Confocal chromolaser endomicroscopy: a supplemental diagnostic tool prior to transanal endoscopic microsurgery of rectal tumors?
- 129 Downloads
Due to diagnostic advancements, preoperative staging of rectal tumors was significantly improved. However, difficulties in obtaining accurate results can sometimes be observed in the staging of adenomas and early rectal carcinomas (pT1/2). The aim of this study was to test if confocal chromolaser endomicroscopy (cCLEM) can help minimize this diagnostic gap.
cCLEM generates optical transversal sections at ×1,000 magnification and allows for evaluation of the mucosal microarchitecture and differentiation of normal mucosa from adenomas and carcinomas. Cases with conflicting preoperative findings (adenoma vs. ≥uT2 categories), undetectable tumors after inadequate (R1/RX) snare polypectomy of carcinomas, and extremely flat adenoma areas were studied.
By cCLEM, in ≥uT2 carcinomas with an adenoma histology, malignoma-suspicious areas were identified and selected biopsies were done. In addition, re-epithelialized polypectomy areas of carcinomas were visualized and targeted reoperations could be carried out. Furthermore, the dignity and extension of extremely flat adenomas were determined and marked by clips for additional therapy.
In cases with rectal tumors, conflicting or unclear findings, and flat extending adenomas, the utilization of cCLEM should be considered. Especially in cases with early rectal carcinomas, unnecessary second operations and also recurrences can be minimized or even avoided by selective usage of cCLEM.
KeywordsRectal cancer Local excision Confocal chromolaser endomicroscopy
- 10.American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (2002) In: Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch ChM, Haller DG, Morrow M (eds) Cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.UICC (2002) In: Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (eds) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 14.Delaney PM, Harris MR (1995) Fiberoptics in confocal microscopy. In: Pawley JB (ed) Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. Plenum, New York, pp 515–523Google Scholar
- 19.Kakeji Y, Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D, Tanoue K, Ueda M, Masunari A, Utsunomiya T, Imamura M, Honda H, Maehara Y, Hashizume M (2006) Development and assessment of morphologic criteria for diagnosing gastric cancer using confocal endomicroscopy: an ex vivo and in vivo study. Endoscopy 38:886–890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Assenat E, Thézenas S, Samalin E, Bibeau F, Portales F, Azria D, Quenet F, Rouanet P, Saint Aubert B, Senesse P (2007) The value of endoscopic rectal ultrasound in predicting the lateral clearance and outcome in patients with lower-third rectal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopy 39:309–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Lobo AJ, McAlindon ME, Cross SS (2005) Indigo carmine assisted high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the detection and characterisation of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: a prospective evaluation. Endoscopy 37:1186–1192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Dekker E, van den Broek FJ, Reitsma JB, Hardwick JC, Offerhaus GJ, van Deventer SJ, Hommes DW, Fockens P (2007) Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis. Endoscopy 39:216–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar