International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 24–27 | Cite as

Surgical management of cecal diverticulitis: is diverticulectomy enough?

  • B. Papaziogas
  • J. Makris
  • I. Koutelidakis
  • G.  Paraskevas
  • B. Oikonomou
  • E. Papadopoulos
  • K. Atmatzidis
Original Article



Cecal diverticulitis is a rare condition in the western population. The optimal management of this condition is still controversial, ranging from conservative antibiotic treatment to aggressive resection. We present our experience of the surgical management of eight cases of cecal diverticulitis over a 25-year period.

Patients and methods

The mean age of the patients was 54.2 years. Five patients underwent diverticulectomy, 2 patients underwent ileocecal resection, and 1 patient underwent suture of the perforated diverticulum.


The postoperative course of all patients was uneventful. At long-term follow-up (mean 14.6 years, range 1–25 years) none of the patients who underwent diverticulectomy, mentioned any symptom or complication.


We conclude that diverticulectomy, if technically feasible, could be considered as adequate therapy for cecal diverticulitis. Aggressive resection should be considered in cases of extensive inflammatory changes.


Cecal diverticule Diverticulitis Diverticulectomy 


  1. 1.
    Sardi A, Gokli A, Singer JA (1987) Diverticular disease of the cecum and ascending colon. A review of 881 cases. Am Surg 53:41–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    El Nakadi B, Greuse M, el Nakadi I (1990) Solitary diverticulum of the cecum: apropos of 2 cases. Acta Chir Belg 90:231–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shetgiri P, Angel L, Lebenthal A, Divino CM (2001) Cecal diverticulitis: a case report and review of the current literature. Int Surg 86:191–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harada RN, Whelan TJ Jr (1993) Surgical management of cecal diverticulitis. Am J Surg 166:666–669PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fang JF, Chen RJ, Lin BC, Hsu YB, Kao JL, Chen MF (2003) Aggressive resection is indicated for cecal diverticulitis. Am J Surg 185:135–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lane JS, Sarkar R, Schmit PJ, Chandler CF, Thompson JE Jr (1999) Surgical approach to cecal diverticulitis. J Am Coll Surg 188:629–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adam C, Bottcher K (2000) Cecal diverticulitis. Zentralbl Chir 125:467–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keidar S, Pappo I, Shperber Y, Orda R (2000) Cecal diverticulitis: a diagnostic challenge. Dig Surg 17:508–512Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zago A, Tosi D, Vicenzi L, Carolo F, Brazzarola P, Piccinelli D, Rosa G (1997) Perforated diverticulum of the cecum: a difficult preoperative diagnosis. Ann Ital Chir 68:347–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmit PJ, Bennion RS, Thompson JE Jr (1991) Cecal diverticulitis: a continuing diagnostic dilemma. World J Surg 15:367–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oudenhoven LFIJ, Koumans RKJ, Puylaert JBCM (1998) Right colonic diverticulitis: US and CT findings. New insights about frequency and natural history. Radiology 206:611–618Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jang HJ, Lim HK, Lee SJ, Lee WJ, Kim EY, Kim SH (2000) Acute diverticulitis of the cecum and ascending colon: the value of thin-section helical CT findings in excluding colonic carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 174:1397–1402Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fluckiger R, Styger S, Huber A (1998) Diverticulitis of the cecum and ascending colon. Chirurg 69:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ngoi SS, Dhia J, Goh MY et al (1992) Surgical approach to cecal diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 35:629–635Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Papaziogas
    • 1
  • J. Makris
    • 1
  • I. Koutelidakis
    • 1
  • G.  Paraskevas
    • 1
  • B. Oikonomou
    • 1
  • E. Papadopoulos
    • 1
  • K. Atmatzidis
    • 1
  1. 1.Second Surgical Clinic of the Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations