International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 1071–1075 | Cite as

Factors affecting continence after fistulotomy for intersphincteric fistula-in-ano

  • Takayuki Toyonaga
  • Makoto Matsushima
  • Takashi Kiriu
  • Nobuhito Sogawa
  • Hiroki Kanyama
  • Naomi Matsumura
  • Yasuhiro Shimojima
  • Tomoaki Hatakeyama
  • Yoshiaki Tanaka
  • Kazunori Suzuki
  • Masao Tanaka
Original Article

Abstract

Background and aims

This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of and risk factors for anal incontinence after fistulotomy for intersphincteric fistula-in-ano. We also evaluated the role of anal manometry in preoperative assessment of intersphincteric fistula.

Materials and methods

A prospective, observational study was undertaken in 148 patients who underwent fistulotomy for intersphincteric fistula between January and December 2004. Functional results were assessed by standard questionnaire and anal manometry. Possible factors predicting postoperative incontinence were examined by univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 12 months. Postoperative anal incontinence occurred in 30 patients (20.3%), i.e., soiling in 6, incontinence for flatus in 27, and incontinence for liquid stool in 4. Fistulotomy significantly decreased maximum resting pressure (85.9 ± 20.4 to 60.2 ± 18.4 mmHg, P < 0.0001) and length of the high pressure zone (3.92 ± 0.69 to 3.82 ± 0.77 cm, P = 0.035), but it did not affect voluntary contraction pressure (164.7 ± 85.2 to 160.3 ± 84.8 mmHg, P = 0.2792). Multivariate analysis showed low voluntary contraction pressure and multiple previous drainage surgeries to be independent risk factors for postoperative incontinence.

Conclusion

Fistulotomy produces a satisfactory outcome in terms of eradicating sepsis and preserving function in the vast majority of patients with intersphincteric fistula with intact sphincters. However, sphincter-preserving treatment may be advocated for patients with low preoperative voluntary contraction pressure or those who have undergone multiple drainage surgeries. Preoperative anal manometry is useful in determining the proper surgical procedure.

Keywords

Anal fistula Intersphincteric fistula Fistulotomy Fecal incontinence Anal manometry 

References

  1. 1.
    Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK (1994) Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 81:1382–1385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC (1994) Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1194–1197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamalainen KP, Sainio AP (1997) Cutting seton for anal fistulas: high risk of minor control defects. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1443–1446; discussion 1447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho YH, Tan M, Leong AF, Seow-Choen F (1998) Marsupialization of fistulotomy wounds improves healing: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 85:105–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mylonakis E, Katsios C, Godevenos D, Nousias B, Kappas AM (2001) Quality of life of patients after surgical treatment of anal fistula; the role of anal manometry. Colorectal Dis 3:417–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang SC, Lin JK (2003) Change in anal continence after surgery for intersphincteral anal fistula: a functional and manometric study. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:111–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia-Aguilar J, Davey CS, Le CT, Lowry AC, Rothenberger DA (2000) Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1206–1212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cavanaugh M, Hyman N, Osler T (2002) Fecal incontinence severity index after fistulotomy: a predictor of quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 45:349–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malouf AJ, Buchanan GN, Carapeti EA, Rao S, Guy RJ, Westcott E, Thomson JP, Cohen CR (2002) A prospective audit of fistula-in-ano at St. Mark’s hospital. Colorectal Dis 4:13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aguilar PS, Plasencia G, Hardy TG Jr, Hartmann RF, Stewart WR (1985) Mucosal advancement in the treatment of anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 28:496–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Athanasiadis S, Kohler A, Nafe M (1994) Treatment of high anal fistulae by primary occlusion of the internal ostium, drainage of the intersphincteric space, and mucosal advancement flap. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:153–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gustafsson UM, Graf W (2002) Excision of anal fistula with closure of the internal opening: functional and manometric results. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1672–1678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koehler A, Risse-Schaaf A, Athanasiadis S (2004) Treatment for horseshoe fistulas-in-ano with primary closure of the internal fistula opening: a clinical and manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1874–1882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kreis ME, Jehle EC, Ohlemann M, Becker HD, Starlinger MJ (1998) Functional results after transanal rectal advancement flap repair of trans-sphincteric fistula. Br J Surg 85:240–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Holdsworth PJ, Sagar PM, Stephenson BM (1995) Clinical results and manometric studies after rectal flap advancement for infra-levator trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:189–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eckardt VF, Kanzler G (1993) How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Int J Colorectal Dis 8:95–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cintron JR, Park JJ, Orsay CP, Pearl RK, Nelson RL, Sone JH, Song R, Abcarian H (2000) Repair of fistulas-in-ano using fibrin adhesive: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 43:944–949; discussion 949–950PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park JJ, Cintron JR, Orsay CP, Pearl RK, Nelson RL, Sone J, Song R, Abcarian H (2000) Repair of chronic anorectal fistulae using commercial fibrin sealant. Arch Surg 135:166–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:371–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Connor L, Champagne BJ, Ferguson MA, Orangio GR, Schertzer ME, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of Crohn’s anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1569–1573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takayuki Toyonaga
    • 1
  • Makoto Matsushima
    • 1
  • Takashi Kiriu
    • 1
  • Nobuhito Sogawa
    • 1
  • Hiroki Kanyama
    • 1
  • Naomi Matsumura
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Shimojima
    • 1
  • Tomoaki Hatakeyama
    • 1
  • Yoshiaki Tanaka
    • 1
  • Kazunori Suzuki
    • 1
  • Masao Tanaka
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMatsushima Hospital Colo-Proctology CenterYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations