Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 27, Issue 11, pp 1239–1244 | Cite as

Analysis of the pediatric surgery match: factors predicting outcome

  • Jason D. Fraser
  • Pablo Aguayo
  • Shawn St. Peter
  • Dan J. Ostlie
  • George W. HolcombIII
  • Walter A. Andrews
  • J. Patrick Murphy
  • Ronald J. Sharp
  • Charles L. Snyder
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Applicants in the NRMP for pediatric surgery have little objective data available regarding factors predicting successful matching. We analyzed data from applicants at our institution to attempt to identify parameters correlated with three outcomes: successfully matching, or attaining either a top ten or top three ranking in our final submitted match list.

Methods

After IRB approval, we reviewed ERAS documents for all applicants (n = 146) over 3 years (candidates for the 2007, 2008, and 2009 fellowship years). An interview was offered to 75% of the applicants (Table 1). We analyzed over 20 factors; including demographics, number of publications and first author publications, number of book chapters, national presentations, prior match attempts, advanced degrees, quality of recommendation letters, and ABSITE scores. Significant variables were evaluated with multiple logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors.

Results

Variables correlated with successful outcome for each of the three endpoints are shown in Table 2. The number of peer-reviewed publications and first author publications, and AOA membership were highly correlated with a favorable outcome for all three endpoints. High ABSITE scores were significantly correlated with top ten rank. Research experience and outstanding letters of recommendation were significantly associated with a top ten ranking and overall match success. Variables associated only with overall match success included number of book chapters, graduation from a US medical school, quality of recommendation letters, and being granted an interview at our institution. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated no independent factors for overall match success; number of publications was significant for both top ten and top three ranking (P = 0.006 for each); number of first author publications (P = 0.002) and AOA membership (P = 0.03) were independent predictors for top three ranking.

Conclusions

Applicant variables associated with success in the match included quality of letters, number and type of publications, research experience, graduation from a US medical school, and AOA membership. Factors not correlated with outcome included advanced degrees (PhD, Masters), other fellowship training, and community-based versus university-based residency training. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated no independent factors for overall match success.

Keywords

Match Residency Ranking Pediatric surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    (2009) Charting outcomes in the match: characteristics of applicants who matched to their preferred speciality in the 2009 Main Residency Match. http://www.nrmp.org/data/chartingoutcomes2009v3.pdf
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Dawkins K, Ekstrom RD, Maltbie A et al (2005) The relationship between psychiatry residency applicant evaluations and subsequent residency performance. Acad Psychiatry 29:69–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuo PC, Schroeder RA, Shah A et al (2008) “Ghost” publications among applicants to a general surgery residency program. J Am Coll Surg 207:485–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Konstantakos EK, Laughlin RT, Markert RJ et al (2007) Follow-up on misrepresentation of research activity by orthopaedic residency applicants: has anything changed? J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2084–2088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Landsford CD, Fisher SR, Ossoff RH et al (2004) Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery residency match: applicant survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:1017–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hammoud DA, Yousem DM, Schaefer PW (2005) Neuroradiology fellowship match: year 4 applicants’ perceptions. J Am Coll Radiol 2:696–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Girzadas DV, Harwood RC, Davis N et al (2004) Gender and the council of emergency medicine residency directors standardized letter of recommendation. Acad Emerg Med 11:988–991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Little DC, Yoder SM, Grikscheit TC et al (2005) Cost considerations and applicant characteristics for the Pediatric Surgery Match. J Pediatr Surg 40:69–73 discussion 73–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason D. Fraser
    • 1
  • Pablo Aguayo
    • 1
  • Shawn St. Peter
    • 1
  • Dan J. Ostlie
    • 1
  • George W. HolcombIII
    • 1
  • Walter A. Andrews
    • 1
  • J. Patrick Murphy
    • 1
  • Ronald J. Sharp
    • 1
  • Charles L. Snyder
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryThe Children’s Mercy HospitalKansasUSA

Personalised recommendations