Advertisement

Medical predictors of psychological anxieties in VATER patients

  • Meinolf Noeker
  • Muriel Schmitz
  • Eberhard Schmiedeke
  • Nadine Zwink
  • Heiko Reutter
  • Dominik Schmidt
  • Ekkehart Jenetzky
Original Article
  • 211 Downloads

Abstract

Background/purpose

Following a recent classification of the VATER Association provided by the CURE-Net consortium (submitted), we investigate medical predictors of psychological stress and anxieties in this particular condition.

Methods

We developed a new set of questionnaires measuring psychological adjustment and quality of life outcome in conditions associated with anorectal and/or urogenital malformation (one self- report form to be completed by patients 7–17 years of age, two parent report forms with one relating to patients with an age range of 0–6 years, resp. 7–17 years of age). The questionnaire “Malformation-related Stress and Anxieties” comprises 26 items belonging to five subscales (I. Functional and cosmetic impairment, II. Intimacy and relationship, III. Social inclusion, IV. Psychological functioning, V. Family functioning). Every item can be responded to with respect to both actual, present problems already experienced as well as to future anxieties anticipating future development and adjustment (a perspective which especially applies in younger patients). Internal consistencies of the scales are good, resp. very good (Cronbach’s α = .85 concerning present sources of anxiety scale, resp., .94 concerning future anxieties scale). The items are supplied with a Likert-type 5-point scale. We administered the questionnaire in N = 17 children and adolescents suffering from VATER via parental (proxy) report.

Results

As most medical risk factors affected nearly the entire sample, statistical analysis excluded investigation of differential impact on psychological stress experience and anxieties in subjects exposed versus not exposed. Special attention, therefore, was paid to those medical parameters with the best statistical power to differentiate between individuals of high versus low psychological outcome. Medical predictors differentiating between individuals with high versus low adjustment comprise post-operative infections of the urinary tract (t[15] = −3.78, p = .09), wound infections (t[15] = −3.04, p < .01), stoma complications (t[15] = −2.11, p = .08) (e.g., prolapsed (t[13] = −2.37, p = .05), other treatment complications (t[15] = −2.59, p < .05) and presence of a megacolon (t[13] = −2.44, p = .06).

Discussion and conclusions

From the perspective of stress psychology, the findings may indicate that particular medical characteristics of a malformation may operate via two different pathways: (a) pathway of severity of a particular medical risk factor: the presence of a megacolon, for example, may restrict quality of life and successful adjustment via multiple and long term functional impairments associated and (b) pathway of subjective predictability and controllability of treatment course. In accordance with theoretical models from stress psychology, the psychological impact of complicating factors such as wound-healing infections is not operating via severity of impairment, but via implicit messages they convey, indicating a low predictability and controllability of course of disease and treatment. As a result, they may increase intensity of worry and anxieties upon further difficulties still to come during future development. As a conclusion, psychological counseling may not only address concrete functional impairments and stressors, but also basic feelings of insecurity, controllability and self-efficacy.

Keywords

VACTERL VATER Quality of life Stress and coping Adjustment Adaptation Anorectal malformation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are members of the ‘‘Network for Systematic Investigation of the Molecular Causes, Clinical Implications and Psychosocial Outcome of Congenital Uro-Rectal Malformations (CURE-Net)’’ supported by a research grant (01GM08107) from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF): http://www.cure-net.de.

References

  1. 1.
    Quan L, Smith DW (1973) The VATER association. Vertebral defects, anal atresia, t-e fistula with esophageal atresia, radial and renal dysplasia: a spectrum of associated defects. J Pediatr 82:104–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Botto LD, Khoury MJ, Mastroiacovo P, Botto LD, Khoury MJ, Mastroiacovo P, Castilla EE, Moore CA, Skjaerven R, Mutchinick OM, Borman B, Cocchi G, Czeizel AE, Goujard J, Irgens LM, Lancaster PA, Martínez-Frías ML, Merlob P, Ruusinen A, Stoll C, Sumiyoshi Y et al (1997) The spectrum of congenital anomalies of the VATER association: an international study. Am J Med Genet 71:8–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Källén K, Mastroiacovo P, Castilla EE et al (2001) VATER non-random association of congenital malformations: study based on data from four malformation registers. Am J Med Genet 101:26–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khoury MJ, Cordero JF, Greenberg F, James LM, Erickson JD (1983) A population study of the VACTERL association: evidence for its etiologic heterogeneity. Pediatrics 71:815–820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rittler M, Paz JE, Castilla EE (1996) VACTERL association, epidemiologic definition and delineation. Am J Med Genet 63:529–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wheeler PG, Weaver DD (2005) Adults with VATER Association: long-term prognosis. Am J Med Genet 138A:212–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jenetzky E (2007) Prevalence estimation of anorectal malformations using German diagnosis related groups system. Pediatr Surg Int 23:1161–1165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wijers CH, de Blaauw I, Marcelis CL, Wijnen RM, Brunner H, Midrio P, Gamba P, Clementi M, Jenetzky E, Zwink N, Reutter H, Bartels E, Grasshoff-Derr S, Holland-Cunz S, Hosie S, Märzheuser S, Schmiedeke E, Crétolle C, Sarnacki S, Levitt MA, Knoers NV, Roeleveld N, van Rooij IA (2010) Research perspectives in the etiology of congenital anorectal malformations using data of the International Consortium on Anorectal Malformations: evidence for risk factors across different populations. Pediatr Surg Int 26:1093–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rintala R, Mildh L, Lindahl H (1992) Fecal continence and quality of life in adult patients with an operated low anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 27:902–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diseth TH, Emblem R (1996) Somatic function, mental health, and psychosocial adjustment of adolescents with anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 31:638–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bai Y, Yuan Z, Wang W et al (2000) Quality of life for children with fecal incontinence after surgically corrected anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 35:462–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hartman EE, Oort FJ, Aronson DC et al (2004) Critical factors affecting quality of life of adult patients with anorectal malformations or Hirschsprung’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 99:907–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poley MJ, Stolk EA, Tibboel D et al (2004) Short term and long term health related quality of life after congenital anorectal malformations and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Dis Child 89:836–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamid CH, Holland AJ, Martin HC (2007) Long-term outcome of anorectal malformations: the patient perspective. Pediatr Surg Int 23:97–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amae S, Hayashi J, Funakosi S et al (2008) Postoperative psychological status of children with anorectal malformations. Pediatr Surg Int 24:293–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hartman EE, Oort FJ, Sprangers MA et al (2008) Factors affecting quality of life of children and adolescents with anorectal malformations or Hirschsprung disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 47:463–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winter S, Schmidt D, Lenz K, Lehmkuhl U, Jenetzky E, Mau H, Märzheuser S (2009) Prospective evaluation of comorbidity and psychosocial need in children and adolescents with anorectal malformations. Part 2: evaluation of psychosocial need. Pediatr Surg Int 25:895–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hartman EE, Oort FJ, Aronson DC, Sprangers MA (2011) Quality of life and disease-specific functioning of patients with anorectal malformations or Hirschsprung’s disease: a review. Arch Dis Child 96:398–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meinolf Noeker
    • 1
  • Muriel Schmitz
    • 1
  • Eberhard Schmiedeke
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nadine Zwink
    • 4
  • Heiko Reutter
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dominik Schmidt
    • 2
  • Ekkehart Jenetzky
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric PsychologyUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Human GeneticsUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  3. 3.Department of Pediatric Surgery and UrologyChildren’s HospitalBremenGermany
  4. 4.Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging ResearchGerman Cancer Research CenterHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations