Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 28, Issue 11, pp 1109–1113 | Cite as

Laparoscopic versus open Kasai portoenterostomy in infant with biliary atresia: a retrospective review on the 5-year native liver survival

  • Kin Wai E. ChanEmail author
  • Kim Hung Lee
  • Siu Yan B. Tsui
  • Yuen Shan Wong
  • Kit Yi K. Pang
  • Jennifer Wai Cheung Mou
  • Yuk Him Tam
Original Article



Laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy was reported to be a safe and feasible procedure in infant with biliary atresia. We aimed to investigate the long-term results after laparoscopic portoenterostomy as such data in the literature are lacking.


Sixteen infants underwent laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy from 2002 to 2006. The age and the sex of the patient, the bilirubin level before the operation, the early clearance of jaundice (total bilirubin <20 μmol/L within 6 months of portoenterostomy), the native liver survival at 2 and 5 years after the operation were reviewed. The results were retrospectively compared with 16 consecutive infants who underwent open Kasai portoenterostomy before 2002.


All infants had type III biliary atresia. The early clearance of jaundice rate at 6 months was 50 % (8/16) after laparoscopic operation and was 75 % (12/16) after open operation (p = 0.144). Two years after the operation, the native liver survival was 50 % (8/16) in the laparoscopic group and was 81 % (13/16) in the open group (p = 0.076). Five years after the operation, the native liver survival rate was 50 % (8/16) in the laparoscopic group and was 81 % (13/16) in the open group (p = 0.076). The jaundice-free native liver survival rate at 5 years was 50 % (8/16) in laparoscopic group and was 75 % (12/16) in the open group. In the laparoscopic group, all patients with early clearance of jaundice survived and remained jaundice freed 5 years after the operation.


The 5-year native liver survival rate after laparoscopic portoenterostomy was 50 %. Apparently superior result was observed in the open group (81 %) although the figures did not reach statistical difference because of the small sample size. A larger scale study is required to draw a more meaningful conclusion.


Laparoscopic Kasai Portoenterostomy Biliary atresia Outcome 


Conflict of interest

Drs. Kin Wai E. Chan, Kim Hung Lee, Siu Yan B. Tsui, Yuen Shan Wong, Kit Yi K. Pang, Jennifer Wai Cheung Mou, Yuk Him Tam have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Kasai M, Suzuki S (1959) A new operation for ‘‘non-correctable’’ biliary atresia: hepatic portoenterostomy. Shujjutsu 13:733Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davenport M, Ong E, Sharif K et al (2011) Biliary atresia in england and wales: results of centralization and new benchmark. J Pediatr Surg 46:1689–1694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esteves E, Clemente Neto E, Ottaiano Neto M et al (2002) Laparoscopic kasai portoenterostomy for biliary atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 18:737–740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee H, Hirose S, Bratton B et al (2004) Initial experience with complex laparoscopic biliary surgery in children: biliary atresia and choledochal cyst. J Pediatr Surg 39:804–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martinez-Ferro M, Esteves E, Laje P (2005) Laparoscopic treatment of biliary atresia and choledochal cyst. Semin Pediatr Surg 14:206–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aspelund G, Ling SC, Ng V et al (2007) A role for laparoscopic approach in the treatment of biliary atresia and choledochal cysts. J Pediatr Surg 42:869–872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dutta S, Woo R, Albanese CT (2007) Minimal access portoenterostomy: advantages and disadvantages of standard laparoscopic and robotic techniques. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:258–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liem NT, Son TN, Quynh TA et al (2010) Early outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 45:1665–1667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan KW, Lee KH, Mou JW et al (2011) The outcome of laparoscopic portoenterostomy for biliary atresia in children. Pediatr Surg Int 27:671–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ure BM, Kuebler JF, Schukfeh N, Engelmann C et al (2011) Survival with the native liver after laparoscopic versus conventional Kasai portoenterostomy in infants with biliary atresia: a prospective trial. Ann Surg 253:826–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laje P, Clark FH, Friedman JR et al (2010) Increased susceptibility to liver damage from pneumoperitoneum in a murine model of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 45:1791–1796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wong KK, Chung PH, Chan KL et al (2008) Should open kasai portoenterostomy be performed for biliary atresia in the era of laparoscopy? Pediatr Surg Int 24:931–933PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nio M, Ohi R, Miyano T et al (2003) Five- and 10-year survival rates after surgery for biliary atresia: a report from the japanese biliary atresia registry. J Pediatr Surg 38:997–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Serinet MO, Wildhaber BE, Broue P et al (2009) Impact of age at Kasai operation on its results in late childhood and adolescence: a rational basis for biliary atresia screening. Pediatrics 123:1280–1286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davenport M, Caponcelli E, Livesey E et al (2008) Surgical outcome in biliary atresia: etiology affects the influence of age at surgery. Ann Surg 24:694–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dillon PW, Owings E, Cilley R et al (2001) Immunosuppression as adjuvant therapy for biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 36:80–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarkhy A, Schreiber RA, Milner RA et al (2011) Does adjuvant steroid therapy post-Kasai portoenterostomy improve outcome of biliary atresia? systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Gastroenterol 25:440–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pakarinen MP, Rintala RJ (2011) Surgery of biliary atresia. Scand J Surg 100:49–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schreiber RA, Barker CC, Roberts EA et al (2010) Biliary atresia in canada: the effect of centre caseload experience on outcome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 51:61–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kin Wai E. Chan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kim Hung Lee
    • 1
  • Siu Yan B. Tsui
    • 1
  • Yuen Shan Wong
    • 1
  • Kit Yi K. Pang
    • 1
  • Jennifer Wai Cheung Mou
    • 1
  • Yuk Him Tam
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Paediatric Surgery and Paediatric Urology, Department of SurgeryThe Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales HospitalHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations