International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 1219–1225 | Cite as

Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything?

Original Article

Abstract

Background

Patients who undergo a Hartmann’s procedure may not be offered a reversal due to concerns over the morbidity of the second procedure. The aims of this study were to examine the morbidity post reversal of Hartmann’s procedure.

Methods

Patients who underwent a Hartmann’s procedure for acute diverticulitis (Hinchey 3 or 4) between 1995 and 2006 were studied. Clinical factors including patient comorbidities were analysed to elucidate what preoperative factors were associated with complications following reversal of Hartmann’s procedure.

Results

One hundred and ten patients were included. Median age was 70 years and 56% of the cohort were male (n = 61). The mortality and morbidity rate for the acute presentation was 7.3% (n = 8) and 34% (n = 37) respectively. Seventy six patients (69%) underwent a reversal at a median of 7 months (range 3–22 months) post-Hartmann’s procedure. The complication rate in the reversal group was 25% (n = 18). A history of current smoking (p = 0.004), increasing time to reversal (p = 0.04) and low preoperative albumin (p = 0.003) were all associated with complications following reversal.

Conclusions

Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure can be offered to appropriately selected patients though with a significant (25%) morbidity rate. The identification of potential modifiable factors such as current smoking, prolonged time to reversal and low preoperative albumin may allow optimisation of such patients preoperatively.

Keywords

Hartmann’s Reversal Complications Comorbidity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. J. Saunders, Statistical Consulting Unit University of Limerick, for her invaluable assistance with the statistical analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Rothenberger DA, Wiltz O (1993) Surgery for complicated diverticulitis. Surg Clin North Am 73:975–992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Sahaf O, Al-Azawi D, Fauzi MZ et al (2008) Early discharge policy of patients with acute colonic diverticulitis following initial CT scan. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:979–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bannerjee S, Leather AJ, Rennie JA et al (2005) Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann’s. Colorectal Dis 7:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pearce NW, Scott SD, Karran SJ (1992) Timing and method of reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Br J Surg 79(8):839–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oomen JL, Cuesta MA, Engel AF (2005) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure after surgery for complications of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon is safe and possible in most patients. Dig Surg 22:419–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wigmore SJ, Duthie GS, Young IE et al (1995) Restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann’s procedure: the Lothian experience 1987–1992. Br J Surg 82:27–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ReMine SG, Dozois RR (1981) Hartmann’s procedure—it’s use with complicated carcinomas of sigmoid colon and rectum. Arch Surg 116:630–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U et al (1987) The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis. Chirug 58(2):84–92Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lorimer JW, Doumit G (2007) Comorbidity is a major determinant of severity in acute diverticulitis. Am J Surg 193:681–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breitenstein S, Kraus A, Hahnloser D et al (2007) Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation. Primary anastamosis or Hartmann’s procedure? A case-matched control study. World J Surg 31:2117–2124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roque-Castellano C, Marchena-Gomez J, Hemmersbach-Miller M et al (2007) Analysis of the factors related to the decision of restoring intestinal continuity after Hartmann’s procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1091–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sorensen LT, Hemmingsen U, Kallehave F et al (2005) Risk factors for tissue and wound complications in gastrointestinal surgery. Ann Surg 241(4):654–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kruschewski M, Rieger H, Pohlen U et al (2007) Risk factors for clinical anastamotic leakage and postoperative mortality in elective surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:919–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sorensen LT, Jorgensen T (2003) Short-term smoking cessation intervention does not affect postoperative complications in colorectal surgery: a randomised clinical trial. Colorectal Dis 5:347–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindstrom D, Azodi OS, Wladis A et al (2008) Effects of a perioperative smoking cessation intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised trial. Ann Surg 248(5):739–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moller AM, Villebro N, Pedersen T et al (2002) Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 359:114–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmelzer TM, Mostafa G, Norton J et al (2007) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: a high risk operation? Surgery 14294:598–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gibbs J, Cull W, Henderson W et al (1999) Preoperative serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity. Arch Surg 134:36–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bozzetti F, Gianotti L, Braga M et al (2007) Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients: the joint role of the nutritional status and the nutritional support. Clin Nutr 26:698–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roe AM, Prabhu S, Ali A et al (1991) Reversal of Hartmann’s procedure: timing and operative technique. Br J Surg 78:1167–1170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Regenet N, Pessaux P, Hennekinne S et al (2003) Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann’s procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis 18(6):503–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abbas S (2007) Resection and primary anastomosis in acute complicated diverticulitis, a systematic review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis 22(4):351–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Constantinides VA, Heriot A, Remzi F et al (2007) Operative strategies for diverticular peritonitis: a decision analysis between primary resection and anastamosis versus Hartmann’s procedures. Ann Surg 245(1):94–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mazeh H, Greenstein AJ, Swedish K et al (2009) Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann’s procedure—a comparative retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 23(3):496–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H et al (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Surgical Professorial Unit, Department of SurgeryOur Lady of Lourdes HospitalDroghedaIreland

Personalised recommendations