Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 1109–1115 | Cite as

Considerations on the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a view from the bottom

  • S. Leong
  • R. A. Cahill
  • B. J. Mehigan
  • R. B. Stephens
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Those who have surmounted the learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resection state that considerable numbers of highly selected cases should comprise a department’s early experience to ensure reliability of technique before routine implementation. The objective of this study was to determine how this advice may interrupt case flow.

Methods

Details on all colorectal operations performed in a single institution over a 4-year period were gleaned from a prospectively maintained database. Patient profiles were scrutinised to identify how the application of various published exclusion criteria would impact upon the theoretical completion rates of our proposed learning curve.

Results

In total, 317 colorectal resections were performed; 259 operations were for adenocarcinoma (including 100 rectal tumours) while 58 were for benign disease. Of those with malignancy, 25(10%) were obese, 61(24%) had previous intra-abdominal surgery, while 52(20%) were aged over 80 years and 60(23%) were ASA ¾. Strictest exclusion criteria would halve the number of cases to be commenced laparoscopically. A specialist registrar rotating through the department would have case exposure cut from a mean of 33 to 11 in 6 months under this regimen. Prioritising benign cases in the initial experience as has been recommended by certain groups would mean that, at most, 1.2 cases would be performed every 4 weeks during the learning period.

Conclusion

Although our caseload seems sufficient to allow the acquisition of expertise in a timely fashion, procedural flow would be markedly interrupted by stringent pre-selection. A low threshold for initiating the procedure laparoscopically seems a pragmatic way of ensuring departmental confidence through familiarity.

Keywords

Laparoscopic colorectal resection Colorectal cancer Learning curve Minimally invasive surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44:217–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mackeigan JM (1995) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy? Am Surg 61:681–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, Christen D, Buchmann P (2003) Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight year results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1371–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Bruch HP (1999) Advanced age-indication or contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 42:356–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leroy J, Ananian P, Rubino F, Claudon B, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2005) The impact of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic left colectomy. Ann Surg 241:69–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, Casillas S, Kiran RP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2005) Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patient with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:975–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19:47–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le Moine MC, Fabre JM, Vacher C, Navarro F, Picot MC, Domergue J (2003) Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Br J Surg 90:232–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ballesta Lopez C, Ruggiero R, Poves I, Bettonica C, Procaccini E, Corsale I, Mandato M, De Luca L (2003) Laparoscopic procedures in patients who have previously undergone laparotomic operations. Minerva Chir 58:53–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Adams J, Beart RW Jr (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132:41–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 47:1680–1685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2006) A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases. Am J Surg 191:377–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Bruch H (1999) The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 132:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schwandner O, Farke S, Schiedeck TH, Bruch HP (2004) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: do differences in body mass indices lead to different outcomes? Surg Endosc 18:1452–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reissman P, Agachan F, Wexner SD (1996) Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in older patients. Am Surg 62:1060–1063PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11:331–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Leong
    • 1
  • R. A. Cahill
    • 1
  • B. J. Mehigan
    • 1
  • R. B. Stephens
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Colorectal SurgerySt. James’s HospitalDublin 8Ireland

Personalised recommendations