Modified method of primary esophageal anastomosis with improved outcome in cases of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula
- 153 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
Survival rates for infants who have esophageal atresia (EA) with or without fistula (TEF) have improved dramatically in the past 50 years. Despite excellent long-term survival for patients with esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF), many significant complications can occur. Anastomotic leak at the esophagoesophagostomy site is one such problem resulting in considerable morbidity and mortality in these patients. The methods of esophageal anastomosis for long period has remained the simple end to end anastomosis of esophageal ends with various modifications described from time to time. The present study aims to study the effect on the early postoperative complications, following horizontal mattress suture technique on the primary esophageal anastomosis in cases of EA-TEF. A total of 32 patients with EA-TEF, were operated by our technique during a period of 1 year (2007–2008). The results were compared with the patients (n = 66), who were operated by the traditional simple technique during the same period. Among those patients in whom the esophageal anastomosis was done by horizontal mattress suture, only one had major anastomotic leak, while two had minor anastomotic leaks, as compared to six and nine cases correspondingly in other patients in whom anastomosis was done by simple technique. There was single mortality. We propose that, the utilization of our technique of horizontal mattress suture in primary anastomosis of esophagus in cases of EA-TEF significantly reduces the risk of anastomotic leaks and subsequent morbidity and mortality.
Keywords
Tracheoesophageal fistula Anastomotic leak Horizontal mattress suture Improved outcomeReferences
- 1.Haight C, Towsley H (1943) Congenital atresia of the esophagus with tracheoesophageal fistula: extra pleural ligation of fistula and end to end anastomosis of esophageal segments. Surg Gynecol Obstet 76:672Google Scholar
- 2.Upadhayaya P (1990) Esophageal atresia in India. In: Willital GH, Nihoul Fekette C, Meyers NA (eds) Management of esophageal atresia: diagnosis, therapy, complications and late results. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Munich, pp 28–32Google Scholar
- 3.Bhatnagar V, Agarwala S, Bajpai M, Gupta DK, Mitra DK (1997) Results of treatment of esophageal atresia. Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2:55–59Google Scholar
- 4.Sulamaa MGL, Alvenainen EK (1951) Prognosis and treatment of congenital atresia of the esophagus. Acta Chir Scand 102:141PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Duhamel B (1957) Technique Chirurgicale Infantile. ParisGoogle Scholar
- 6.Touloukian RJ, Seahorse JH (2004) Thirty-five year institutional experience with end to side repair for esophageal atresia. Arch Surg 139:371. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.4.371. Discussion 374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Singh SJ, Shun A (2001) A new technique of anastomosis to avoid stricture in esophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 17:575–577. doi: 10.1007/s003830100579 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cui Y, Urschel JD (1999) Comparison of anastomotic suturing techniques in the rat esophagus. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 40(4):613–614Google Scholar
- 9.Carroll M, Harmon A, Coran G (2005) Congenital anomalies of the esophagus. Pediatric surgery, 6th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1067–1068Google Scholar