Pediatric Surgery International

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 1085–1089

Laparoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of gastrostomy in children

Original Article


We present a paediatric institutional experience with laparoscopic gastrostomies (LG) and evaluate its appropriateness as the recommended method for gastrostomy placement. We also sought to evaluate the efficacy of a simple technique for LG and collected information on long-term follow-up after LG. LG was performed in 112 children over a 6-year-period. The procedure involves visualization of the stomach through an umbilical port and a second epigastric gastrostomy site to select and anchor the stomach with sutures prior to the placement of a low profile gastrostomy feeding device (LPGD). The follow-up details of the patients were analysed. A review of literature was done to compare LG with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The median operating time for the procedure in 112 patients was 48 min. There was one open conversion. Median postoperative length of stay was 6 days. Other complications were vomiting (11%), peri- gastrostomy leak (26%), granulation tissue (42%), accidental dislodgement of the LPGD (4%), faulty device requiring replacement (10%), gastric mucosal prolapse (2%) and localized infection (2%). Follow-up ranged from 6 to 75 months with a cumulative gastrostomy usage of 2,352 months. The advantages of the described technique are virtual feasibility in all patients, primary placement of a LPGD, simplicity with requirement of minimal laparoscopic expertise and safety. Comparison with reports of PEG in the literature indicates that LG should be the preferred method of gastrostomy placement in children.


Gastrostomy Laparoscopy Laparoscopic surgery Paediatrics 


  1. 1.
    Tomicic JT, Luks FI, Shalon L, Tracy TF (2002) Laparoscopic gastrostomy in infants and children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:107–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zamakhshary M, Jamal M, Blair GK, Murphy JJ, Webber EM, Skarsgard ED (2005) Laparoscopic vs. percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion: a new paediatric gold standard? J Pediatr Surg 40:859–862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Backman T, Arnbjornsson E, Berglund Y, Larsson LT (2006) Video-assisted gastrostomy in infants less than 1 year. Pediatr Surg Int 22:243–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rothenberg SS, Bealer JF, Chang JH (1999) Primary laparoscopic placement of gastrostomy buttons for feeding tubes. A safer and simpler technique. Surg Endosc 13:995–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Humphrey GM, Najmaldin A (1997) Laparoscopic gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 12:501–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andersson L, Mikaelsson C, Arnbjornsson E, Larsson LT (1997) Laparoscopic aided gastrostomy in children. Ann Chir Gynaecol 86:19–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luck A, Hewett P (1998) Laparoscopic gastrostomy: towards the ideal technique. ANZ J Surg 68:281–283Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Silas D, Pearlman N, Sun J, Norton L (1990) Endoscopic versus operative gastrostomy: final results of a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 36:1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sheehan JJ, Hill AD, Fanning NP, Healy C, McDermott EW, O’Donoghue DP, O’Higgins NJ (2003) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: 5 years of clinical experience on 238 patients. Ir Med J 96:265–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Merwe WG, Brown RA, Ireland JD, Goddard E (2003) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children—a 5 year experience. S Afr Med J 93:781–785PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seguel Ramirez F, Ollero Fresno JC, Morato Robert P, Rollan VillamarinV, Alvarez Bernaldo de Quiros M (2003) Experience in performance of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in 60 children. Cir Pediatr 16:125–127 (in Spanish)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sasaki T, Fukumori D, Sakai K, Sato M, Ohmori H, Yamamoto F (2004) The safety and feasibility of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1062–1065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bankhead RR, Fisher CA, Rolandelli RH (2005) Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes: comparison of surgical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic methods. Nutr Clin Pract 20:607–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saitua F, Acuna R, Herrera P (2003) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: the technique of choice? J Pediatr Surg 38:1512–1515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mikaelsson C, Arnbjornsson E (1998) Single-puncture laparoscopic gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 14:43–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adham M, Baulieux J (2000) Laparoscopic gastrostomy. Surg Endosc 14:500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kawahara H, Kubota A, Okuyama H, Shimizu Y, Watanabe T, Tani G, Hiroaki Y, Okada A (2006) One-trocar laparoscopy-aided gastrostomy in handicapped children. J Pediatr Surg 41:2076–2080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aprahamian CJ, Morgan TL, Harmon CM, Georgeson KE, Barnhart DC (2006) U-stitch laparoscopic gastrostomy technique has a low rate of complications and allows primary button placement: experience with 461 paediatric procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:643–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hull MA, Rawlings J, Murray FE, Field J, McIntyre AS, Mahida YR, Hawkey CJ, Allison SP (1993) Audit of outcome of long-term enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Lancet 341:869–872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peitgen K, von Ostau C, Walz MK (2001) Laparoscopic gastrostomy: results of 121 patients over 7 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc 11:76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Paediatric SurgeryThe Children’s Hospital at WestmeadSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations