Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 26, Issue 11, pp 1107–1110 | Cite as

A systematic review and meta-analysis of Hirschsprung’s disease presenting after childhood

  • Reshma Doodnath
  • Prem Puri
Original Article



Hirschsprung’s disease (HD) is characterised by an absence of ganglion cells in the distal bowel, beginning at the internal sphincter and extending proximally to varying distances. It is usually diagnosed in the newborn period, with usual presentation of delayed passage of meconium and abdominal distension, with or without bilious vomiting. HD in adults is rare and is thus often undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to review the presentation, treatment and clinical outcome of HD presenting after childhood.


A systematic review and meta-analysis of all cases of HD presenting after childhood in the English literature was performed from 1950 to 2009. Detailed information regarding demographics, clinical presentation and methods of diagnosis, surgical procedure, complications and the outcome at time of follow up was recorded.


There were 490 cases of HD presenting after childhood in the English literature, 341 (69.5%) males, 129 (26.4%) females and 20 (4.1%) cases where gender was not specified. As much as 390 (79.6%) were confined to the rectum, 60 (12.3%) had recto-sigmoid disease, 4 (0.8%) had disease extending to the descending colon and there were 2 (0.4%) cases that extended to the transverse colon and 2 (0.4%) cases of total colonic disease. The extent of disease was not specified in the remaining 32 (6.5%) cases. A total of 49 (10%) patients had the Swenson procedure, 231 (47.2%) patients had the Duhamel procedure, 40 (8.2%) patients had the Soave procedure, 45 (9.2%) patients had a myectomy only, 3 (0.6%) patients had a myectomy combined with colectomy, 14 (2.9%) patients had a myectomy combined with anterior resection. As much as 26 (5.3%) patients had a lower anterior resection (LAR), 28 (5.7%) patients had LAR combined with colectomy, 10 (2%) patients had a colectomy, 1 (0.2%) patient had an anopexy and 4 (0.9%) patients had a colostomy only. A total of 13 (2.7%) patients refused surgery and managed with conservative treatment, and in 25 (5.1%) patients, the specific procedure was not identified. There were 2 (0.4%) deaths reported; 1 patient died prior to surgery due to colonic perforation and sepsis and the 2nd patient died post-operatively due to appendix stump dehiscence, peritonitis and sepsis. The time of follow up ranged from 1 to 25 years and all, but 6 (1.3%) had a very good clinical outcome.


Hirschsprung’s disease should be considered in patients who have had chronic constipation since birth. This review suggests that the vast majority of patients in whom HD is diagnosed after childhood have normal bowel function after pull-through surgery.


Adult Hirschsprung’s disease Megacolon Aganglionosis 


  1. 1.
    Chen F et al (2006) Hirschsprung’s disease in a young adult: report of a case and review of the literature. Ann Diagn Pathol 10(6):347–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosin JD, Bargen JA, Waugh JM (1950) Congenital megacolon of a man 54 years of age: report of case. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 25(26):710–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grove K, Ahlawat SK (2009) Hirschsprung disease in adults. South Med J 102(2):127–128Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miyamoto M et al (2005) Hirschsprung’s disease in adults: report of a case and review of the literature. J Nippon Med Sch 72(2):113–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnes PR et al (1986) Hirschsprung’s disease and idiopathic megacolon in adults and adolescents. Gut 27(5):534–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vorobyov GI, Achkasov SI, Biryukov OM (2009) Clinical features diagnostics and treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease in adults. Colorectal Dis. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02031.x
  7. 7.
    Hiatt RB (1951) The surgical treatment of congenital megacolon. Ann Surg 133(3):321–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kempton JJ (1954) Hirschsprung’s disease in a man aged 23. Proc R Soc Med 47(7):545–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rich AJ, Lennard TW, Wilsdon JB (1983) Hirschsprung’s disease as a cause of chronic constipation in the elderly. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 287(6407):1777–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim HJ et al (2008) Hirschsprung disease and hypoganglionosis in adults: radiologic findings and differentiation. Radiology 247(2):428–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meier-Ruge W and Bruder E (2008) Histopathological diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Hirschsprung’s disease. In: Holschneider A, Puri P (eds) Hirschsprung’s disease and allied disorders. Springer, pp 185–186Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langer JC et al (1999) Transanal one-stage soave procedure for infants with Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 34(1):148–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duhamel B (1956) New operation for congenital megacolon: retrorectal and transanal lowering of the colon, and its possible application to the treatment of various other malformations. Presse Med 64(95):2249–2250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duhamel B (1964) Retrorectal and transanal pull-through procedure for the treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 7:455–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steichen FM, Talbert JL, Ravitch MM (1968) Primary side-to-side colorectal anastomosis in the Duhamel operation for Hirschsprung’s disease. Surgery 64(2):475–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elliot MS, Todd IP (1985) Adult Hirschsprung’s disease: results of the Duhamel procedure. Br J Surg 72(11):884–885CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Puri P (2008) Swenson’s Procedure. In: Holschneider A, Puri P (eds) Hirschsprung’s disease and allied disorders. Springer, pp 329–330Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soave F (1964) A new surgical technique for treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease. Surgery 56:1007–1014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boley SJ (1968) An endorectal pull-through operation with primary anastomosis for Hirchsprung’s disease. Surg Gynecol Obstet 127(2):353–357PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Children’s Research CentreOur Lady’s Children’s HospitalDublin 12Ireland
  2. 2.School of Medicine and Medical Science and Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical ResearchUniversity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations