Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 759–762 | Cite as

Laparoscopic hernioplasties in children: the implication on contralateral groin exploration for unilateral inguinal hernias

Original Article

Abstract

Background

Inguinal hernias are commonly seen in the paediatric population. Controversies still exist regarding the need for contralateral groin exploration when an unilateral inguinal hernia is presented, since the true incidence of contralateral patent processus vaginalis is not known. With the advent of laparoscopic hernioplasty, the status of the contralateral side can be evaluated at the same setting. Here, we describe our experience in this issue after the introduction of laparoscopic hernioplasty in our unit.

Methods

A retrospective review was carried out between October 2002 and January 2008. All patients presented with unilateral inguinal hernias were included. The demographics of the patients and the operative findings at laparoscopy were recorded. Statistics were performed using Student t-test or χ2 test as appropriate and p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

During the study period, 363 children were included in our study, of which there were 292 males and 71 females. 212 patients presented with right-sided hernias and 151 were left-sided. The mean age of patients at presentation was 48.8 months. The incidence of contralateral PPV overall was 39.7%. There was no decrease in incidence of having a contralateral inguinal hernia in relation to age.

Conclusion

Laparoscopy can accurately diagnose contralateral PPV in children who undergo unilateral inguinal hernia repair and thus holds an advantage over open herniotomy. Furthermore, there should not be an age criteria for contralateral exploration for surgeons who perform open herniotomy.

Keywords

Inguinal hernia Laparoscopy Contralateral exploration Metachronous hernia Children 

References

  1. 1.
    Glick PL, Boulanger SC (2006) Inguinal hernias and hydroceles. In: Grosfeld JL, O’ Neil JA, Fonkalsrud EW Jr, Coran AG (eds) Pediatric surgery, vol 2, 6th edn. Mosby/Elsveir, Philadelphia, pp 1172–1192Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rowe MI, Copelson LW, Clatworthy HW (1969) The patent processus vaginalis and the inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Surg 4:102–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A (2006) Six thousand three hundred sixty-one Pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35 year review. J Pediatr Surg 41:980–986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Misra D, Hewitt G, Potts SR, Brown S, Boston VE (1994) Inguinal herniotomy in young infants, with emphasis on premature neonates. J Pediatr Surg 29:1496–1498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rothenberg R, Barnett T (1995) Bilateral herniotomy in infants and children. Surgery 37:947–950Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mollen KP, Kane TD (2007) Inguinal hernia: what we have learned from laparoscopic evaluation of the contralateral side. Curr Opin Pediatr 19(3):344–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ron O, Eaton S, Pierro A (2007) Systematic review of the risk of developing a metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia in children. Br J Surg 94:804–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tepas J, Stafford P (1986) Timing of automatic contralateral groin exploration in male infants with inguinal hernias. Am Surg 52:70–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miltenberg DM, Nuchtern JG, Jaksic T, Koxinetiz C, Brandt ML (1998) Laparoscopic evaluation of the Pediatric inguinal hernia—a meta analysis. J Pediatr Surg 30:874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Maddox MM, Smith DP (2008) A long term prospective analysis of pediatric unilateral inguinal hernias: should laparoscopy or anything else influence the management of the contra-lateral side. J Pediatr Urol 4:141–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhatia AM, Gow KW, Heiss KF, Barr G, Wulkan ML (2004) Is the use of laparoscopy to determine presence of contralateral patent processus vaginalis justified in children greater than 2 years of age? J Pediatr Surg 39:778–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geiger JD (2000) Selective laparoscopic probing for a contra-lateral patent processus vaginalis reduces the need for contra-lateral exploration in inconclusive cases. J Pediatr Surg 35:1151–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan KL, Tam PK (2003) A safe laparoscopic technique for the repair of inguinal hernias in boys. J Am Coll Surg 196(6):987–989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chan KL, Tam PK (2004) Technical refinements in laparoscopic repair of childhood inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc 18(6):957–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hrabovszky Z, Pinter AB (1995) Routine bilateral exploration for inguinal hernia in infancy and childhood. Eur J Pediatr Surg 5:152–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tackett LD, Breuer CK, Luks FI, Caldamone AA, Breuer JG, Deluca FG (1999) Incidence of contralateral inguinal hernia: a prospective analysis. J Pediatr Surg 34:684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schier F, Montupet P, Esposito C (2002) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in children: a three-center experience with 933 repairs. J Pediatr Surg 37(3):395–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moss RL, Hatch EI (1991) Inguinal hernia repair in early infancy. Am J Surg 161:596–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ikeda H, Suzuki N, Takahashi A (2000) Risk of contralateral manifestation in children with unilateral inguinal hernia: should hernia in children be treated contralaterally? J Pediatr Surg 35:1746–1748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Toufique Ehsan
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. T. L. Ng
    • 1
  • P. H. Y. Chung
    • 1
  • K. L. Chan
    • 1
  • K. K. Y. Wong
    • 1
  • P. K. H. Tam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryQueen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric SurgeryHoly Family Red Crescent Medical College HospitalDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations