International Journal of Colorectal Disease

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 503–507 | Cite as

Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann's procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon

  • N. Regenet
  • P. Pessaux
  • S. Hennekinne
  • E. Lermite
  • J. J. Tuech
  • O. Brehant
  • J. P. Arnaud
Original Article


Background and aims

For complicated diverticulitis Hartmann's procedure remains the favored option in patients with acute complicated sigmoid disease, but there has been increasing interest in primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative colonic lavage. This study compared primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage and Hartmann's procedure.

Patients and methods

Between January 1994 and November 2001, 60 patients underwent emergency laparotomy for diverticular peritonitis (Hinchey stages III and IV). Primary resection and anastomosis with intraoperative colonic lavage was performed in 27 patients and Hartmann's procedure in 33. All data were collected prospectively on a standardized form.


Mortality with intraoperative colonic lavage was 11% and with Hartmann's procedure 12%. The incidence of postoperative complication was significantly higher after Hartmann's procedure. The mean hospital stay was significantly longer after Hartmann's procedure than after primary resection with intraoperative colic lavage.


Primary resection with intraoperative colonic lavage compares favorably with Hartmann's procedure for diffuse purulent peritonitis in complicated diverticulitis. It should be an alternative to Hartmann's procedure in stercoral peritonitis.


Diverticulitis Peritonitis Primary resection Intracolonic lavage Hartman's procedure 


  1. 1.
    Zeitoun G, Laurent A, Rouffet F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Pacquet JC, Peillon C and the French Associations for Surgical Research (2000) Multicenter, randomized clinical trial of primary versus secondary sigmoid resection in generalized peritonitis complicating sigmoid diverticulitis. Br J Surg 87:1366–1374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belmonte C, Klas JV, Javier Perez J, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) The Hartmann's procedure: first choice or last resort in diverticular disease? Arch Surg 131:612–615Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wigmore SS, Duthie GS, Young IE, Spalding EM, Rainey JB (1995) Restoration of intestinal continuity following Hartmann's procedure. The Lahey's experience 87–92. Br J Surg 82:27–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Forloni B, Reduzzi R, Paludetti A, Colpani L, Cavallari G, Frosali D (1998) Intraoperative colonic lavage in emergency surgical treatment of left-sided colonic obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 41:23–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dudley H, Radcliffe AG, McGeehan D (1980) Intra-operative irrigation of the colon to permit primary anastomosis. Br J Surg 67:80–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kressner U, Antonsson J, Ejerblad S, Gerdin B, Pahlman L (1994) Intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis—an alternative to Hartmann's procedure in emergency surgery of the left colon. Eur J Surg 160:287–292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee ES, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Roberts P, Schoetz DJ (1997) Intraoperative colonic lavage in non-elective surgery for diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 40:669–674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Marti Ragué J, Ramos E, Deiros M, Moreno P, Farran L (2000) Role of resection and primary anastomosis of the left colon in the presence of peritonitis. Br J Surg 87:1580–1584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hinchey ET, School PJ, Richards GK (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wacha H, Linder MM, Wesch G, Gundlach E, Steifensand RA (1987) Manheim peritonitis index—prediction of risk of death from peritonitis: construction of a statistical and validation of an empirically based index. Theor Surg 1:169–177Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arnaud JP, Casa C, Georgeac C, Ronceray J, Serra-Maudet V, Kanane S (1994) L'irrigation colique per-opératoire dans le traitement en urgences des lésions occlusives du colon gauche. J Chir (Paris) 131:538–540Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Biondo S, Jaurrieta E, Jorba R, Moreno P, Farran L, Borobia F et al. (1997) Intraoperative colonic lavage and primary anastomosis in peritonitis and obstruction. Br J Surg 84:222–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koruth NM, Hunter DC, Krukowski ZH, Matheson NA (1985) Immediate resection in emergency large bowel surgery: a 7 years audit. Br J Surg 72:703–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith SRG, Connolly JC, Gilmore OJA (1983) The effect of faecal loading on colonic anastomotic healing. Br J Surg 70:49–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ravo B, Metwally N, Castero P, Polanky PJ, Gei R (1988) The importance of intraluminal anastomotic faecal contact and peritonitis in colonic anastomosis leakage. Dis Colon Rectum 31:868–871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feres O, Monteiro dos Santos Jr JC, Andrade JI (2001) The role of mechanical bowel preparation for colonic resection and anastomosis: an experimental study. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:353–356Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okada M, Bothin C, Kanzawa K, Midtvedt T (1999) Experimental study of the influence of intestinal flora on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 86:961–965CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith MB, Baliga P, Sartor WM, Goradia VK, Holmes JW, Nichols RL (1991) Intraoperative colonic lavage: failure to decrease mucosal microflora. South Med J 84:38–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tang R, Chen HH, Wang YL, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM, Wang JY (2001) Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:181–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Isbister WH, Prasad J (1997) Emergency large bowel surgery: a 15 years audit. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:285–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Illert B, Engemann R, Thiede A (2001) Success in treatment of complicated diverticular disease is stage related. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:276–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tornqvist A, Forsgren A, Faldt K, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B (1991) Bacterial load and inflammatory reaction in the bowel wall after colonic obstruction. An experimental study in rats. Eur J Surg 157:539–542PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kriwanek S, Armbruster C, Beckerhinn P, Dittrich K (1994) Prognostic factors for survival in colonic perforation. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:158–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grunau G, Heemken R, Hau T (1996) Predictors of outcomes in patients with postoperative intra abdominal infection. Eur J Surg 162:619–625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gooszen AW, Gooszen HG, Veerman W, Van Dongen VM, Hermans S, Klein Kranenbarg E, Tollenaar AEM (2001) Operative treatment of acute complications of diverticular disease: primary or secondary anastomosis after sigmoid resection. Eur J Surg 167:35–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Regenet
    • 1
  • P. Pessaux
    • 1
  • S. Hennekinne
    • 1
  • E. Lermite
    • 1
  • J. J. Tuech
    • 1
  • O. Brehant
    • 1
  • J. P. Arnaud
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Visceral SurgeryC.H.U. AngersAngers Cedex 01France

Personalised recommendations