Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 834–839 | Cite as

Clinical spectrum and surgical approach of adult intussusceptions: a multicentric study

  • M. Barussaud
  • N. Regenet
  • X. Briennon
  • B. de Kerviler
  • P. Pessaux
  • N. Kohneh-Sharhi
  • P. A. Lehur
  • A. Hamy
  • J. Leborgne
  • J. C. le Neel
  • E. Mirallie
Original Article

Abstract

Background

The preoperative diagnosis of adult intussusceptions (AIs) remains difficult, and the assessment of the radiological methods has been evaluated very little in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of the different imaging modalities for the preoperative diagnosis of AI and describe causes of AI.

Patients and methods

Consecutive patients of 15 years and older with the postoperative diagnosis of intussusception from 1979 to 2004 were reviewed retrospectively for this multicentric study. Data concerning clinical considerations, morphological examinations, surgical procedure, histological conclusions, mortality rate and recurrence were analysed.

Results

Forty-four patients with documented intussusception were included. The mean age was 51 years (15–93 years). The preoperative diagnosis of intussusception was made in 52% of the cases. The sensitivities of the different radiological methods were abdominal ultrasounds (35%), upper gastrointestinal barium study (33%), abdominal computed tomography (CT) (58%) and barium enema (73%). An organic lesion was identified in 95% of the cases. There was 29 enteric and 15 colonic (including appendicular) intussusceptions. Thirty-seven percent of the enteric lesions were malignant, and a bit less than 50% of them were metastatic melanomas. The benign enteric lesions were Meckel’s diverticulum and Peutz–Jeghers syndrome in half of the cases. Fifty-eight percent of the pure colonic lesions (excluding appendix) were malignant, and 85% of them were primary adenocarcinomas. The benign colonic lesions were lipomas in 80% of the cases. All patients, except one, had a surgical treatment, and 13 of them had a complete reduction of the intussusception before resection. The mortality rate was 16% and recurrence occurred in three patients; two of them had a Peutz–Jeghers syndrome.

Conclusion

Intussusception rarely occurs in adults, but nearly half of their causes are malignant. The CT scan is a helpful examination for enteric intussusceptions whether barium enema seems to be the most performing method for colonic lesions. Surgery is the recommended treatment, with or without a primary reduction of the intussusception. During the surgical procedure, this reduction can lead to a more limited bowel resection.

Keywords

Adult intussusception Management Clinical relevant 

Abbreviations

AI

Adult intussusception

CT scan

computed tomography scanning

References

  1. 1.
    Azar T, Berger D (1997) Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 226(2):134–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagorney DM, Sarr MG, McIlrath DC (1981) Surgical management of intussusception in the adult. Ann Surg 193:230–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haas EM, Etter EL, Ellis S, Taylor TV (2003) Adult intussusception. Am J Surg 186:75–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eisen LK, Cunningham JD, Aufses AH (1999) Intussusception in adults: institutional review. J Am Coll Surg 188:390–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lvoff N, Breiman RS, Coakley FV, Lu Y, Warren RS (2003) Distinguishing features of self-limiting adult small-bowel intussusception identified at CT. Radiology 227:68–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruel JM, Gallix B, Achard C, Pierredon MA, Molina E (2003) Multidetector CT and MRI in diseases of the GI tract. J Radiol 84:499–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang BY, Warshauer DM (2003) Adult intussusception: diagnosis and clinical relevance. Radiol Clin North Am 41:1137–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cherki S, Adham M, Bizollon T, Gaudin JL, Baulieux J (2002) Intussusception of the small bowel due to Peutz–Jeghers syndrome: a case report and literature review. Ann Chir 127:714–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurugoglu S, Aksoy H, Kantarcy F, Cetinkaya S, Mihmanli I, Korman U (2003) Radiological work-up in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 33:766–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giardiello FM, Brensinger JD, Tersmette AC, Goodman SN, Petersen GM, Offerhauss JA et al (2000) Very high risk of cancer in familial Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. Gastroenterology 119:1447–1453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Barussaud
    • 1
  • N. Regenet
    • 2
  • X. Briennon
    • 3
  • B. de Kerviler
    • 4
  • P. Pessaux
    • 3
  • N. Kohneh-Sharhi
    • 5
  • P. A. Lehur
    • 2
  • A. Hamy
    • 5
  • J. Leborgne
    • 2
  • J. C. le Neel
    • 1
  • E. Mirallie
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Digestive Surgery ACHUNantes CedexFrance
  2. 2.Department of Digestive Surgery 2CHUNantes CedexFrance
  3. 3.Department of Digestive SurgeryCHUAngersFrance
  4. 4.Department of Digestive SurgeryCHDLa Roche-sur-Yon CedexFrance
  5. 5.Department of Digestive Surgery 1CHUNantes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations