Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 53–55

Circumcised hypospadias

  • Rafael V. Pieretti
  • Alberto Pieretti
  • Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with circumcised hypospadias have been of significant concern over many decades due to the belief that prior circumcision might negatively affect the results of hypospadias’ repair. We evaluated outcomes in consecutive males with anterior, distal penile, and the megameatus with intact prepuce variant of hypospadias (MIP).

Methods

After IRB approval a retrospective of 48 consecutive males with circumcised hypospadias was reviewed. In all cases the urethroplasty was accomplished with either urethral plate tubularization or a MAGPI procedure. No skin flaps were used.

Results

A total of 48 patients with circumcised hypospadias (anterior, MIP variant, and distal penile) underwent operative reconstruction by one of us (RVP). All patients were followed for at least 8 months.

Conclusions

Prior circumcision did not negatively affect the results of subsequent urethroplasty in patients with anterior, distal penile, and the MIP variant of hypospadias. The use of the tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) has virtually eliminated the need for skin flaps in anterior hypospadias repair.

Keywords

Hypospadias Circumcision Urethroplasty 

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson HC, King LR, Knox E, Korones SB (2005) Report of the Ad Hoc Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics 56:610–611Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Academy of Pediatrics (1989) Report of the Task Force on Circumcision. Pediatrics 84:388–391Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duckett JW, Keating MA (1989) Technical challenge of the megameatus intact prepuce in hypospadias variant: the pyramid procedure. J Urol 141:1407–1409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hill GA, Wacksman J, Lewis AG et al (1993) The modified pyramid hypospadias procedure: repair of megameatus and deep glanular groove variants. J Urol 150:1208–1211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Snodgrass WT, Khavari R (2006) Prior circumcision does not complicate repair of hypospadias with an intact prepuce. J Urol 2006(176):296–298. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00564-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bang RL, Ebrahim MK, Lari AR (1993) T flap hypospadias repair in circumcised patients. Br J Plast Surg 46(2):164–167. doi:10.1016/0007-1226(93)90153-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baran NK (1982) Urethral advancement for distal hypospadias repair in circumcised patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 70(4):496–504. doi:10.1097/00006534-198210000-00017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael V. Pieretti
    • 1
  • Alberto Pieretti
    • 2
  • Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric Surgery, Section of UrologyMassachusetts General Hospital for ChildrenBostonUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineCentral University of VenezuelaCaracasVenezuela
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryMassachusetts General Hospital for ChildrenBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations