Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

Case Report

Abstract

Background

Single port access (SPA) surgery is a rapidly evolving field as it combines some of the cosmetic advantage of the Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and allows performing surgical procedure with standard surgical instruments. We report in this paper a new technique of umbilical SPA right hemicolectomy with conventional surgical oncologic principle and technique of minimally invasive colectomy.

Methods

Preliminary experience with umbilical SPA right hemicolectomy in a patient with degenerated ascending colon polyp.

Results

Umbilical SPA right hemicolectomy was feasible with conventional laparoscopic instruments. Carcinologic surgical principle can be respected using this technique as pathological specimen had sufficient surgical margins (>10 cm) and lymph nodes (33). Operative time was 158 min. No peroperative or postoperative complications were recorded.

Conclusion

SPA right hemicolectomy is feasible and safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. SPA right hemicolectomy may have the advantage over NOTES approach to offer the safety of laparoscopic colectomy especially for haemostasis and anastomosis. It has to be determined whether or not this approach would offer benefit to patients, except in cosmesis, compared to standard laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Keywords

Single port access (SPA) Colectomy Laparoscopy NOTES Minimally invasive surgery Technique Scarless surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Liang J, Lai H, Lee P (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1878–1879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim J, Edwards E, Bowne W, Castro A, Moon V, Gadangi P, Ferzli G (2007) Medial-to-lateral laparoscopic colon resection: a view beyond the learning curve. Surg Endosc 21:1503–1507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2007) Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial. Ann Surg 246:1010–1014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tong D, Law W (2007) Laparoscopic versus open right colectomy for carcinoma of the colon. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 11:76–80Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bucher P, Wuthrich P, Pugin F, Gonzalez M, Gervaz P, Morel P (2008) Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using circular stapler. Surg Endosc 22:1278–1282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson J, Dogiparthi K, Hebblethwaite N, Clarke M (2007) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with posterior colpotomy for transvaginal specimen retrieval. Colorectal Dis 9:662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lacy A, Delgado S, Rojas O, Almenara R, Blasi A, Llach J (2008) MA-NOS radical sigmoidectomy: report of a transvaginal resection in the human. Surg Endosc 22:1717–1723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Drelichman E (2008) Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 67:854–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li W, Xiao J (2008) Investigation for acceptance of natural orifice Translumenal Endoscopic surgery by inpatients with digestive disease. Gastrointest Endosc 67:AB120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaouk J, Haber G, Goel R, Desai M, Aron M, Rackley R, Moore C, Gill I (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu J (2007) Scarless endoscopic surgery: NOTES or TUES. Surg Endosc 21:1898–1899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pearl J, Ponsky J (2007) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. J Gastrointest Surg Dec 5 Epud ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whiteford M, Denk P, Swanstrom L (2007) Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 21:1870–1874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Minimally invasive necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 36:113–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ponsky J, Cherullo E, Sawyer M, Hartke D (2008) Single access site laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. J Endourol 22:663–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gettman M, Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J, Cherullo E, Clayman R, Desai M, Frank I, Gill I, Gupta M, Haber G, Humphreys M, Kaouk J, Landman J, Lima E, Ponsky L (2008) Consensus statement on Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery: heralding a new era in urology. Eur Urol 53:1117–1120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pomp A (2008) Notes on NOTES: the emperor is not wearing any clothes. Surg Endosc 22:283–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaouk J, Palmer J (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: initial experience in children for varicelectomy. BJU 102:97–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desai M, Rao P, Aron M, Pascal-Haber G, Desai M, Mishra S, Kaouk J, Gill I (2008) Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int 101:83–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ates O, Hakguber G, Olguner M, Akgur F (2007) Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy conducted intracorporeally with the aid of a transabdominal sling suture. J Pediatr Surg 42:1071–1074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Swanstrom L, Zheng B (2008) Spatial orientation and Off-Axis challenges for NOTES. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 18:315–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mintz Y, Horgan S, Cullen J, Ramamoorthy S, Chock A, Savu M, Easter D, Talamini M (2007) NOTES: the hybrid technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:402–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ASGE., SAGES (2006) ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery White Paper 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pigazzi A, Hellan M, Ewing D, Paz B, Ballantyne G (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral dissection: how and why. J Gastrointest Surg 11:778–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dunker M, Stiggelbout A, Van Hogezand R, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman W (1998) Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 12:1334–1340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cuesta M, Berends F, Veenhof A (2008) The “invisible cholecystectomy": a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar. Surg Endosc 22:1211–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bhoyrul S, Payne J, Steffes B, Swanstrom L, Way L (2000) A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 4:392–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Loriau J, Manaouil D, Verhaeghe P (2002) Celioscopie: les éventration sur orifice de trocarts. Ann Chir 127:252–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lewis J (1995) A simple technique for anticipating and managing secondary puncture site hemorrhage during laparoscopic surgery. A report of two cases. J Reprod Med 40:729–730PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rane A, Rao P, Rao P (2008) Single-Port-Access Nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedure using a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port). Urology May 9 Epud ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buess G, Cuschieri A (2007) Raising our heads above the parapet: ES not NOTES. Surg Endosc 21:835–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascal Bucher
    • 1
    • 2
  • François Pugin
    • 1
  • Philippe Morel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations