Advertisement

Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 299–301 | Cite as

Laparoscopic appendectomy after conservative management of appendix mass

  • J. Gillick
  • N. Mohanan
  • L. Das
  • P. Puri
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic appendicectomy following non-operative management of appendix mass in children. Medical records of 103 consecutive patients (61 males, 42 females) who underwent non-operative treatment of appendix mass followed by laparoscopic elective appendicectomy were examined. Their ages ranged from 2 years 5 months to 15 years (mean 8.3 years). All patients were treated conservatively by close observation, antibiotics and intravenous fluids. Once the child was fit for discharge laparoscopic elective appendicectomy was booked for 4–6 weeks later. Ninety-three children responded to the initial conservative treatment and were discharged after a mean hospital stay of 5.6 days (range 3–10 days). Ten (9.7%) did not respond to initial treatment and developed appendix abscess requiring drainage. Average hospital stay in the 97 patients who had laparoscopic elective appendicectomy was 2.5 days (range 1–5 days). Three patients developed complications after elective appendicectomy, a stitch abscess in one, paralytic ileus in one and wound infection in one. Histological examination revealed fibrosed or resolving appendicitis in 52, acute or subacute appendicitis in 24, carcinoid tumour in two and normal appendix in 19. Laparoscopic elective appendicectomy is a safe and effective method of treatment following conservative treatment of appendix mass. Not only does it make the dissection and resection of the appendix easier but it also has the added advantage of performing adhesiolysis.

Keywords

Appendix mass Laparoscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Gillick J, Velayudham M, Puri P (2001) Conservative management of appendix mass in children. Br J Surg 88(11):1539–1542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nowzaradan Y et al (1993) Laparoscopic appendectomy: treatment of choice for suspected appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(5):411–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vegunta RK et al (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: technically feasible and safe in all stages of acute appendicitis. Am Surg 70(3):198–201. discussion 201–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blakely ML, Spurbeck WW, Lobe TE (1998) Current status of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 7(4):225–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Semm K (1988) [Pelviscopic appendectomy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 113(1):3–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Najmaldin A (2005) Operative endoscopy and endoscopic surgery in infants and children. Hodder Arnold, London, p 432Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cueto J et al (2006) Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 20(5):717–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin HF et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 10(6):906–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moberg AC et al (2005) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg 92(3):298–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li P et al (2005) Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 40(8):1279–1283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nadler EP et al (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(2):159–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foulds KA, Beasley SW, Maoate K (2000) Factors that influence length of stay after appendicectomy in children. Aust N Z J Surg 70(1):43–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lintula H et al (2004) The costs and effects of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158(1):34–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Valla JS et al (1991) Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):166–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oka T et al (2004) Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 18(2):242–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aziz O et al (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 243(1):17–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Owen A et al (2006) Interval laparoscopic appendectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16(3):308–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goh BK et al (2005) Is early laparoscopic appendectomy feasible in children with acute appendicitis presenting with an appendiceal mass? A prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 40(7):1134–1137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Children’s Research Centre, Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick ChildrenDublin 12Ireland
  2. 2.The National Childrens HospitalDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations