Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study
- 175 Downloads
Short-term and mid-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) were compared with those for Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy (FH) for treating hemorrhoids.
Materials and methods
Patients with prolapsed hemorrhoids were randomized into two groups treated with SH (N = 300) and FH (N = 296) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi in Taiwan between January 2002 and December 2004. The outcomes of the procedures were evaluated postoperatively (short-term, i.e., intra-/postoperative conditions, hospital stay, pain intensity scoring, time off work, and procedure-related morbidity) and over a follow-up period of minimum 18 months (mid-term, i.e., relapse of prolapse and/or bleeding, anal stricture, anal sepsis, and the acceptability of the procedures to the patients).
SH was superior to FH in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain intensity, and return to work. Based on telephone interviews over the follow-up period, most patients who received SH appreciated the procedure better than those with FH.
This study confirms that SH generates less postoperative suffering, less time off work, and more complete resolution of primary symptoms associated with hemorrhoids in the mid-term follow-up than FH.
KeywordsStapled hemorrhoidopexy Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy Hemorrhoids Prospective Randomized
- 1.Corman ML (ed) (2005) Hemorrhoids. In: Colon & rectal surgery, 5th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 177Google Scholar
- 2.Longo A (1998) Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the 6th world congress of endoscopic surgery, Rome, Italy, 3–6 June 1998Google Scholar
- 3.Singer MA, Cintron JR, Fleshman JW, Chaudry V, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Spitz JS, Abcarian H (2002) Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 45:260–267Google Scholar
- 8.Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H, Fleshman J, Corman M, Wexner S, Nivatvongs S (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824–1836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ho Y-H, Cheong W-K, Tsang C, Ho J, Tang C-L, Seow-Choen F (2000) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy “ cost and effectiveness: randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal monometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Huang WS, Wang JY, Chin CC (2003) Stapled hemorrhoidectomy with PPH-33 versus conventional Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: preliminary analysis in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. J Soc Colorectal Surg ROC 14:33–38Google Scholar
- 27.Corman ML, Gravie JF, Hager T, Loudon MA, Mascagni D, Mystrom PO, Seow-Choen F, Abcarian H, Marcello P, Weiss E, Longo A (2003) Stapled Haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party-indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 5:304–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Huang WS, Chin CC, Yeh CH, Lin PY, Wang JY (2006) The late onset of an anal abscess caused by a chicken bone that complicated stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis (in press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0160-3. Cited 27 May 2006