Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 1175–1177 | Cite as

Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) for fecal incontinence in imperforate anus improves quality of life

  • Kelly D. Mattix
  • Nathan M. Novotny
  • Anita A. Shelley
  • Frederick J. Rescorla
Original Article

Abstract

The MACE procedure has been used in patients with imperforate anus (IA) to improve fecal continence. Our aim was to assess the impact of the MACE on the quality of life (QOL) in children with IA and fecal incontinence. A retrospective review was performed of children with IA that underwent the MACE procedure between 1997 and 2004. Patients and their parents were contacted by telephone survey regarding continence and its psychosocial effects before and after MACE. The same survey was given to the patients’ teachers. Responses to 15 questions were compiled and a QOL score calculated and significance evaluated by t-test (P ≤ 0.05). IRB approval was obtained. Thirty-two patients were identified with a mean age at operation of 9 years (4–19 years) and mean follow-up of 3.8 years (7 months to 8 years). Four patients had a low malformation, 8 were intermediate, 15 were high, and 5 had a cloacal anomaly. Twenty patients had documented sacral/spinal anomalies, including five with tethered cord. Post-MACE complications included stenosis in 16 (50%), with 11 requiring an operative revision at a mean of 21.7 months (2 months to 6 years), takedown in one at 4 years and volvulus in one at 18 months. Prior to the MACE, 18/25 (72%) had poor QOL scores. Post-MACE QOL results were similar between patients, parents and teachers. Patients’ mean QOL score improved from 59.9 to 26.3% (P < 0.001), with parents from 59.7 to 26.4% (P < 0.001). QOL score improved >50% in nine families, 25–50% in ten and <25% in six. All patients and parents interviewed reported an improvement in their QOL following the MACE. This procedure should be offered to children with IA with the expectation of significant improvement in QOL.

Keywords

Malone antegrade continence enema MACE Antegrade continence enema Ace Quality of life 

References

  1. 1.
    Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM (1990) Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 336:1217–1218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerharz EW et al (1997) The value of the MACE (Malone antegrade colonic enema) procedure in adult patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:544–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lefèvre J et al (2006) Outcome of antegrade continence enema procedures for faecal incontinence in adults. Br J Surg 93:1265–1269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curry JI, Osborne A, Malone PSJ (1998) How to achieve a successful Malone antegrade continence enema. J Pediatr Surg 33:138–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hill J, Stott S, MacLennan I (1994) Antegrade enemas for the treatment of severe idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 81:1490–1491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dick AC et al (1996) Antegrade colonic enemas. Br J Surg 83:642–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellsworth PI et al (1996) The Malone antegrade colonic enema enhances the quality of life in children undergoing urological incontinence procedures. J Urol 155:1416–1418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rintala RJ, Lindahl HG (2001) Fecal continence in patients having undergone posterior sagittal anorectoplasty procedure for a high anorectal malformation improves at adolescence, as constipation disappears. J Pediatr Surg 36:1218–1221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pena A, Hong A (2000) Advances in the management of anorectal malformations. Am J Surg 180:370–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ditesheim JA, Templeton JM (1987) Short-term v. long-term quality of life following repair of high imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 22:581–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rintala R, Mildh L, Lindahl H (1994) Fecal continence and quality of life for adult patients with an operated high or intermediate anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 29:777–780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rintala R, Lindahl H (1995) Is normal bowel function possible after repair of intermediate and high anorectal malformations? J Pediatr Surg 30:491–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toogood GJ, Bryant PA, Dudley NE (1995) Control of faecal incontinence using the Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: a critical appraisal. Pediatr Surg Int 10:37–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilcox DT, Keily EM (1998) The Malone antegrade colonic enema procedure: early experience. J Pediatr Surg 33:204–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Griffiths DM, Malone PS (1995) The Malone antegrade continence enema. J Pediatr Surg 30:68–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Graf JL et al (1998) The antegrade continence enema procedure: a review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 33:1294–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kokoska ER et al (2001) Outcome of the antegrade colonic enema procedure in children with chronic constipation. Am J Surg 182:625–629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kokoska ER et al (2004) Cecal volvulus: a report of two cases occurring after the antegrade colonic enema procedure. J Pediatr Surg 39:916–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Curry JI, Osborne A, Malone PSJ (1999) The MACE procedure: experience in the United Kingdom. J Pediatr Surg 34:338–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly D. Mattix
    • 2
  • Nathan M. Novotny
    • 2
  • Anita A. Shelley
    • 1
  • Frederick J. Rescorla
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Pediatric SurgeryIndiana University School of Medicine and Riley Hospital for ChildrenIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryIndiana University School of Medicine and Riley Hospital for ChildrenIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations