Advertisement

Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 675–681 | Cite as

Colon replacement of vagina to restore menstrual function in 11 adolescent girls with vaginal or cervicovaginal agenesis

  • Lavanya Kannaiyan
  • Jacob Chacko
  • Alice George
  • Sudipta Sen
Original Article

Abstract

Aim

Cervicovaginal or vaginal agenesis with functioning endometrial tissue is rare. We report the construction of a colon conduit which is anastomosed to posterior uterine wall or upper vaginal pouch to allow menstruation.

Materials and methods

We report seven girls with cervicovaginal agenesis and four with lower vaginal agenesis (aged 12–20 years) who presented with painful cryptomenorrheoa. All the girls wanted to conserve their uterus and menstruate normally. A colon conduit was constructed for the egress of menstrual blood. The colon conduit was anastomosed to the posterior uterine wall in the seven girls with cervicovaginal agenesis and to the distended upper vaginal pouch in the four girls with vaginal agenesis. Utero-colonic neovaginal anastomosis was performed only after excising a circular portion of the posterior myometrium to prevent stenosis.

Results

The colon conduit functioned effectively, providing an egress for regular painless menstruation. One patient had stenosis of the perineal neovaginal orifice for which dilations were done. One girl has married and reports satisfactory intercourse. The mean follow up is 2.2 years.

Conclusions

This group of patients forms a separate subgroup needing a conduit not only for sexual function but also for menstruation. However, if treated by the method described herein, they should be cautioned against pregnancy if they have cervicovaginal agenesis and against vaginal delivery if they have vaginal agenesis.

Keywords

Vaginal agenesis Cervicovaginal agenesis Colovaginoplasty Utero-colonic neovaginal anastomosis 

References

  1. 1.
    ACOG committee on adolescent health care (2006) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 355: Vaginal agenesis: diagnosis, management, and routine care. Obstet Gynecol 108(6):1605–1609Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deffarges JV, Haddad B, Musset R, Paniel BJ (2001) Utero-vaginal anastomosis in women with uterine cervix atresia: long term follow-up and reproductive performanace. A study of 18 cases. Hum Reprod 18(8):1725–1772Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacob JH, Griffin WT (1989) Surgical reconstruction of the congenitally atretic cervix: two cases. Obstet Gynecol Surv 44(7):556–569. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198907000-00011 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendren WH, Atala A (1994) Use of bowel for vaginal reconstruction. J Urol 152:752–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Acién M, Acién P (2008) Details of genital tract malformations. Fertil Steril 90(2):466–467. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.080 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rink RC, Kaefer M (2002) Campbell–Walsh urology, 9th edn. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB (eds) Saunders, Philidelphia, pp 2428–2464Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fore SR, Hammond CB, Parkes RT, Anderson EE (1975) Urological and genital anomlaes in patients with congenital absence of vagina. Obstet Gynecol 46:410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank RT (1938) The formation of artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 35:1053–1055Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borruto F, Chasen ST, Chervenak FA, Fedele L (1999) The Vecchietti procedure for surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis: comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 64(2):153–158. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00244-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McIndoe (1950) Treatment of congenital absence and obliterative conditons of vagina. Br J Plast Surg 2:254Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joseph VT (1997) Pudendal thigh flap vaginoplasty in reconstruction of genital anomalies. J Ped Surg 32:62–65. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90095-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zafar M, Saeed S, Kant B, Murtaza B, Dar MF, Khan NA (2007) Use of amnion in vaginoplasty for vaginal atresia. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 17(2):107–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hensle TW, Reiley EA (1998) Vaginal replacement in children and young adults. J Urol 159:1035–1038. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63831-X PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’ Connor JL, DeMarco RT, Pope JC IV, Adams MC, Brock JW III (2004) Bowel vaginoplasty in children: a retrospective review. J Ped Surg 39(8):1205–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tillem SM, Stock JA, Hanna MK (1998) Vaginal reconstruction in children. J Urol 160:186–190. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63089-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajimwale A, Furness PD, Brant WO, Koyle MA (2004) Vaginal construction using sigmoid colon in children and young adults. BJU Int 94:115–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-4096.2004.04911.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim SK, Park JH, Lee KC, Park JM, Kim JT, Kim MC (2003) Long term results in patients after rectosigmoid vaginaoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(1):143–151. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000066169.78208.D4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khen-Dunlop N, Lortat-Jacob S, Thibaud E, Clément-Ziza M, Lyonnet S, Nihoul-Fekete C (2007) Rokitansky syndrome: clinical experience and results of sigmpid vaginoplasty in 23 young girls. J Urol 177(3):1107–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rock JA, Zacur HA, Diugi AM et al (1982) Pregnancy success following surgical correction of imperforate hymen and complete transverse vaginal septum. Obstet Gynecol 59:448–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Acien P, Acien MI, Quereda F, Santryo T (2008) Cervico vaginal agenesis spontaneous gestation at term after previous reimplantation of the uterine corpus in a neovagina: case report. Hum Reprod 23(3):548–553. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem420 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jacob JH, Griffin WT (1989) Surgical reconstruction of the congenitally atretic cervix: two cases. Obstet Gynecol Surv 44(7):556–569. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198907000-00011 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chakravarty B, Ronar H (2000) Roy Chowdhury NN. Pregnancies after reconstructive surgery for congenital cervico-vaginal atresia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(2):421–423. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.105740 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fliegner JR, Pepperell RJ (1994) Management of vaginal agenesis with a functioning uterus. Is hysterectomy advisable? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 34(4):467–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1994.tb01273.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raudrant D, Chalouhi G, Dubuisson J, Golfier F (2008) Laparoscopic uterovaginal anastomosis in Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome with functioning horn. Fertil Steril 90(6):2416–2418. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.031 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fedale L, Biana S, Frontino G, Berlande N, Montefasco S, Borrato F (2008) Laparoscopically assisted uterovestibular anastomosis in patients with uterine cervix atresia and vaginal aplasia. Fertil Steril 89(1):212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bailez MM (2007) Laparoscopy in uterovaginal anomalies. Semin Pediatr Surg 16(4):278–287. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2007.06.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lavanya Kannaiyan
    • 1
  • Jacob Chacko
    • 1
  • Alice George
    • 1
  • Sudipta Sen
    • 1
  1. 1.Christian Medical College and HospitalVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations