Near-miss events are really missed! Reflections on incident reporting in a department of pediatric surgery
- First Online:
- 345 Downloads
The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of surgical and organizational events that occurred in the whole Department of Paediatric Surgery at Gaslini Children’s Hospital through an incident-reporting system in order to identify the vulnerabilities of this system and improve it.
Materials and methods
This is a 6-month prospective observational study (1st January–1st July 2010) of all events (including surgical and organizational events, and near misses) that occurred in our department of surgery (pediatric surgery, orthopedics and neurosurgery units).
Over a 6-month study period, 3,635 children were admitted: 1,904 out of 3,635 (52.4%) children underwent a surgical procedure. A total number of 111 adverse events and 4 near misses were recorded in 100 patients. A total of 108 (97.3%) adverse events occurred following a surgical procedure. Of 111 adverse events, 34 (30.6%) required re-intervention. Eighteen of 100 patients (18%) required a re-admission, and 18 of 111 adverse events (16.2%) were classified as organizational. Infection represented the most common event.
An electronic physician-reported event tracking system should be incorporated into all surgery departments to report more accurately adverse events and near misses. In this system, all definitions must be standardized and near misses should be considered as important as the other events, being a rich source of learning.
KeywordsNear miss Adverse event Incident reporting Risk management Pediatric surgery
- 5.Morimoto T, Sakuma M, Matsui K et al. (2010) Incidence of adverse drug events and medication errors in Japan: the JADE Study. J Gen Intern Med Sep 25. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 25.National Patient Safety Agency. Cleanyourhands campaign (2010) www.npsa.nhs.uk/cleanyourhands
- 27.Frey B, Schwappach D (2010) Critical incident monitoring in paediatric and adult critical care: from reporting to improved patient outcomes? Curr Opin Crit Care. Oct 7. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 29.Reason JT (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 30.Reason JT (1995) Understanding adverse events: human factors. In: Vincent CA (ed) Clinical risk management. BMJ Publications, London, pp 31–54Google Scholar