International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 463–470 | Cite as

Use of severity classification systems in the surgical decision-making process in emergency laparotomy for perforated diverticulitis

  • Itai Pasternak
  • Michael Dietrich
  • Richard Woodman
  • Urs Metzger
  • David A. Wattchow
  • Urs Zingg
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Hartman’s procedure (HP) or primary anastomosis (PA) are the two surgical techniques used in patients undergoing emergency colectomy for perforated diverticulitis. There are no objective criteria to guide the surgeon’s choice of procedure. This study assesses whether classification and scoring systems can be used in the decision-making process.

Methods

One hundred eleven patients undergoing emergency laparotomy for perforated diverticulitis were analyzed. Logistic regression and interaction models were used to determine the predictive value in the two settings.

Results

Sixty five patients underwent HP and 46 patients underwent PA. Patients with HP had significantly higher scores, median age, and were more often on immunosuppressive medication. Mortality and surgical morbidity did not differ between the groups. The clinical anastomotic leak rate was 28.3% in the PA group. In the univariate logistic regression for in-hospital death, all scores showed a significant influence. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score had a significant influence on mortality. Each score was analyzed for its predictive value regarding mortality and morbidity with respect to type of operative procedure. Only CCI revealed a trend towards statistical significance. The risk of death increases with increasing CCI when PA is performed compared to HP.

Conclusion

None of the tested scores can be used to help the surgeon decide whether a PA or HP is appropriate in a specific patient. Comorbidity, represented as CCI in this study, might be more important than the locoregional situation.

Keywords

Perforated diverticulitis Severity scoring Decision-making process Hartmann’s procedure Primary anastomosis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Robert Whitfield, MBBS, for assistance in preparing the manuscript in English. No financial support is disclosed by the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Stollmann N, Raskin JB (2004) Diverticular disease of the colon. Lancet 363:631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salem L, Flum D (2004) Primary Anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure for patients with diverticular peritonitis? A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1953–1964CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rafferty J, Shellito P, Hyman NH, Buie WD (2006) Surgeons practice parameters for Sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:939–944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Regenet N, Pessaux P, Hennekinne S et al (2003) Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann's procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:503–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gooszen A, Tollenaar R, Geelkerken R et al (2001) Prospective study of primary anastomosis following sigmoid resection for suspected acute complicated diverticulitar disease. Br J Surg 88:693–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breitenstein S, Kraus S, Hahnloser D, Decurtins M, Clavien P, Demartines N (2007) Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation. Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure? A case-matched control study. World J Surg 31:2117–2124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abbas S (2007) Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:351–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T et al (2006) Primary resection with anastomosis vs. Hartmann's procedure in nonelective surgery for acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 49:966–981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biondo S, Ramos E, Fraccalvieri D, Kreisler E, Ragué JM, Jaurrieta E (2006) Comparative study of left colonic peritonitis severity score and Mannheim peritonitis index. Br J Surg 93:616–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horiuchi A, Watanabe Y, Doi T et al (2007) Evaluation of prognostic factors and scoring systems in colonic perforation. World J Gastroenterol 13(23):3228–3231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SA, Zinner MJ (2007) An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg 204:201–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hinchey EJ, Schaal P, Richards G (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wacha H, Linder M, Feldmann U, Wesch G, Grundlach E, Streifensand R (1987) Mannheim peritonitis index—prediction of risk of death from peritonitis: construction of a statistical and validation of an empirically based index. Theor Surg 1:169–177Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anon (1963) New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 24:111Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tekkis PP, Prytherch D, Kocher H et al (2004) Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91:1174–1182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aydin HN, Tekkis PP, Remzi FH, Constantinides V, Fazio VW (2006) Evaluation of the risk of a nonrestorative resection for the treatment of diverticular disease: the Cleveland Clinic diverticular disease propensity score. Dis Colon Rectum 49:629–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wedell J, Banzhaf G, Chaoui R, Fischer R, Reichmann J (1997) Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg 84:380–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Biondo S, Perea MT, Ragué JM, Parés D, Jaurrieta E (2001) One-stage procedure in non-elective surgery for diverticular disease complications. Colorectal Dis 3:42–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Constantinides V, Tekkis P, Senapati A (2006) Prospective multicentre evaluation of adverse outcomes following treatment for complicated diverticular disease. Br J Surg 93:1503–1513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Biondo S, Ramos E, Deiros M et al (2000) Prognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis: a new scoring system. J Am Coll Surg 191:635–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    DE KWA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mulier S, Penninckx F, Verwaest C et al (2003) Factors affecting mortality in generalized postoperative peritonitis: multivariate analysis in 96 patients. World J Surg 27:379–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Constantinides VA, Heriot A et al (2007) Operative strategies for diverticular peritonitis: a decision analysis between primary resection and anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedures. Ann Surg 245:94–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rix TE, Bates T (2007) Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery. World J Emergency Surg 2(16):10.1186/1749-7922-2-16Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hartley M (1994) The surgeon's "gut feeling" as a predictor of postoperative outcome. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76:277–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Markus P, Martell J, Leister I, Horstmann O, Brinker J, Becker H (2005) Predicting post-operative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cook T, Britton D, Craft T, Jones C, Horrocks M (1997) An audit of hospital mortality after urgent and emergency surgery in the elderly. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79:361–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hobson S, Sutton C, Garcea G, Thomas W (2007) Prospective comparison of POSSUM and p-POSSUM with clinical assessment of mortality following emergency surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 51:94–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Itai Pasternak
    • 1
  • Michael Dietrich
    • 1
  • Richard Woodman
    • 2
  • Urs Metzger
    • 1
  • David A. Wattchow
    • 3
  • Urs Zingg
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryTriemli HospitalZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of General PracticeFlinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical CentreFlinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia
  4. 4.Discipline of SurgeryUniversity of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations