peritonitis. HP should be reserved only for hemodynamically unstable or high-risk patients. Specialization in colorectal surgery improves mortality and raises the percentage of one-stage procedures.
KeywordsDiffuse diverticular peritonitis Hartmann’s procedure Primary anastomosis Diverting ileostomy
The authors are grateful to Mr. Bernat Miguel, data manager of the Colorectal Unit of Bellvitge University Hospital and IDIBELL for managing the data of the present study.
- 1.Wong WD, Wexner SD, Lowry A, Vernava A 3rd, Burnstein M, Denstman F, Fazio V, Kerner B, Moore R, Oliver G, Peters W, Ross T, Senatore P, Simmang C (2000) Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Supporting documentation. The standards task force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 43(3):290–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Purkayastha S, Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Aydin N, Darzi A, Senapati A (2006) Primary resection with anastomosis vs. Hartmann’s procedure in nonelective surgery for acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 49(7):966–981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Dumont F, Vibert E, Duval H, Manaouil D, Sredic A, Alfahel N, Mauvais F, De Fresnoy H, Rudant J, Katsahian S, Riboulot M, Galy C, Verhaeghe P, Dupont H, Regimbeau JM (2005) Morbi-mortality after Hartmann procedure for peritonitis complicating sigmoid diverticulitis. A retrospective analysis of 85 cases. Ann Chir 130(6–7):391–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Vermeulen J, Coene PP, Van Hout NM, van der Harst E, Gosselink MP, Mannaerts GH, Weidema WF, Lange JF (2009) Restoration of bowel continuity after surgery for acute perforated diverticulitis: should Hartmann’s procedure be considered a one-stage procedure? Colorectal Dis 11(6):619–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Regenet N, Pessaux P, Hennekinne S, Lermite E, Tuech JJ, Brehant O, Arnaud JP (2003) Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann’s procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 18(6):503–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Fraccalvieri D, Biondo S, Saez J, Millan M, Kreisler E, Golda T, Frago R, Miguel B (2010) Management of colorectal anastomotic leakage: differences between salvage and anastomotic takedown. Am j Surg doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.0220.