Advertisement

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 668–669 | Cite as

Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial

  • Marcello PicchioEmail author
  • Domenico Palimento
  • Ugo Attanasio
  • Andrea Renda
Original Article

Abstract

Background and aims

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a relatively new procedure, and studies on long-term outcomes are few. We present the results of a 5-year follow-up on patients recruited to a randomized controlled trial comparing stapled and Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

Patients and methods

We performed telephone interviews and office visits between May and July 2005 on patients who had taken part in a randomized controlled trial from May 1999 to December 2000.

Results

Occasional pain and bleeding were referred by the patients with no difference between the two groups. The patients were also equally satisfied with both procedures. No recurrent hemorrhoidal prolapse or stenosis was detected at anorectal exploration and rigid sigmoidoscopy.

Conclusion

Both stapled and Milligan–Morgan techniques guarantee satisfactory long-term results. Larger studies are needed to assess the durability of stapled hemorrhoidectomy.

Keywords

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy Conventional hemorrhoidectomy Long-term randomized trial 

References

  1. 1.
    Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systemic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Palimento D, Picchio M, Attanasio U, Lombardi A, Bambini C, Renda A (2003) Stapled and open hemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 27:203–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guenin MO, Rosenthal R, Kern B, Peterli R, von Flue M, Ackermann C (2005) Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results and patient satisfaction after Ferguson’s hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 78:1523–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett RC, Friedman MH, Goligher JC (1962) The late results of haemorrhoidectomy by ligature and excision. BMJ 2:216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johannsson HO, Graf W, Pahlman L (2002) Long-term results of haemorrhoidectomy. Eur J Surg 168:485–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pernice LM, Bartolucci B, Bencini L, Borri A, Catarzi S, Kroenig K (2001) Early and late (ten years) experience with circular stapler hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 44:836–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Di Cataldo A, Licata A (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, Laurent B, Regenet N, Lermite E, Simone M, Huten N, De Manzini N, Arnaud JP (2004) Morbidity after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: long- term results about 140 patients and review of the literature. Ann Chir 129:571–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smyth E, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JRT (2003) Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 361:1437–1438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM (2004) Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy; a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis 6:37–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Picchio
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Domenico Palimento
    • 3
  • Ugo Attanasio
    • 4
  • Andrea Renda
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryHospital “A. Fiorini”TerracinaItaly
  2. 2.Via S. BoccapaduliRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryHospital “S. Paolo”NaplesItaly
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryHospital “S. Rocco”Sessa AuruncaItaly
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryUniversity “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations